Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 70, Issue 1, pp 5–14 | Cite as

Through the Ethics Looking Glass: Another View of the World of Auditors and Ethics

  • Roger D. MartinEmail author
Article

Abstract

Most people are familiar with the traditional view of the role of ethics in the auditing profession – the need for auditors with integrity and objectivity. This essay addresses a second dimension of ethics in the auditing profession – the demand for auditors to assess the integrity and ethical values of clients. This second dimension is a difficult task for auditors in practice and demands a deep and robust understanding of ethics, ethical infrastructures, and the products of those infrastructures. The essay proposes how educators and researchers might facilitate that understanding.

Keywords

auditing ethical infrastructure ethics integrity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank Craig Lefanowicz, Ben Shenoy, Ann Tenbrunsel and participants at the 2005 Institute for Ethical Business Worldwide conference at the University of Notre Dame for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper, and students in GCOM 738 during summer, 2005 at the University of Virginia for their insights and enthusiasm about these topics.

References

  1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA): 2002, Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit, Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99. (AICPA, New York, NY)Google Scholar
  2. Arens A. A., Elder R. J., Beasley M. S. (2005). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach, 10th edition. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashbaugh H., LaFond R., Mayhew B. W. (2003). Do Nonaudit Services Compromise Auditor Independence? Further Evidence. The Accounting Review 78(3):611–639Google Scholar
  4. Carcello J. V., Nagy A. L. (2004). Audit Firm Tenure and Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 23(2):55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carr A. A. (1968). Is Business Bluffing Ethical? Harvard Business Review 46 (1/2):2–8Google Scholar
  6. Chung H., Kallapur S. (2003). Client Importance, Nonaudit Services, and Abnormal Accruals. The Accounting Review 78(4):931–955Google Scholar
  7. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO): 1992, Internal Control – Integrated Framework (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission)Google Scholar
  8. Frankel R. M., Johnson M. F., Nelson K. K. (2002). The Relation between Auditors’ Fees for Nonaudit Services and Earnings Management. The Accounting Review 77(Supplement):71–105Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert D. T., Malone P. S. (1995). The Correspondence Bias. Psychological Bulletin 117(1):21–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones T. M. (1991). Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review 16(2):366–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Libby R., Kinney W. R. (2000). Earnings Management, Audit Differences, and Analyst Forecasts. The Accounting Review 75(4):383–404Google Scholar
  12. Martinko M. J. (1995). Attribution Theory: An Organizational Perspective. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FLGoogle Scholar
  13. Mayhew B. W., Pike J. E. (2004). Does Investor Selection of Auditors Enhance Auditor Independence?. The Accounting Review 79(3):797–822Google Scholar
  14. Messier W. F. Jr., Glover S. M., Prawitt D. F. (2006). Auditing & Assurance Services: A Systematic Approach, 4th edition. McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  15. Milici-Gaynor, L.: 2000, “The Effects of Current and Prospective Regulation on Investor Perception of Auditor Independence: A Theoretical Framework and Analysis”, unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  16. Misiewicz, K. M.: 2005, “The Normative Impact of CPA Professional Organizations and State Boards on Ethics Education”, working paper, University of Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  17. Myers J. N., Myers L. A., Omer T. C. (2003). Exploring the Term of the Auditor–Client Relationship and the Quality of Earnings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation?. The Accounting Review 78(3):779–799Google Scholar
  18. Rest J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Praeger, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  19. Reynolds J., Francis J. (2001). Does Size Matter? The Influence of Large Clients on Office-Level Auditor Reporting Decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30(3):375–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ricchiute D. N. (2006). Auditing, 8th edition. Thomson South-Western, Mason, OHGoogle Scholar
  21. Rittenberg L. E., Schwieger B. J. (2005). Auditing: Concepts for a Changing Environment, 5th edition. Thomson South-Western, Mason, OHGoogle Scholar
  22. Schneider B. (1990). The Climate for Service: An Application of the Climate Construct. In Schneider B. (eds), Organizational Climate and Culture. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 383–412Google Scholar
  23. Simons D. J., Chabris C. F. (1999). Gorillas In Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events. Perception 28 (9):1059–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tenbrunsel, A. E., S. Chan-Serafin, K. Smith-Crowe, A.P. Brief, E.E. Umphress and J. Joseph: 2005, “What You Can’t See Can Hurt You: An Examination of the Ethical Infrastructure of Organizations”, working paper, University of Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  25. Tenbrunsel A. E., Messick D. M. (2004). Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behavior. Social Justice Research 17(2):223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tenbrunsel A. E., Smith-Crowe K., Umphress E. E. (2003). Building Houses on Rocks: The Role of the Ethical Infrastructure in Organizations. Social Justice Research 16(3):285–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Treviño L. K., Nelson K. A. (2004). Managing Business Ethics. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  28. Weiner B. (1986). An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. Springer-Verlag, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  29. Weiss J. W. (2006). Business Ethics: A Stakeholder and Issues Management Approach, 4th edition. Thomson South-Western, Mason, OHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.McIntire School of CommerceUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations