Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 67, Issue 2, pp 165–180 | Cite as

Seeing Is (Not) Believing: Managing the Impressions of the Firm’s Commitment to the Natural Environment

Article

Abstract

This paper examines stakeholder responses to impression management tactics used by firms that express environmental commitment. We inductively analyzed data from 98 open-ended questionnaires and identified two impression management tactics that led respondents to believe that a firm was credible in its commitment to the natural environment. Approximately, half of the respondents responded to illustrative impression management tactics that provide images of, and/or broad-brush comments about, the firm’s commitment to the natural environment. The other half responded to demonstrative impression management tactics, which provide specific facts and details about the firm’s operations. The research results provide important insights into the effects of organizational transparency. In this paper, we explore these findings and provide directions for future research.

Keywords

impression management tactics legitimacy natural environment stakeholders transparency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashforth B. E., Gibbs B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science 1(2):177–194Google Scholar
  2. Bansal P., Clelland I. (2004). Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment. Academy of Management Journal 47(1):93–103Google Scholar
  3. Baumeister R., Jones E. (1978). When Self-Presentation is Constrained by the Target’s Knowledge: Consistency and Compensation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36:608–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benoit W. L. (1995). Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: A Theory of Image Restoration Strategies. State University of New York Press, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernardi R., LaCross C. (2005). Corporate Transparency: Code of Ethics Disclosures. The CPA Journal 75(4):34–37Google Scholar
  6. Botan C., Hazelton V. (1989). Public Relations Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavanaugh G., Moberg D., Velasquez M. (1981). The Ethics of Organizational Politics. Academy of Management Review 6:363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coupland C., Brown A. (2004). Constructing Organizational Identities on the Web: A Case Study of Royal Dutch/Shell. Journal of Management Studies 41(8):1325–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis J. (1993). Strategies for Environmental Advertising. The Journal of Consumer Marketing 10(2):19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DiMaggio P. J., Powell W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elsbach K. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly 39(1):57–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elsbach K. D., Sutton R. I. (1992). Acquiring Organizational Legitimacy Through Illegitimate Actions: A Marriage of Institutional and Impression Management Theories. Academy of Management Journal 35(4):699–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenhardt K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review 14(4):532–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Esrock S. L., Leichty G. B. (1998). Social Responsibility and Corporate Web Pages: Self-Presentation or Agenda-setting? Public Relations Review 24(3):305–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fombrun C., Rindova V. P. (2000). The Road to Transparency: Reputation Management at Royal Dutch/Shell. In: Schultz M., Hatch M. J., Larsen M. H. (eds), The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation and the Corporate Brand. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 77–94Google Scholar
  16. Fuller S. R., Edelman L. B., Matusik S. F. (2000). Legal Readings: Employee Interpretation and Mobilization of Law. Academy of Management Review 25(1):200–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gardner W. L., Avolio B. J. (1998). The Charismatic Relationship: A Dramaturgical Perspective. Academy of Management Review 23(1):32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ginzel L. E., Kramer R. M., Sutton R. I. (1993). Organizational Impression Management as a Reciprocal Influence Process: The Neglected Role of the Organizational Audience. Research in Organizational Behavior 15:227–266Google Scholar
  19. Greenberg J. (1990). Looking Fair vs. Being Fair: Managing Impressions of Organizational Justice. Research in Organizational Behavior 12:111–157Google Scholar
  20. Hart S. L. (1995). A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Academy of Management Journal 37(2):986–1014Google Scholar
  21. Hart S. L., Ahuja G. (1996). Does it Pay to be Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Pollution Prevention and Firm Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment 5:30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hooghiemstra R. (2000). Corporate Communication and Impression Management – New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 27:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiang R. J., Bansal P. (2003). Seeing the Need for ISO 14001. The Journal of Management Studies 40(4):1047–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klassen R. D., McLaughlin C. P. (1996). The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance. Management Science 42(8):1199–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kostova T., Roth K. (2003). Social Capital in Multinational Corporations and a Micro–Macro Model of its Formation. Academy of Management Review 28(2):297–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levy D. L. (1997). Environmental Management as Political Sustainability. Organization & Environment 10(2):126–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Livesey S. M., Kearins K. (2002). Transparent and Caring Corporations? A Study of Sustainability Reports by The Body Shop and Royal Dutch/Shell. Organization & Environment 15:233–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. March J. G., Olson J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. Free Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  29. Marcus A. A., Goodman R. S. (1991). Victims and Shareholders: The Dilemmas of Presenting Corporate Policy during A Crisis. Academy of Management Journal 34(2):281–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meyer J. W., Rowan B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83:340–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miles M. B., Huberman A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  32. Milne M. J., Patten D. M. (2002). Securing Organizational Legitimacy: An Experimental Decision Case Examining the Impact of Environmental Disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15:372–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moberg D. (1989). The Ethics of Impression Management. In: Giacalone R., Rosenfeld P. (eds), Impression Management in the Organization. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 377–396Google Scholar
  34. Mohamed A. A., Gardner W. L., Paolillo J. G. (1999). A Taxonomy of Organizational Impression Management Tactics. Advances in Competitiveness Research 7(1):108–130Google Scholar
  35. O’Donovan G. (2002). Environmental Disclosures in the Annual Report: Extending the Applicability and Predictive Power of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15:344–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Reilly C. A., Chatman J., Caldwell D. (1991). People and Organizational Culture: A Q-Sort Approach to Assessing Person-Organizational Fit. Academy of Management Journal 34(3):487–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oliver C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review 16(1):145–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Patten D. M. (2002). Give or Take on the Internet: An Examination of the Disclosure Practices of Insurance Firm Web Innovators. Journal of Business Ethics 36(3):247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paulhus D. (1984). Two-Component Models of Socially Desirable Responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46:598–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  41. Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  42. Rhee S. K., Lee S. Y. (2003). Dynamic Change of Corporate Environmental Strategy: Rhetoric and Reality. Business Strategy and the Environment 12(3):175–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Russo M. V., Fouts P. A. (1997). A Resource-based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40(3):534–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sallot L. (2002). What the Public Thinks About Public Relations: An Impression Management Experiment. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 79(1):150–171Google Scholar
  45. Schlenker B. R. (1980). Impression Management. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CAGoogle Scholar
  46. Schlenker B., Leary M. (1982). Social Anxiety and Self-Presentation: A Conceptualization and Model. Psychological Bulletin 92:641–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scott W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Sage, Thousands Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  48. Snider J., Hill R. P., Martin D. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World’s Most Successful Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 48(2):175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tapscott, D. and D. Ticoll: 2003, The Naked Corporation: How the Age of Transparency Will Revolutionize Business (The Free Press).Google Scholar
  50. Viswanathan M., Childers T. (1996). Processing of Numerical and Verbal Product Information. Journal of Consumer Psychology 5(4):359–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weick K. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  52. Westphal J. D., Gulati R., Shortell S. M. (1997). Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(2):366–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilmhurst T. D., Frost G. R. (2000). Corporate Environmental Reporting. A Test of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 13:10–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yin R. K. (1989). Case Study Research. Sage Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  55. Zajac E. J., Westphal J. D. (1995). Accounting for the Explanations of CEO Compensation: Substance and Symbolism. Administrative Science Quarterly 40:283–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Richard Ivey School of BusinessOntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations