Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 70, Issue 4, pp 401–409 | Cite as

On the relationship of hope and gratitude to corporate social responsibility

  • Lynne M. AnderssonEmail author
  • Robert A. Giacalone
  • Carole L. Jurkiewicz
Article

Abstract

A longitudinal study of 308 white-collar U.S. employees revealed that feelings of hope and gratitude increase concern for corporate social responsibility (CSR). In particular, employees with stronger hope and gratitude were found to have a greater sense of responsibility toward employee and societal issues; interestingly, employee hope and gratitude did not affect sense of responsibility toward economic and safety/quality issues. These findings offer an extension of research by Giacalone, Paul, and Jurkiewicz (2005, Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 295-305).

Keywords

corporate social responsibility hope gratitude 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boal K. B., Peery N. (1985). The Cognitive Structure of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Management 2:75–87Google Scholar
  2. Cameron K. S., Dutton J. E., Quinn R. E. (2003). Positive Organizational Scholarship. Berrett-Koehler, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang E. C. (1998). Hope, Problem-solving Ability, and Coping in a College Student Population: Some Implications for Theory and Practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology 54(7):953–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics. (1999). Principles of Stakeholder Management. Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook, T. D. and D. T. Campbell: 1979, Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (Rand McNally, Chicago)Google Scholar
  6. Emmons R. A. (2003). Acts of Gratitude in Organizations. In: Cameron K. S., Dutton J. E., Quinn R. E. (eds). Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline. Berrett-Koelher, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  7. Emmons R. A., McCullough M. E. (2003). Counting Blessings Versus Burdens: An Experimental Investigation of Gratitude and Subjective Well-being in Daily Life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84:377–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Endler N. S. (1973). The Person versus the Situation – A Pseudo Issue? A Response to Alker. Journal of Personality 41:287–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freeman R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Freeman R. E. (1994). The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly 4:409–421Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, M.: 1983, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase it Profits’, in T. Donaldson and P. Werhane (eds.), Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 2nd edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) (Reprinted from New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970]Google Scholar
  12. Giacalone R. A., Paul K., Jurkiewicz C. L. (2005). A Preliminary Investigation into the Role of Positive Psychology in Consumer Sensitivity to Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 58:295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hemingway C. A., Maclagan P. W. (2004). Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 50:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Inglehart R. (1997). Polarized Priorities of Flexible Alternatives: A Comment. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 6:289–292Google Scholar
  15. Kurtz, L.: 1997, ‘No Effect, or No Net Effect? Studies on Socially Responsible Investing’, The Journal of Investing, 37, 37Google Scholar
  16. Lopez, S. J. and C. R. Snyder, (Eds.): 2003, Positive Psychological Assessment: A Handbook of Models and Measures (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC)Google Scholar
  17. Marcoux A. M. (2003). A Fiduciary Argument against Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 13:1–24Google Scholar
  18. McAdams D. P., Hart H., Maruna S. (1998). The anatomy of generativity. In: McAdams D. P., Aubin E. de St. (eds). Generativity and Adult Development: How and Why We Care for the Next Generation. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. McCullough M. E., Emmons R. A., Tsang J. (2002). The Grateful Disposition: A Conceptual and Empirical Topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82:112–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCullough M. E., Kirkpatrick S., Emmons R. A., Larson D. (2001). Is Gratitude a Moral Affect?. Psychological Bulletin 127:249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. (1986). Self Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management 12:531–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schwartz R. H., Post F. R. (2002). The Unexplored Potential of Hope to Level the Playing Field: A Multilevel Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 37:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seligman, M. E. P.: 1999a, Mission Statement and Conclusions of Akumal 1, Retrieved January 9, 1999, from http://www.psych.upenn.edu/seligman/pospsy.htm
  24. Seligman, M. E. P.: 1999b, Positive Psychology: Network Concept Paper. Retrieved September 14, 1999, from http://www.psych.upenn.edu/seligman/pospsy.htm
  25. Seligman M. E. P., Csikszentmihalyi M. (2000). Positive Psychology: An Introduction. American Psychologist 55:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Singhapakdi A., Vitell S. J., Rallapalli K. C., Kraft K. L. (1996). The Perceived Pole of Ethics and Social Responsibility: A Scale Development. Journal of Business Ethics 15:1131–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Snyder C. R. (2000) A New Model of Hope. In: Snyder CR (eds). Handbook of Hope: Theory, Measurement, and Iterventions. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Snyder C. R., Harris C., Anderson J. R., Holleran S. A., Irving L. M., Sigmon S. T., Yoshinobu L., Gibb J., Langelle C. (1991) The Will and the Ways: Development and Validation of an Individual Differences Measure of Hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60:570–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Snyder C. R., Irving L. M., Anderson J. R. (1991) Hope and Health: Measuring the Will and the Ways. In: Snyder CR, Forsyth DR (eds). The Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology: The Health Perspective. Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY, pp. 285–307Google Scholar
  30. Snyder C. R., Lopez S. J. (eds) (2002) Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Snyder, C. R. and S. J. Lopez, (Eds.): 2004, Handbook of Positive Psychology (Oxford University Press, New York)Google Scholar
  32. Snyder C. R., Sympson S. C., Ybasco F. C., Borders T. F., Babyak M. A., Higgins R. L. (1996) Development and Validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2:321–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynne M. Andersson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert A. Giacalone
    • 1
  • Carole L. Jurkiewicz
    • 2
  1. 1.Human Resource Management Department, Fox School of Business and ManagementTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Public Administration Institute, E. J. Ourso College of Business AdministrationLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations