Tone at the Top: An Ethics Code for Directors?

  • Mark S. Schwartz
  • Thomas W. Dunfee
  • Michael J. Kline

Abstract.

Recent corporate scandals have focused the attention of a broad set of constituencies on reforming corporate governance. Boards of directors play a leading role in corporate governance and any significant reforms must encompass their role. To date, most reform proposals have targeted the legal, rather than the ethical obligations of directors. Legal reforms without proper attention to ethical obligations will likely prove ineffectual. The ethical role of directors is critical. Directors have overall responsibility for the ethics and compliance programs of the corporation. The tone at the top that they set by example and action is central to the overall ethical environment of their firms. This role is reinforced by their legal responsibilities to provide oversight of the financial performance of the firm. Underlying this analysis is the critical assumption that ethical behavior, especially on the part of corporate leaders, leads to the best long-term interests of the corporation. We describe key components of a framework for a code of ethics for corporate boards and individual directors. The proposed code framework is based on six universal core ethical values: (1) honesty; (2) integrity; (3) loyalty; (4) responsibility; (5) fairness; and (6) citizenship. The paper concludes by suggesting critical issues that need to be dealt with in firm-based codes of ethics for directors.

Keywords

Boards of directors ethics law codes corporate governance 

References

  1. Akaah, I. P., Riordan, E. A. 1989‘Judgements of Marketing Professionals About Ethical Issues in Marketing Research: A Replication and Extension’Journal of Marketing Research26112120Google Scholar
  2. Akula, J. L. 2000Spring, ‘Business Crime: What to Do When the Law Pursues You’Sloan Management Review412942Google Scholar
  3. Allmon, D. E., Grant, J. 1990‘Real Estate Sales Agents and the Code of Ethics: A Voice Stress Analysis’Journal of Business Ethics9807812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amgen: 2003, http://www.ext.amgen.com/investor/codeOfconduct.html.Google Scholar
  5. Ang, J. S. 1993‘On Financial Ethics’Financial Management223259Google Scholar
  6. AT&T: 2003, ‘Code of Conduct’, www.att.com/ir.cg/cgg/html.Google Scholar
  7. Barry, M. 2002‘Why Ethics & Compliance Programs Can Fail’The Journal of Business Strategy233740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baue, W.: 2002, ‘SRI Mutual Funds Continue and Enhance Corporate Governance Screening’, Socialfunds.com, http://www.socialfunds.com/news/article.cgi?sfArticleId = 916.Google Scholar
  9. Baum, S.: 2003, ‘A Board’s Top Job: Watching the CEO’, Business Week Online, http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/may2003/nf2003056_5899.htm.Google Scholar
  10. Baumhart, R. C. 1961‘How Ethical Are Businessmen?’Harvard Business Review3969Google Scholar
  11. BellSouth: 2003, ‘Our Personal Responsibility’, http://ethics.bellsouth.com/committment_booklet_21103.pdf.Google Scholar
  12. Berenbeim, R. E. 2002‘The Enron Ethics Breakdown’Executive Action1516Google Scholar
  13. Bivins, T. H. 1993‘Public Relations, Professionalism, and the Public Interest’Journal of Business Ethics12117126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brenner, S. N., Molander, E. W. 1977‘Is the Ethics of Business Changing’Harvard Business Review555771Google Scholar
  15. Business Times: 2002, ‘US $6 Billion Deal Done in Just 90 Minutes’, http://business-times.asia1.com.sg/sub/news/story/0,4574,84058,00.html.Google Scholar
  16. CalPERS: 2003, http://www.calpers.ca.gov/invest/calpers-assets/asset-allocation.htm.Google Scholar
  17. Caremark International Derivative Litigation: 1996, 698A.2d 959 (Del. Ch.).Google Scholar
  18. CNN: 2003, http://www.money.cnn.com/news/specials/corruption.Google Scholar
  19. CNN Watkins: 2002, February 14, http://money.cnn.com/2002/02/14/news/enron_roundup/.Google Scholar
  20. Coffee, J. C. Jr.: 2002, ‘Understanding Enron: ’It’s About the Gatekeepers, Stupid’, Business Lawyer1403–1420.Google Scholar
  21. Cohan, J. A. 2002”I Didn’t Know’ and ’I Was Only Doing My Job’: Has Corporate Governance Careened Out of Control? A Case Study of Enron’s Information Myopia’Journal of Business Ethics40275299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Colgate-Palmolive: 2003, ‘Corporate Governance Commitment’, http://investor.colgatepalmolive.com/corp_gov.cfm.Google Scholar
  23. Colley, J. L.,Jr, Doyle, L. J., Logan, G. W., Stettinius, W. 2003Corporate GovernanceMcGraw-HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Cooper, R. W., Frank, G. L. 1990‘Ethics in the Property-Liability Insurance Industry: Perceptions of the Issues’CPCU Journal43224238Google Scholar
  25. Corporate Library: 2003, ‘Corporate Scandals Quick Sheet’, (http://www.thecorporatelibrary.com/spotlight/scandals/scandal-quicksheet.html).Google Scholar
  26. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., Cannella, A. A. 2003‘Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data’Academy of Management Review28477Google Scholar
  27. Directors‘ Report: 2003, ’Report of Investigation by the Special Investigative Committee of the Board of Directors of WorldCom, Inc.’Google Scholar
  28. Driscoll, D. M. 1995Autumn, ‘The Ethical Responsibility of Directors and Trustees’Montana Business Quarterly3310Google Scholar
  29. Dunfee, T. W. 1999‘Corporate Governance in a Market with Morality’Law & Contemporary Problems62129158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. EDS: 2003, ‘EDS Code of Business Conduct’, http://www.eds.com/investor_relations/eds_conduct_a4.pdf.Google Scholar
  31. Enron: Senate Committee Report: 2002, http://bodurtha.georgetown.edu/enron/.%5CThe%20Role%20of%20the %20Board%20of %20%Directors%20in%20Enron’s%20Collapse_070702_main.htm.Google Scholar
  32. Enron’s Code of Ethics: 2002, http://www.thesmokinggun.com/graphics/packageart/enron/enron.pdf.Google Scholar
  33. EOA: 2001, Survey, Ethikos and Corporate Conduct Quarterly 15(1), http://ecampus.bentley.edu/dept/cbe/newresearch/11.html.Google Scholar
  34. Fairfax, L. M. 2002Fall, ‘The Sarbanes-Oxley Act as Confirmation of Recent Trends in Director and Officer Fiduciary Obligations’St. John’s Law Review76953978Google Scholar
  35. Felo, A. J. 2001‘Ethics Programs, Board Involvement, and Potential Conflicts of Interest in Corporate Governance’Journal of Business Ethics32205218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Forker, L. B. 1990‘Purchasing Professionals in State Government: How Ethical Are They?’Journal of Business Ethics9903911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fort, T. L. 1997‘The Corporation as Mediating Institution: An Efficacious Synthesis of Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Constituency Statutes’Notre Dame Law Review73173203Google Scholar
  38. France, M. and D. Carney: 2002, ‘Why Corporate Crooks Are Tough to Nail’, Business Week Online, (http://www.businessweek.com:/print/magazine/content/02_26/b3789013.htm?mz).Google Scholar
  39. Freeman, R. E., Kimball, R. C., Albertson, T. L., Johnston, J. C., Ryan, L. V., Gentile, M. C. 1992‘A Question of Ethics’CFO: The Magazine for Senior Financial Executives81927Google Scholar
  40. Gray, J.: 2003, ‘Shareholder No. 1’, Canadian Business 40–46.Google Scholar
  41. Gray, J.: 2003, ‘How the Boards Rank’, Canadian Business 59–61.Google Scholar
  42. Greenspan, A.: 2002, ‘The New Corporate Sin’, http://www.happinessonline.org/InfectiousGreed/p2.htm.Google Scholar
  43. Guardian: 2002, ‘Bush’s Speech on Corporate Responsibility’, http://www.guardian.co.uk/Print/0,3858, 4458472,00.html.Google Scholar
  44. Hanewicz, W. O. 2003Winter, ‘When Silence is Golden: Why the Business Judgment Rule Should Apply to No-Shops in Stock-for-Stock Merger Agreements’Journal of Corporation Law28205258Google Scholar
  45. Hilzenrath, D. S.: 2003, ‘How a Distinguished Roster of Board Members Failed to Detect Company’s Problems’, Washington Post Online, http://www.washingtonpost. com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A60199–2003Jun14&notFound=true.Google Scholar
  46. Hymowitz, C.: 2003, ‘Corporate Governance: A Special Report: How to Fix A Broken System: A Rush of New Plans Promise to Make Corporate Boards More Accountable; Will They Work?’, Wall Street Journal, R1.Google Scholar
  47. Institute of Directors: 2003, ‘Code of Professional Conduct’, www.iod.com.Google Scholar
  48. Institute of Directors of Southern Africa, www.iodsa.co. za.Google Scholar
  49. International Chamber of Commerce: 2003, ‘Corporate Governance Self Assessment’, http://www.iccwbo. org/CorpGov/Self_assessment.asp.Google Scholar
  50. Iwan, L. E., Watts, C. M. 2002Fall, ‘Enron and the D&O Aftermath: Tips and Traps for the Unwary’FDCC Quarterly536584Google Scholar
  51. Jennings, M. M. 2003‘A Primer on Enron: Lessons from a Perfect Storm of Financial Reporting, Corporate Governance and Ethical Culture Failures’California Western Law Review39163262Google Scholar
  52. Josephson, M. 1997Ethics in the Workplace: Resource Reading MaterialsJosephson Institute of Ethics, Marina del ReyCAGoogle Scholar
  53. Lay, K.: 1999, ‘What Should a CEO Expect from a Board, Corporate Governance, Ethics Across the Board’, Conference sponsored by the Center for Business Ethics at the University of St. Thomas, http://www.stthom. edu/cbes/conferences/kenneth_lay.html.Google Scholar
  54. Lublin, J. S.: 2003, ‘Corporate Governance: A Special Report: What’s Your Solution? We Asked Some Experts, and Here’s What They Said’, Wall Street Journal, R8.Google Scholar
  55. McGrath, S., A. Siegel, T. W. Dunfee, A. S. Glazer and H.R. Jaenicke: 2001, Autumn, ‘Assessing Your Audit Firm’s Independence: Guidance for Audit Committee Members’, Corporate Board Member, www.boardmember.comGoogle Scholar
  56. Monks, R. A. G., Minow, N. 2001Corporate Governance2Blackwell PublishersOxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  57. Murray, M.: 2003, ‘Corporate Governance: A Special Report: What’s Your Solution? We Asked Some Experts, and Here’s What They Said’, Wall Street Journal R8.Google Scholar
  58. NACD Recommendations: 2002, ’Recommendations From the National Association of Corporate Directors’, http://www.nacdonline.org/nacd/enron_recommendations.asp.Google Scholar
  59. NACS: 2002, ‘The Rise and Fall of Enron: Principles for Director Focus’, DM Extra, p. 4.Google Scholar
  60. Nemes, J. 1992‘HFMA Toughens Policies on Law-Breakers’Modern Healthcare233536Google Scholar
  61. New York Stock Exchange: 2002, Amendment #1 to the NYSE’s Corporate Governance Rule Proposals’, http://www.nyse.com/pdfs/amend1–04-09-03.pdf.Google Scholar
  62. Nixon, M. A. 1987‘Legal Lights: Business Ethics’Project Management Journal182325Google Scholar
  63. Nofsinger, J., Kim, K. 2003Infectious Greed: Restoring Confidence in America’s CompaniesUpper Saddle River NJFT Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  64. O’Boyle, E. J., Dawson, L. E.,Jr 1992‘The American Marketing Association Code of Ethics: Instructions for Marketers’Journal of Business Ethics11921932Google Scholar
  65. O’Connor, M. A.: 1991, ‘Restructuring the Corporation’s Nexus of Contracts: Recognizing a Fiduciary Duty to Protect Displaced Workers’, 69 N.C. L. Rev. 1189.Google Scholar
  66. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance: 1999, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/50/4347646.pdf.Google Scholar
  67. Olijnyk, Z. 2003‘The Professional’Canadian Business765153Google Scholar
  68. Oz, E. 1993‘Ethical Standards for Computer Professionals: A Comparative Analysis of Four Major Codes’Journal of Business Ethics12709726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Patterson, W.: 2003, ‘What’s Your Solution? We Asked Some Experts, and Here’s What They Said’, Wall Street Journal, R8.Google Scholar
  70. Pinnacle West Capital Corporation: 2003, ‘Corporate Governance Guidelines’, http://www.pinnaclewest.com/main/pnw/AboutUs/commitments/governance/guidelines/default.html.Google Scholar
  71. Pitney Bowes: 2003, ‘Governance Principles of the Board of Directors’, http://www.pb.com.Google Scholar
  72. Posner, B. Z., Schmidt, W. H. 1987‘Ethics in American Companies: A Managerial Perspective’Journal of Business Ethics6383391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pratt, C. B. 1991‘Public Relations: The Empirical Research on Practitioner Ethics’Journal of Business Ethics10229236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pratt, C. B. 1994‘Research Progress in Public Relations Ethics: An Overview’Public Relations Review20217224Google Scholar
  75. Rapoport, A. 1989‘The Redemption of Science’Journal of Business Ethics8157165Google Scholar
  76. Rideout, T. P. 1989‘For Tomorrow’s Bank Managers: Some Banking Trends Not to Be Ignored’Vital Speeches56153155Google Scholar
  77. Sara Lee Corporation: 2003, ‘Corporate Governance Guidelines’, http://investors.saralee.com/downloads/corpgov_guidelines.pdf.Google Scholar
  78. Sarbanes-Oxley Act: 2002, http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/gwbush/sarbanesoxley072302.pdf.Google Scholar
  79. Schinin, R. 1989‘Women as Scientists: Their Rights and Obligations’Journal of Business Ethics8131155Google Scholar
  80. Schmukler, E.: 2003, ‘Corporate Governance (A Special Report) – Back To School: How Does A Company Get Better Directors? Maybe The Answer Is To Teach The Directors Themselves To Be Better’, Wall Street Journal R6.Google Scholar
  81. Schreurs, M. J. 1999Fall, ‘VonFeldt v. Stifel Financial Corp. Clarifying the Scope of Delaware Corporate Indemnification Law’Journal of Corporation Law25161179Google Scholar
  82. Schroeder, D. 2002‘Ethics From the Top: Top Management and Ethical Business’Business Ethics: A European Review11260267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schwartz, M. S. 2002‘A Code of Ethics for Corporate Codes of Ethics’Journal of Business Ethics412744Google Scholar
  84. Senate Report: 2002, ‘The Role of the Board of Directors in Enron’s Collapse’ Report prepared by the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigation of the Committee on Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate, Report 107–170.Google Scholar
  85. Sharplin, A., Premeaus, S. R., Binning, M. J., Worley, L. F. 1992‘Business Ethics: A Primer for Managers’Journal of Property Management574245Google Scholar
  86. Shmitt, C. J., E. Barnes and M. Barnett: 2002, ‘One Cozy Bunch’, U.S. News and World Report, 28, Feb, 11.Google Scholar
  87. Siebens, H. 2002‘Concepts and Working Instruments for Corporate Governance’Journal of Business Ethics39109116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Singapore Institute of Directors, www.sid.org.sg/about_code/php.Google Scholar
  89. Souter, G. M., McNeil, M., Molster, C. 1994‘The Impact of the Work Environment on Ethical Decision Making: Some Australian Evidence’Journal of Business Ethics13327339Google Scholar
  90. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R. 2003Managing Ethics in Business OrganizationsStanford University PressStanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  91. U.S. Conference Board: 2003, ‘Top Ethics Officers Say They Don’t Train Their Boards in Ethics’, http://www.conference-board.org/knowledge/knowledgePress.cfm?press_id=2174.Google Scholar
  92. Van Wezel Stone, K.: 1991, ‘Employees as Stakeholders Under State Nonshareholder Statutes’, 21 Stetson L. Rev. 45.Google Scholar
  93. Veasey, N. 2003Spring, ‘State-Federal Tension in Corporate Governance and the Professional Responsibilities of Advisors’Journal of Corporation Law28441454Google Scholar
  94. Vinten, G. 1998, ‘Corporate Governance: An International State of the art,’ Management Auditing Journal, 419–431 in P. A. Stanwick and S. D. Stanwick: 2002, Winter, ‘The Relationship Between Corporate Governance and Financial Performance’, The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 8, 35–48.Google Scholar
  95. Wade, C. L. 2002Fall, ‘Corporate Governance Failures and the Managerial Duty of Care’St. John’s Law Review76767786Google Scholar
  96. Walsh, J. T. 2002Spring, ‘The Fiduciary Foundation of Corporate Law’Journal of Corporation Law27333341Google Scholar
  97. Weaver, J.: 2002, ‘Lay May Face Insider Trading Charges’, http://www.msnbc.com/news/799703.asp.Google Scholar
  98. Weil, G., and Manges: 2002, ‘Comparative Study of Corporate Governance Codes Relevant to the European Union and its Member States’, European Commission.Google Scholar
  99. Westphal, J. D. 1999‘Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties’Academy of Management Journal42724Google Scholar
  100. Zahra, S. A., Pearce, J. A.,II 1989‘Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model’Journal of Management15291334Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark S. Schwartz
    • 1
  • Thomas W. Dunfee
    • 2
  • Michael J. Kline
    • 3
  1. 1.Schulich School of BusinessYork UniversityOntarioCanada
  2. 2.Legal Studies Department, The Wharton SchoolUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaU.S.A
  3. 3.Princeton Pike Corporate CenterFox Rothschild LLPLawrencevilleU.S.A

Personalised recommendations