Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 58, Issue 1–3, pp 125–136 | Cite as

Integrity as a Business Asset

  • Daryl Koehn


In this post-Enron era, we have heard much talk about the need for integrity. Today’s employees perceive it as being in short supply. A recent survey by the Walker Consulting Firm found that less than half of workers polled thought their senior leaders were people of high integrity. To combat the perceived lack of corporate integrity, companies are stressing their probity. This stress is problematic because executives tend to instrumentalize the value of integrity. This paper argues that integrity needs to be better defined because the current mode of talking about the subject is misleading. The paper considers three traditions’ understanding of the idea of integrity, argues that integrity is intrinsically valuable, and concludes with some reflections on the way in which integrity, properly understood, functions as a business asset.


integrity compassion prudence asset 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angier, M. (2003). Ten Reasons to Live a Life of Integrity’ at Scholar
  2. Barker, K.LBurdick, D.W. eds. 2002Zondervan NIV Study BibleZondervan Bible PublishersGrand Rapids, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  3. Beebe, J. 1995Integrity in DepthFromm International PublishingNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogle J. (2003). What Went Wrong in Corporate America?’ Remarks at the Community Forum Distinguished Speaker Series,Bryn Mawr Presbyterian Church, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, February 24, 2003Google Scholar
  5. Boisjoly, R. (2003). Challenger Disaster’, at Scholar
  6. Chen, S.C. (2003). Integrity at Work’, at JobStreet.comGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, S. (2003). Ethical Lapses Can Destroy Businesses from Within’. Bizjournals (January 6) at http://www.bizjournals.comGoogle Scholar
  8. Damato K. (2002). Funds’ Relatively Untarnished Image May Be Tainted’. Wall Street Journal (September 4), A1, A3Google Scholar
  9. Ford Motor Company Standards of Corporate Conduct. (1976). Policy Letter No. 3 Subject: Standards of Corporate Conduct, dated May 1, 1976 and reproduced at Scholar
  10. Hall, D.L, Ames, R.T. 1987Thinking Through ConfuciusState University of New York PressAlbany, NYGoogle Scholar
  11. Huy, Q.N. (2003). An Emotion-based View of Strategic Renewal’, unpublished empirical study presented at Strategic Process Conference, INSEAD, April 25Google Scholar
  12. Long, S. (1999). Australia’s Live-Long Day’. Financial Review (November 10) at Scholar
  13. Miller, D.P. 2003What Was Hidden? Looking Deeper into Christianity; an Interview with Richard SmoleyThe Sun33 (September)10Google Scholar
  14. Nietzsche, F. 1986The Wanderer and His Shadow’Hollindale, R.J. eds. Human, All Too Human, transCambridge University PressNew York394Google Scholar
  15. Tao, J. 2000Two Perspectives of Care: Confucian Ren and Feminist Care’Journal of Chinese Philosophy27218219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Twigg, A. (1981). For Openers: Conversations with 24 Canadian Writers (Harbour, Madeira Park, B.C.). Walker Survey: posted 2003 at www.walkerinfo.comGoogle Scholar
  17. White, T. (1999). Ethics Incorporated: How America’s Corporations Are Institutionalizing Moral Values’ at; www.ethicand and+the+bottom+line22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cullen Chair in Business Ethics & Executive Director of the Center for Business EthicsUniversity of St. ThomasHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations