Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 209–219 | Cite as

Trust and Dialogue: Theoretical Approaches to Ethics Auditing

Article

Abstract.

The aim of this paper is to put forward an ethical framework for the conceptualization and development of ethics audits, here understood as a catalyst for company dialogue and in general, for management of ethics in the company. Ethics auditing is understood as the opportunity and agreement to devise a system to inform on ethical corporate behavior. This system essentially aims to increase the transparency and credibility of the company’s commitment to ethics. At the same time, the process of elaborating this system allows us to introduce the moral dimension into company actions and decisions, thereby completing a key dimension of the production, maintenance and development of trust capital. To this end, the following four steps are taken. First, we analyze the relation between ethics auditing and trust as a basic moral resource in the dialogue between the company and its various stakeholders. Second, we examine the social balance sheet as a precursor to ethics auditing and focus on what prevents it from going further. Third, we attempt to reconstruct the basic moral assumptions underlying the company’s social responsibility from the discourse ethics approach. Finally, we present a methodological framework from which to carry out our proposal, which embraces two basic theoretical perspectives stakeholder theory and the values derived from discourse ethics as a normative framework.

Keywords

ethics audit business dialogue trust discourse ethics corporate social responsibility stakeholder approach 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apel, K.-O. 1988Diskurs und VerantwortungSuhrkampFrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  2. Banco de, Bilbao 1982El balance social de la empresa y las instituciones financierasMadridBilbaoGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber B. (1983). The Logic and Limits of Trust Rugers. New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  4. Carmona Guillén J.A. (1977). Los indicadores sociales hoy CIS. MadridGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll, A. B. 1989Business and Society. Ethics and Stakeholder Management.South-Western PublishingCincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  6. Chevalier, A. 1977El balance social de la empresaForum Universidad-EmpresaMadridGoogle Scholar
  7. Cortina, A. 1986Ética mínimaTecnosMadridGoogle Scholar
  8. Cortina, A. 1998Hasta un pueblo de demoniosTaurusMadridGoogle Scholar
  9. Cortina, A., Conill, J., Domingo, A., García-Marzá, D. 1994Ética de la empresaClaves para una nueva cultura empresarial. TrottaMadridGoogle Scholar
  10. Dierkes, M. 1975

    ‘La empresa como institución social’

    García Echevarria, S. eds. La política económica de la empresaESICMadrid
    Google Scholar
  11. Dierkes, M. 1985Balance social. Teoría Práctica, Vol. 101 (Instituto de Dirección y Organización de Empresas.Working PapersMadridGoogle Scholar
  12. Donaldson, T., Dunfee, T.W. 1999Ties that BindA social contract approach to Business Ethics. Harvard Business School PressBostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Enderle, G. 1996‘A Comparison of Business Ethics in North America and Continental Europe’Business Ethics. A European Review53346Google Scholar
  14. European Commission: 2001, ‘Promoting A European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility’, COM (2001) 366 final (Brussels, 18.7.2001)Google Scholar
  15. European Commission: 2002, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility. A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development’, COM (2002) 347 final (Brussels, 2.7.2002)Google Scholar
  16. Freeman, R. E. 1984Strategic Management: A Stakeholder ApproachPitmanBostonGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedman, M. 1966Capitalismo y libertadRialpMadridGoogle Scholar
  18. Garcia Echevarria, S. 1982Responsabilidad social y balance social de la empresaMapfreMadridGoogle Scholar
  19. García-Marzá, D. 1992Ética de la justiciaHabermas y la ética del discurso. TecnosMadridGoogle Scholar
  20. García-Marzá, D. 2004Ética empresarial: del diálogo a la confianzaTrottaMadridGoogle Scholar
  21. Giddens, A. 1990The Consequences of ModernityPolity PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. González, E. 2002‘Defining a Post-Conventional Corporate Moral Responsibility’Journal of Business Ethics39101108Google Scholar
  23. Habermas, J. 1991Escritos sobre moralidad y eticidadPaidósBarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  24. Hosmer, L.T. 1995‘Trust: The Connecting Link between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics’Academy of Management Review20379403Google Scholar
  25. Land, K.C. and Spilerman S. (Comps.): 1975, Social Indicators Models (Russel Sage F., New York)Google Scholar
  26. LeMouël, J. 1992Critica de la eficaciaPaidosBarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  27. Mackenzie, C. 1998‘Ethical Auditing and Ethical Knowledge’Journal of Business Ethics1713951402Google Scholar
  28. Morgan, C. 1990Images of OrganizationSage PublicationsLondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosthorn, J. 2000‘Business Ethics Auditing – More Than a Stakeholder’s Toy’Journal of Business Ethics27919Google Scholar
  30. Schwartz, P. 1981Empresa y libertad .Unión EditorialMadridGoogle Scholar
  31. Ulrich, P. 1993Transformation der ökonomischen VernunftHauptStuttgartGoogle Scholar
  32. Vallance, E. 1995Business Ethics at WorkCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Weiss, J.W. 1994Business EthicsA Managerial Stakeholder Approach. Wadsworth Publishing CompanyCaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  34. Yuthas, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Filosofía, Sociología y Comunicación Audiovisual y PublicidadUniversitat Jaume ICastellónSpain

Personalised recommendations