Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 71, Issue 3, pp 321–334 | Cite as

The Multinational Corporation and Global Governance: Modelling Global Public Policy Networks

  • David Antony Detomasi


Globalization has increased the economic power of the multinational corporation (MNC), engendering calls for greater corporate social responsibility (CSR) from these companies. However, the current mechanisms of global governance are inadequate to codify and enforce recognized CSR standards. One method by which companies can impact positively on global governance is through the mechanism of Global Public Policy Networks (GPPN). These networks build on the individual strength of MNCs, domestic governments, and non-governmental organizations to create expected standards of behaviour in such areas as labour rights, environmental standards, and working conditions. This article models GPPN in the issue area of CSR. The potential benefits of GPPN include better overall coordination among industry and government in establishing what social expectations the modern MNC will be expected to fill.


corporate social responsibility global public policy network (GPPN) governance non-governmental organizations activism 



Global Public Policy Networks


Foreign Direct Investment


International Monetary Fund


Non-governmental organization


World Trade Organization


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arend A. C. (1999) Legal Rules and International Society. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Braithwaite J., Drahos P. (2000) Global Business Regulation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Brewer T. (eds) (1985) Political Risks in International Business: New Directions for Research, Management, and Public Policy. Praeger Publishers, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  4. Cutler C., Haufler V., Porter T. (eds) (1999) Private Authority and International Affairs. SUNY Press, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  5. Dahl R. (1961) Who Governs? Democracy and Power In An American City Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  6. Dam K. W. (2001) The Rules of the Global Game. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilpin R. E. (1975) U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Kobrin S. J. (1997) The Architecture of Globalization: State Sovereignty in a Networked Global Economy. In: Dunning J. H. (eds) Governments, Globalization, and International Business. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Milner H. V., Yoffie D. B. (1989) Between Free Trade and Protectionism: Strategic Trade Policy and a Theory of Corporate Demands. International Organization 43(2): 239–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nelson J. (2002) Building Partnerships: Cooperation Between the United Nations and the Private Sector. United Nations Publications, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  11. Prahalad C. K. (2005) The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  12. Prahalad C. K., Doz Y. L. (1987) The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision. The Free Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  13. Reinicke W. (1998) Global Public Policy: Governing Without Government? Brookings Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. Rosenau J. S. (1997) Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Sinclair T. J. (2005) The New Masters of Capital: American Bond Rating Agencies and the Politics of Creditworthiness. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  16. Slaughter A. M. (2004) A New World Order. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NYGoogle Scholar
  17. Spar D. (1994) The Cooperative Edge: The Internal Politics of International Cartels. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  18. Stapenhurst F. (1992) Political Risk Analysis Around the North Atlantic. St. Martin’s Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  19. United Nations (UN): 2003, ‚Draft Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights’, document number E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12Google Scholar
  20. United Nations (UN): 2004, World Investment Report (United Nations Publishers, New York)Google Scholar
  21. Wartick S. L., Cochrane P. L. (1985) The evolution of the corporate social performance model. The Academy of Management Review 10(4): 758–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wood D. J. (1991) Corporate social performance revisited. The Academy of Management Review 16(4): 691–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business, Queen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations