Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 67, Issue 2, pp 125–137 | Cite as

Leadership, Ethics and Responsibility to the Other

Article

Abstract

Of recent time, there has been a proliferation of concerns with ethical leadership within corporate business not least because of the numerous scandals at Enron, Worldcom, Parmalat, and two major Irish banks – Allied Irish Bank (AIB) and National Irish Bank (NIB). These have not only threatened the position of many senior corporate managers but also the financial survival of some of the companies over which they preside. Some authors have attributed these scandals to the pre-eminence of a focus on increasing shareholder value in Western business schools and/or to their failure to inculcate ethical standards. In this paper, we challenge these accounts and the aetiological view of knowledge from which they derive but are grateful for the consensus that they convey regarding the importance of business ethics. The paper focuses on different approaches to ethical leadership concluding with a view that some hybrid of MacIntyre’s virtue ethics and Levinas’s ethics of responsibility may serve as an inspiration for both educators and practitioners.

Keywords

corporate scandals ethical leadership ethics of responsibility. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahamson E (1991) Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations. Academy of Management Review 16(3):586–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrahamson E (1996) Management Fashion. Academy of Management Review 21(1):254–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ABS Media Bulletin: 13 (2004), ‘CSR: UK Business Schools have been Active for Many Years’, Association of Business Schools, 344–354 Gray’s Inn Road, London WC1X 8BP. media@the-abs.org.ukGoogle Scholar
  4. Alferoff, C. and D. Knights: 2005, ‘Making and Mending your Nets: The Management of Uncertainty in Academic/Practitioner Knowledge Networks’, Forum on the Future of the Business School, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, 13th DecGoogle Scholar
  5. Arjoon S (2000) Virtue theory as a Dynamic Theory of Business. Journal of Business Ethics 31:65–76Google Scholar
  6. Bauman Z (1993) Postmodern Ethics. Blackwell. Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Beck, U.: 1992a, The Risk Society. London: SageGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck U. (1992b). From Industrial Society to the Risk Society: Questions of Survival, Social Structure and Ecological Enlightenment. Theory, Culture and Society 9(1):97–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beer M (2001) Why Management Research Findings Are Unimplementable: An Action Science Perspective, REFLECTIONS. Society for Organizational Learning and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2(3):58–63Google Scholar
  10. Brien A. (1998) Professional Ethics and the Culture of Trust. Journal of Business Ethics 17:391–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caulkin, S.: 2005, ‘Business Schools for Scandal: What the Academics Teach is What Created Enrons’, summarizing Goshall’s thesis, e, Observer Business Section, March 28thGoogle Scholar
  12. Chalier, C.: 1993, ‘Emanuel Levinas: Responsibility and Election’, in A. Phillips Griffiths (ed.), Ethics, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement: 35 (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky N (1970) Recent Contributions to a Theory of Innate Ideas. In: Hudson L (eds) The Ecology of Human Intelligence. Penguin, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  14. Clegg SR, Ross-Smith A (2003) Revising the Boundaries: Management Education and Learning in a Postpositivist World. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2(1):85–98Google Scholar
  15. Collins EGC, Devanna MA (eds) (1990) The Portable MBA. John Wiley, New York, Chichester, etcGoogle Scholar
  16. Crane A, Matten D (2004) Business Ethics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Derrida, J.: 1992, The Gift of Death, Trans. By David Wills (Chicago University Press, Chicago)Google Scholar
  18. De Tocqueville, A.: 1998, Democracy in America. Wordsworth Edition: Hertfordhire: Ware, originally published 1835Google Scholar
  19. Durkheim, E.: 1887, ‘La science positive de la morale en Allemagne’, Revue philosophique 24, 33–58; 113–142; and 275–284Google Scholar
  20. Giddens A (1971) Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: an analysis of the writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Goshal S (2005) Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education 4(1):75–81Google Scholar
  22. Grey C (2004) Reinventing Business Schools: The Contribution of Critical Management Education. Academy of Management Learning and Education 3(2):178–186Google Scholar
  23. Grint K (2000) The Arts of Leadership. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Knights D, McCabe D (2003) Organization and Innovation: Guru Schemes and American Dreams. Open University Press/McGraw Hill, Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar
  25. Knights D, Noble F, Vurdubakis T, Willmott H (2002) Allegories of Creative Destruction: Technology and Organisation in Narratives of the e-Economy. In: Woolgar S (eds) Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 99–114Google Scholar
  26. Knights D, O’Leary M (2005) Reflecting on Corporate Scandals: The Failure of Ethical Leadership forthcoming in. Business Ethics: A European Review 14 (4):348–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Latour B (1987) Science In Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Open University Press, Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar
  28. Levinas, E.: 1966, ‘On the Trail of the Other’, Translated by Daniel J. Hoy. Philosophy Today 10(1), 34–46Google Scholar
  29. Levinas, E.: 1969, Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by Alphonso Lingis (Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh)Google Scholar
  30. Levinas E (1981) Otherwise than Being of Beyond Essence. Martinus Niihoff Publishers, The Hague/Boston/LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Levinas, E.: 1991/1998, Entre Nous: On Thinking of The Other (European Perspectives). Translated by Michael B.␣Smith and Barbara Harshav (Columbia Univ Press)Google Scholar
  32. MacIntyre A (1991) After Virtue. Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Maier, M.: 2002, ‘Ten Years after a Major Malfunction...Reflections on the Challenger Syndrome’, Journal of Management Inquiry 11(3), 282–292Google Scholar
  34. Minkes A., Small M.W., Chatterjee S.R. (1999) Leadership and Business Ethics: Does It Matter? Implications for Management. Journal of Business Ethics 20:327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mintzberg H (2004). Managers Not MBAs. Pearson Education, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Mintzberg, H., R. Simons and K. Basu: 2002, Fall, ‘Beyond Selfishness’, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 67–74Google Scholar
  37. Molyneaux D (2003) Blessed are the Meek, for they Shall Inherit the Earth: An Aspiration Applicable to Business? Journal of Business Ethics 48:347–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morrison A (2001) Integrity and Global Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics 31:65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Newell S, Robertson M, Swan J (2001) Special issue on fads and fashions. Organization 8/1:1–144Google Scholar
  40. Pfeffer J, Fong CT (2002) The End of Business Schools? Less Success than Meets the Eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education 1(1):78–95Google Scholar
  41. Pfeffer J, Fong CT (2004) The Business School: Some lessons from the U.S. experience. Journal of Management Studies 41:1501–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Plato: 1993, ‘Republic’ translated with an introduction by Desmond Lee (Penguin, London)Google Scholar
  43. Sims R, Brinkmann J (2002) Leaders as Role Models: The Case of John Gutfreund at Solomon Brothers. Journal of Business Ethics 35:327–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith A (1759/1790) The Theory of Moral Sentiments. A. Millar, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Stephens, L.: 1882, The Science of Ethics (G.P. Putnam's and Son's, New York)Google Scholar
  46. Takala T (1998) Plato on Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics 17:785–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Trevino L, Brown M, Hartman L (2003) A Qualitative Investigation of Percieved Executive Ethical Leadership: Perceptions from Inside and Outside the Executive Suite. Human Relations 6(1):5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trungpa, C.: 2002, Cutting Through Spiritual Materialism (Shambala Publications)Google Scholar
  49. Whetstone J (2001). How Virtue Ethics Fits Within Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 33:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economic and Management StudiesUniversity of KeeleNewcastle-under-LymeU.K.

Personalised recommendations