Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 67, Issue 2, pp 191–200

Toward a Unified Theory of the CSP–CFP Link

Philosophical Foundations

Abstract

This article proposes a unified theory of the relationship between corporate social performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP). The theory provides a framework for rationalizing the various and contradictory findings in past empirical research. The theory is based on the parallels between the business and CSR domains, and thus draws on models from economics.

Keywords

corporate financial performance corporate social performance profit maximization social products stakeholder management stakeholders utility unified theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agle B. R., Mitchell R. K. and Sonnenfeld J. A. (1999). Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values. Academy of Management Journal 42:507–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berman S. L., Wicks A. C., Kotha S. and Jones T. M. (1999). Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal 42:488–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowman E. H. and Haire M. (1975). A Strategic Posture toward Corporate Social Responsibility. California Management Review 18(2):49–58Google Scholar
  4. Donaldson T. and Preston L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review 20:65–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eisenhardt K. M.(1988). Agency – and Institutional – Theory Explanations: The Case of Retail Sales Compensation. Academy of Management Journal 31:488–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Freeman R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  7. Frooman J. (1997). Socially Irresponsible and Illegal Behavior and Shareholder Wealth: A Meta-analysis of Event Studies. Business and Society 36:221–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graffland J. J. (2002). Modelling the Trade-off between Profits and Principles. De Economist 150:129–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Griffin J. J. (2000). Corporate Social Performance: Research Directions for the 21st Century. Business and Society 39:479–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffin J. J. and Mahon J. F. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business and Society 36:5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jensen C. J. (2001). Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2):235–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones T. (1995). Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. Academy of Management Review 20:404–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones T. M. and Wicks A. C. (1999). Convergent Stakeholder Theory. Academy of Management Review 24:206–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Margolis, J. D. and Walsh, J. P.: 2001, Misery Loves Companies: Whither Social Initiatives by Business?, Harvard Business School: Social Enterprise Series No. 19Google Scholar
  15. McGuire J. B., Sundgren A. and Schneeweis T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal 31(4):854–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McWilliams A. and Siegel D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review 26:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mellahi K. and Wood G. (2003). The Role and Potential of Stakeholders in ‘Hollow Participation’: Conventional Stakeholder Theory and Institutionalist Alternatives. Business and Society Review 108:183–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitchell R. K., Agle B. R. and Wood D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review 22:853–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Murray K. B. and Montanari J. R.(1986). Strategic Management of the Socially Responsible Firm: Integrating Management and Marketing Theory. Academy of Management Review 11(4):815–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Orlitzky M., Schmidt L. F. and Rynes S. L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24(3):403–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pava M. L. and Krausz J. (1996). The Association between Corporate Social-responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost. Journal of Business Ethics 15:321–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Preble J. F. (2005). Toward a Comprehensive Model of Stakeholder Management. Business and Society Review 110(4):407–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Preston L. E. and O’Bannon D. P. (1997). The Corporate Social–Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis. Business and Society 36:419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roman R. M., Hayibor S. and Agle B. R.(1999). The Relationship Between Social And Financial Performance: Repainting a Portrait. Business and Society 38:109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rowley T. and Berman S. (2000). A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance. Business and Society 39:397–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simpson G. W. and Kohers T. (2002). The Link Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry. Journal of Business Ethics 35:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sturdivant F. D. and Ginter J. L. (1977). Corporate Social Responsiveness: Management Attitudes and Economic Performance. California Management Review 19(3):30–39Google Scholar
  28. Ullmann A. A. (1985). Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms. Academy of Management Review 10:540–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Waddock S. A. and Graves S. B.(1997). The Corporate Social Performance–Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal 18: 303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Williamson O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, Free PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Wood D. J. and Jones R. E. (1995). Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3:229–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BusinessAPU UniversityHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations