Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 99–129 | Cite as

Investing in Socially Responsible Companies is a must for Public Pension Funds – Because there is no Better Alternative

Article

Abstract

>With assets of over US$1.0 trillion and growing, public pension funds in the United States have become a major force in the private sector through their holding of equity positions in large publicly traded corporations. More recently, these funds have been expanding their investment strategy by considering a corporation’s long-term risks on issues such as environmental protection, sustainability, and good corporate citizenship, and how these factors impact a company’s long-term performance. Conventional wisdom argues that the fiduciary responsibility of the pension funds’ trustees must be solely focused on their beneficiaries and, therefore, their investment criteria must be based strictly on narrowly defined financial measures. It is also asserted that well-established financial measurements of corporate performance already include long-term risk assessment through discounted present value of future flow of earnings. Consequently, all other criteria are contrary to the best interest of the pension funds’ beneficiaries. In this paper, we assert that, contrary to conventional wisdom, pension funds, and for that matter other mutual funds, must be concerned with the long-term survival and growth of corporations. These measures are generally referred to “socially responsible investing’’ (SRI) and when applied to corporations, it is termed “socially responsible corporate conduct (SRCC).” We demonstrate that current measurement of future risk assessment invariably understates, and quite often completely overlooks, these long-term risks because of the inherent bias towards short-run on the part of financial intermediaries whose compensation depends greatly on short-term results. Furthermore, there is ample evidence to suggest that these intermediaries have been engaging in self-serving practices and thus failing in their duties to serve their clients’, i.e. pension funds’, best interests. Because of their large holdings in the total market as well as individual companies, these funds cannot easily divest from poorly performing companies without destabilizing the companies’ stock and overall markets. Hence, they must opt for a strategy of emphasizing investment criteria that encourage companies to take into account long-term aspects of their operations in terms of their impact on environment, sustainability, and community welfare, to name a few. We argue that an exclusionary, and even a primary, focus on short-term financial criteria is no longer a viable option. It also calls for the pension funds to encourage greater transparency and accountability of the entire corporate sector through improved corporate governance. Thus socially responsible investing practices are not merely discretionary and desirable activities; they are a necessary imperative, which both the corporations and public pension funds, and other large institutional holders, will ignore at serious peril to themselves. Finally, the paper considers some of the recent developments where corporations have been responding to these challenges and how their actions might be strengthened through greater disclosure and transparency of corporate activities. It also makes recommendations for the pension funds to support further research in creating new measurement standards that further refine the concept of socially responsible investing as a necessary ingredient of long-term corporate survival and growth in the context of a changing economic, environmental and socio-political dynamic.

Keywords

socially responsible investing (SRI) socially responsible corporate conduct (SRCC) public pension funds corporate governance free rider public goods financial intermediaries 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akhigbe, A., Madura, J., Tucker, A. L. 1995‘Reexamining the Link Between Executive Compensation and Corporate Performance: A Note’American Business Review138390Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, G., Buchholtz, R. 1978‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance’Academy of Management Journal21479486Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, G.: 1995, ‘Merrill ‘squeezed’ Orange County’, Sunday Times (January).Google Scholar
  4. American Trust Allegiance (http://www.amertrust.com).Google Scholar
  5. Angel, J. J., Rivoli, P. 1997‘Does Ethical Investing Impose a Cost Upon the Firm? A theoretical perspective”Journal of Investing65761Google Scholar
  6. Annandale, D., Morrison-Saunders, A., Bouma, G. 2004‘The Impact of Voluntary Environmental Protection Instruments on Company Environmental Performance’Business Strategy and the Environment13112Google Scholar
  7. Ariel Fund (http://www.arielmutualfunds.com).Google Scholar
  8. Arrington, G. R. 1999‘Socially Conscious Investments by Private Pension Plans’Employee Benefits Journal241316Google Scholar
  9. Arnott, R., Greenwald, B., Kanbur, R., Nalebuff, B. 2003‘Economics for an Imperfect World: Essays in Honor of Joseph E. Stiglitz’The Massachusetts Institute of Technology PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Attaway, M. C. 2000’A Study of Relationship Between Company Performance and CEO Compensation’American Business Review187786Google Scholar
  11. Baltzel, H.: ‘8Refuting Media Bias Against SRI–Why the New York Times got it wrong about a recent Wharton study’ Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility Report, www.business-ethics.com.Google Scholar
  12. Bank of America to pay $69-million in Enron suit (2004, July). Reuter News Agency.Google Scholar
  13. Barrientos, S. 2000‘Globalization And Ethical Trade: Assessing The Implications For Development’Journal of International Development12559570Google Scholar
  14. Basar, S.: 2003, ‘Accountancy fees at risk from Sarbanes-Oxley’, Financial News (February).Google Scholar
  15. Bator, F. E. 1958‘Anatomy of Market Failure’Quarterly Journal of Economics(August)351379Google Scholar
  16. Baumol, W. 1991Perfect Markets and Easy VirtueBlackwellCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  17. Bebchuk, L. A.: 2003, ‘The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power’, Harvard Law Review (December).Google Scholar
  18. Bell, S., Morse, S. 2004‘Experiences with Sustainability Indicators and Stakeholder Participation: A Case Study Relating to a ‘Blue Plan’ Project in Malta’Sustainable Development12114Google Scholar
  19. Berry, K., Taylor, N. 2003‘Executive Pay at Largest Firms Rises While Performance Dips’Los Angeles Business Journal2513Google Scholar
  20. Bhagwati, J. 1998’A Stream of Windows: Unsettling, Reflections on Trade, Immigration, and Democracy’,The MIT PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Borrus, A.: and L. Young 2004, ‘Nothing Like a Little Exposure: Now That Funds Must Reveal Their Proxy Reports, They’re Challenging CEOs and Boards’, Business Week, 92.Google Scholar
  22. Brandt, J. R.: ‘Pay for performance?’ IndustryWeek.com www.industryweek.com (Sept. 01, 1997).Google Scholar
  23. Brickey, K. F. 2003‘From Enron to Worldcom and Beyond: Life and Crime after Sarbanes-Oxley’Washington University Law Quarterly81357401Google Scholar
  24. Brinson, G. P., Hood, L. R., Beebower, G. L. 1986‘Determinants of Portfolio Performance’Financial Analysts Journal423944Google Scholar
  25. Bruhl, R. H. 2003’A Possible Solution to the Principal-Agent Problem Posed by Contemporary Corporate CEO’Journal of Business Ethics48401402Google Scholar
  26. Bruno, K. and J. Karliner: 2000, ‘Tangle Up in Blue: Corporate Partnerships at the United Nations’, CorpWatch, www.corpwatch.org.Google Scholar
  27. Buckley, P. J.: 2003, ‘The Changing Global Context of International Business’ (Palgrave Macmillan Ltd).Google Scholar
  28. ‘Business Codes in Belgium 2002’, KPMG Belgium (2002); For reference please see codes of conduct of Fair Labor Organization (www.fairlabor.org), International Council of Toy Industry (www.toy-icti.org), International Council on Mining and Minerals (www.icmm.org), to name a few.Google Scholar
  29. CalPERS (www.calpers.ca.gov/).Google Scholar
  30. CalSTRS (www.calstrs.com).Google Scholar
  31. Calvert social index (http://www.calvert.com/sri_calvertindex.asp).Google Scholar
  32. Calvert Social Investment Fund Equity Portfolio http://www.calvertgroup.com.Google Scholar
  33. ‘Can Socially Responsible Investments Compete?’ University of Calgary (www.ucalgary.ca).Google Scholar
  34. Carman, J. M. and R. G. Harris: 1991,’The Political Economy of Regulation: An Analysis of Regulatory Responses”, in S. P. Sethi, P. Steidlmeier and C. M. Falbe (eds.), ‘Scaling the Corporate Wall: Readings in Social Issues of the Nineties’ (Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 24–56.Google Scholar
  35. Carpenter, M.A., Sanders, W.M.G. 2002‘Top Management Team Compensation: The Missing Link Between CEO Pay And Firm Performance?’Strategic Management Journal23367375Google Scholar
  36. “CEO Pay Tomorrow: Same as Today”, Business Week.com, www.businessweek.com, News Analysis (Aug. 21, 2002).Google Scholar
  37. ChevronTexaco http://www.chevrontexaco.com.Google Scholar
  38. Cohen, M. A., S. A. Fenn, S. Konar and J. S. Naimon: 1997, ‘Environmental and Financial Performance: are they related?’ Vanderbilt Center for Environmental Management Studies (Working Paper).Google Scholar
  39. Cox, P., Brammer, S., Millington, A. 2004‘An Empirical Examination of Institutional Investor Preferences for Corporate Social Performance’Journal of Business Ethics522743Google Scholar
  40. ‘Criticisms of Socially Responsible Investing’, University of Calgary, www.ucalgary.ca.Google Scholar
  41. Crowe, B. L. 1969‘The Tragedy of the Commons Revisited’Science16611031107Google Scholar
  42. Cziborr, C. 2004‘Accounting For Reform’Orange County Business Journal272429Google Scholar
  43. D’Antonio, L., T. Johnsen, R., Hutton, B. 1997‘Expanding Socially Screened Portfolios: An Attribution Analysis of Bond Performance’Journal of Investing67986Google Scholar
  44. Dawkins, J., Stewart, L. 2003‘CSR in Stakeholder Expectations: and Their Implication for Company Strategy’Journal of Business Ethics44185193Google Scholar
  45. Deane, S.: 2004, ‘Business Roundtable Proposal Emphasizes Votes of Retail Investor’, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (April), http://www.issproxy.com.Google Scholar
  46. DeBaise, C. 2004‘Merrill Manager Gives Testimony About Tyco Deal’Dow Jones NewswiresThe Asian Wall Street Journal (February)Google Scholar
  47. Dell, S. 1990‘The United Nations and international Business’Duke University PressDurham, N.C.Google Scholar
  48. Dillenburg, S., Greene, T., Erekson, H. 2003‘Approaching Socially Responsible Investing with a Comprehensive Ratings Scheme: Total Social Impact’Journal of Business Ethics43167177Google Scholar
  49. ‘Does Socially Responsible Investing Hurt Investment Returns?’ Phillips, Hager & North Investment Management Ltd.,http://www.phn.com/pdfs/SRI%20Articles/ does_sri_hurt.pdf (Sept. 2003).Google Scholar
  50. Domini Social Investments (http://www.domini.com/).Google Scholar
  51. Dow Jones Global Sustainability Index (http://www.sustainability-indexes.com/).Google Scholar
  52. Dubbink, W. 2004‘The Fragile Structure of Free-market Society: The Radical Implications of Corporate Social Responsibility’Business Ethics Quarterly142346Google Scholar
  53. Dunfee, T.W. 2003‘Social Investing: Mainstream or Backwater?’Journal of Business Ethics43247252Google Scholar
  54. Eisenhardt, K. M.: 1989, ‘Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review’, The Academy of Management Review 14(1) (January).Google Scholar
  55. Entine, J. 2003‘The Myth of Social Investing: A Critique of its Practice and Consequences for Corporate Social Performance Research’Organization & Environment16352368Google Scholar
  56. Entine, J.: 2004, ‘US Pension Funds and Fiduciary Irresponsibility’, Ethical Corporation Magazine, http://www.jonentine.com (January).Google Scholar
  57. Equator principles (www.equator-principles.com).Google Scholar
  58. The Extractive Industries Review (www.eireview.org).Google Scholar
  59. The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (www.dfid.gov.uk).Google Scholar
  60. Federal Retirement Thrift (www.ifebp.org).Google Scholar
  61. Feldman, S., Soyka, P., Ameer, P. 1997‘Does Improving a Firm’s Environmental Management System and Environment Performance Result in Higher Stock Price?’Journal of Investing68797Google Scholar
  62. Florida State Board (www.sbafla.com).Google Scholar
  63. FTSE4Good (http://www.ftse.com/ftse4good/index.jsp).Google Scholar
  64. Fuhrmann, S.: 2004, ‘Corporate Philanthropy in Unfriendly Times: The Consequences of Social Investing Advocacy’, paper presented at the seminar ‘Socially Responsible’ Investing and Pension Funds: Welcome Reform or Fiduciary Nightmare?” organized by American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C., www.aei.org (June).Google Scholar
  65. Gay, G. R. and J. A. Klaassen: 2004, ‘Retirement Investment, Fiduciary Obligations, and Socially Responsible Investing’, paper presented at the seminar ‘Socially Responsible’ Investing and Pension Funds: Welcome Reform or Fiduciary Nightmare?” organized by American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C., http://www.aei.org (June). Mr. Gay, et al. in turn have attributed this definition to␣Keefe, J. F., member of the Board of Directors of Social Investment Forum, an industry association. www.newcirclecom.com.Google Scholar
  66. Geczy, C., R. F. Stambaughand, D. Levin: 2003, ‘Investing in Socially Responsible Mutual Funds’, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, http://finance.wharton.upenn.edu (May).Google Scholar
  67. Gelb, D. S., Strawser, J. A. 2001‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Disclosures: An Alternative Explanation for Increased Disclosure’Journal of Business Ethics,33113Google Scholar
  68. General Electric (www.cashpensions.com).Google Scholar
  69. General Motors (www.freep.com).Google Scholar
  70. Gerald, T. G. and T. T. Milbourn: 2003, ‘Asymmetric Benchmarking in Compensation’, Social Science Research Network, Working Paper Series, http://papers.ssrn.com (September).Google Scholar
  71. Global Compact (www.unglobalcompact.org).Google Scholar
  72. Goodpaster, K. E. 2003‘Some Challenges of Social Screening’Journal of Business Ethics43239246Google Scholar
  73. Graff, G. M.: 2003, ‘Social Investing’, John Harvard’s Journal, www.harvardmagazine.com (July–August).Google Scholar
  74. Greaney, T. L. 2003‘Looking Beyond the Evildoers: Sarbanes-Oxley and the Future of Corporate Law’Saint Louis University Law Journal47961966Google Scholar
  75. Guay, T., Doh, J. P., Sinclair, G. 2004‘Non-Governmental Organizations, Shareholder Activism and Socially Responsible Investments: Ethical, Strategic and Governance Implications’Journal of Business Ethics52125139Google Scholar
  76. Guerard, J.B. 1997‘Is There a Cost to Being Socially Responsible in Investing?’Journal of Investing61118Google Scholar
  77. Guerard, J.B.,Jr., Stone , B.K. 2002‘Social Screening Does Not Harm Performance’Pensions & Investments303031Google Scholar
  78. Gullapalli, D.: 2004, ‘Moving the Market – Tracking the Numbers/Street Sleuth: On Governance, Wall Street May Carry Big Stick – After a Report by Goldman, Companies Make Changes; Right Role for Sell Side‘?’ The Wall Street Journal (August).Google Scholar
  79. Hall, B.J., Liebman, J.B. 1998‘Are CEOs Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?’Quarterly Journal of Economics113653692Google Scholar
  80. Hall, E.: 1999, ‘How do Socially Responsible Funds Stack up?’ www.morningstar.com (June).Google Scholar
  81. Hall, E.: 1999, ‘Vanguard Heats Up Competition with New Social Index Fund’, www.morningstar.com (December).Google Scholar
  82. Hallinan, J. T.: 2004, ‘It Still Pays to be a Conseco CEO’, The Wall Street Journal (August).Google Scholar
  83. Hamilton, S., Jo, H. 1993‘Doing Well While Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds’Financial Analysts Journal496266Google Scholar
  84. Hardin, G. 1968‘The Tragedy of the Commons’Science16212431248Google Scholar
  85. Harris, R. G. and J. M. Carman: ‘The Political Economy of Regulation: An Analysis of Market Failures’.Google Scholar
  86. Herbert, P.: 2003, ‘Find Winning Socially Responsible Funds’, MorningStar.com, www.morningstar.com, (April).Google Scholar
  87. Hickey, C.: 2000 ‘2000 Update: How Do Socially Responsible Funds Stand’, MorningStar.com, www.morningstar.com (October).Google Scholar
  88. Hickey, C.: 2000 ‘Socially-Responsible Funds’, MorningStar.com, www.morningstar.com (December).Google Scholar
  89. Hickman, K.A., Teets, W.R. 1999‘social Investing and Modern Portfolio Theory’American Business Review177278Google Scholar
  90. Hodgson, B. J. 2001‘Can the Beast Be Tamed?: Reflections on John McMurtry’s Unequal Freedoms: The Global Market as an Ethical System’Journal of Business Ethics337178Google Scholar
  91. HSBC (http://www.hsbc.com).Google Scholar
  92. Hutton, R.B., D’Antonio, L., Johnsen, T. 1998‘Socially Responsible Investing: Growing Issues and New Opportunities’Business& Society37281305Google Scholar
  93. Hutton, W., MacDougall, A., Zadek, S. 2001‘Session 3–Topics in Business Ethics–Corporate Stakeholding, Ethical Investment, Social Accounting’Journal of Business Ethics32107117Google Scholar
  94. International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) guidelines for International Investment (1972).Google Scholar
  95. ‘Introduction to SRI’, SocialFunds.com (personal finance site devoted to socially responsible investing), www.socialfunds.com.Google Scholar
  96. Introduction to the conference on ‘Socially Responsible’ Investing and Pension Funds: Welcome Reform or Fiduciary Nightmare?’ organized by American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C., www.aei.org (June 7, 2004).Google Scholar
  97. Iwata, E. and Hansen, B.: 2004, ‘Pay, Performance Don’t Always Add Up’, USA Today.com, www.usatoday.com (April).Google Scholar
  98. Iwata, E.: 2004, ‘Businesses Say Corporate Governance Can Go Too Far; Measuring up to New Rules Can be Costly, Unfair’, USA Today (June).Google Scholar
  99. Janney, J. J., Paul, K. 2001‘An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective’Journal of Business Ethics32143156Google Scholar
  100. Jenkins, R. 2004‘Globalization, production, Employment and Poverty: Debates and Evidence’Journal of International Development16112Google Scholar
  101. Jensen, M. C., Murphy, K. J. 1990‘Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives’Journal of Political Economy98225265Google Scholar
  102. Jereski, L., G. B. Knecht, T. T. Vogel Jr. and A. Pasztor: 1994, ‘Bitter Fruit: Orange County, Mired in Investment Mess, Files for Bankruptcy – Decision, Following Default on Reverse-Repo Deals, May put Assets in Limbo – How County Got into this’, Wall Street Journal (December). Google Scholar
  103. Johnsen, D. B. 2003‘Socially Responsible Investing: A Critical Appraisal’Journal of Business Ethics,43219222Google Scholar
  104. Johnson, S.: ‘Pension Funds Push Big Business to Go Green’, Planet Ark, home of Reuters Daily World Environment News, http://www.planetark.org/ avantgo/.Google Scholar
  105. Jones, R.: 2004, ‘A green tide is seen rising on Wall Street-Environmentalists and investment pros see opportunities’, www.msnbc.com (April).Google Scholar
  106. Jones, S. D.: 2003, ‘ISS:Cash For Airborne Hldrs Outweighs Anti-Takeover Terms’, Dow Jones News Service (August).Google Scholar
  107. Keefe, J., Lydenberg, C. S. D. 2003‘Corporate Governance, Social Responsibility, and Obligations of Ownership’Social Investment Forum & Co-opAmerica,Background Paper for State Treasurers and Legislators, www.socialinvest.org (September)Google Scholar
  108. Kell, G., Tesner, S. 2000‘The United Nations and Business’,St. Martin’s PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  109. Kim, B. 2003‘Recent Development: SARBANES-OXLEY ACT’Harvard Journal on Legislation40235252Google Scholar
  110. Kinder, P. D., Domini, A. L. 1997‘Social Screening: Paradigms Old and New’Journal of Investing61220Google Scholar
  111. Kinder, P. D.: 2004, ‘Pensions & the Companies They Own: New Fiduciary Duties in a Changing Social Environment’, paper presented at the seminar ‘Socially Responsible’ Investing and Pension Funds: Welcome Reform or Fiduciary Nightmare?’’ organized by American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C., www.aei.org (June). Google Scholar
  112. Kinnel, R and C. Hickey: 2000, ‘Will SRI Funds Give Microsoft the Boot?’ MorningStar.com, www.morningstar.com (October).Google Scholar
  113. Kinnel, R.: ‘Vanguard and TIAA-CREF: 2000, Masters of the SRI Universe’, MorningStar.com, www.morningstar.com (November). Google Scholar
  114. Kline, J.: 2004, ‘MNC Codes and National Sovereignty: Deciding When MNCs Should Engage in Political Activity’, paper presented at ICCA Conference on ‘Voluntary Codes of Conduct for Multinational Corporations: Promises and Challenges’ New York (May). Google Scholar
  115. Kolk, A. and R. Tulder: 2004, ‘Multinationals and Codes of Conduct: Dynamics and Effectiveness’, paper presented at ICCA Conference on ‘Voluntary Codes of Conduct for Multinational Corporations: Promises and Challenges’ New York (May). Google Scholar
  116. Kolk, A. 2003‘Trends in Sustainability Reporting by the Fortune Global 250’Business Strategy and the Environment12279291Google Scholar
  117. Krumsiek, B. the Calvert Social Research Department2003‘Socially Responsible High Tech Companies: Emerging Issues’Journal of Business Ethics43179187Google Scholar
  118. Kurtz, L., DiBartolomeo, D. 1996‘Socially Screened Portfolios: An Attribution Analysis of Relative Performance’Journal of Investing63541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Lal, D.: 1998, ‘Unintended Consequences’, (The MIT Press).Google Scholar
  120. Langbein, J. H., Posner, R. 1980‘Social Investing and the Law of Trusts’79 Michigan Law Review727396Google Scholar
  121. Laufer, W. S. 2003‘Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing’Journal of Business Ethics43253261Google Scholar
  122. Laufer, W. S. 2003‘Social Screening of Investments: An Introduction’Journal of Business Ethics43163165Google Scholar
  123. Lavelle, L.: 2001, ‘The CEO Gravy Train Just Got Derailed’, Business Week.com, www.businessweek (November). Google Scholar
  124. Lenox, M. J., Nash, J. 2003‘Industry Self-Regulation and Adverse Selection: A Comparison Across Four Trade Association Programs’Business Strategy and the Environment12343356Google Scholar
  125. Levitt, A. and P. Dwyer: 2002, ‘Take on The Street: What Wall Street and Corporate America Don’t Want to Know’, (Pantheon Books).Google Scholar
  126. ‘Link CEO pay to performance’, Controller Steve Westly, State of California, www.sco.ca.gov.Google Scholar
  127. Lloyd, P. J. and X. Zhang: 2000, ‘China in the Global Economy’, (Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.). Google Scholar
  128. Luck, C., Pilotte, N. 1993‘Domini Social Index Performance’Journal of Investing26062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. MacAvoy, P. W., Millstein, I. M. 2003‘The Recurrent Crisis in Corporate Governance’Palgrave MacMillanNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  130. Mancur, O. 1965‘The Logic of Collective Action’,Harvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  131. Mark and Spencer (http://www.marksandspencer.com).Google Scholar
  132. McDonald, I.: 2004, ‘Ten Fund Firms’ Proxy Votes On Pay Reflect Urging of Unions’, The Wall Street Journal (September).Google Scholar
  133. McLean, B. and P. Elkind: ‘PARTNERS IN CRIME: The untold story of how Citi, J. P. Morgan Chase, and Merrill Lynch helped Enron pull off one of the greatest scams ever’. www.fortune.com.Google Scholar
  134. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. 2000‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation Or Misspecification?’Strategic Management Journal21603609Google Scholar
  135. Michelson, G., Wailes, N., Laan, S., Frost, G. 2004‘Ethical Investment Processes and Outcomes’Journal of Business Ethics52110Google Scholar
  136. Michie, J.: 2003, ‘The Handbook of Globalisation’, (Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.). Google Scholar
  137. Mitchell, L. E. 2001‘Corporate Irresponsibility: America’s Newest Expert’Yale University PressNew Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  138. Moore, G. 2001‘Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry’Journal of Business Ethics34299315Google Scholar
  139. Morgan, T. D.: 2003, ‘Sarbanes-Oxley: A Complication, Not a Contribution, in the Effort to Improve Corporate Lawyers’ Professional Conduct’, Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. Google Scholar
  140. ‘Morgan Stanley Pays $200K to Settle Bad Advice Given to Microsoft Employees’, Financial Wire, (Aug. 02, 2004).Google Scholar
  141. Morris, C. R.: 1994, ‘Betting with Taxpayers’ Money is an Accident Waiting to Happen’, Tampa Tribune (Florida) (December).Google Scholar
  142. Munnell, A. H. and A. Sunden: 1999, ‘Investment Practices of State and Local Pension Funds: Implications for Social Security Reform’, prepared for presentation at the First Annual Joint Conference for the Retirement Research Consortium ‘New Developments in Retirement Research’ (May).Google Scholar
  143. Munnell, A. H.: 2004, ‘Social Investing: Pension Plans Should Just Say ‘No’’, paper presented at the seminar ‘Socially Responsible’ Investing and Pension Funds: Welcome Reform or Fiduciary Nightmare? organized by American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington DC, www.aei.org (June). Google Scholar
  144. ‘Mutual Funds and the U.S. Retirement Market in 2003’, Investment Company Institute 13 (2), www.ici.org, (June 2004).Google Scholar
  145. New Jersey (www.state.nj.us).Google Scholar
  146. Newmont Mining (http://www.newmont.com).Google Scholar
  147. New York State Common (www.osc.state.ny.us).Google Scholar
  148. New York State Teachers (www.nystrs.org).Google Scholar
  149. Norris, F.: 2004, ‘Institutions stumble in spotlight’, International Herald Tribune (April).Google Scholar
  150. Novo Nordisk (http://www.novonordisk.com).Google Scholar
  151. O’Connell, M. 2000‘Conflict and the Environment’Human Rights Quarterly2210991103Google Scholar
  152. Oetomo, T. and P. L. Swan: 2002, ‘Can Managerial Superiority Explain High Executive Pay in Large Firms? Evidence Supportive of Rosen’s ‘cloning’ Hypothesis’, Social Science Research Network, UNSW School of Banking and Finance Faculty of Commerce Working Paper, http://papers.ssrn.com (January). Google Scholar
  153. Olive, D.: 2004, ‘How do CEOs Measure Up? Executive Compensation is up. A lot. Again. Is There Really Any Value in Paying Big Bucks to the Boss?’ The Toronto Star (May).Google Scholar
  154. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Charter (www.oecd.org).Google Scholar
  155. Orlitzky, M.: ‘Does Firm Size Confound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance?’ Journal of Business Ethics 33 (2), 167–180.Google Scholar
  156. ‘Over 70% of the Largest Socially Responsible Mutual Funds got Top Marks from Morningstar, Lipper in 2003’, Social Investment Forum News, www.socialinvest.org (Jan. 27, 2004).Google Scholar
  157. Paredes, T. A. 2003‘After The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: The Future of The Mandatory Disclosure System’Washington University Law Quarterly81229242Google Scholar
  158. Parnassus Equity Income Fund (http://www.parnassus.com).Google Scholar
  159. Pasztor, A., Emshwiller, J. R. and C. Gasparino: 1998, ‘Merrill Lynch to Pay $437.1 Million to Resolve Claims by Orange County’, (June).Google Scholar
  160. PAX World Growth Fund (http://www.paxworld.com). ‘Pension Fund Shenanigans’, Review and Outlook (Editorial), The Wall Street Journal, (Aug. 20, 2004).Google Scholar
  161. Perel, M. 2003‘An Ethical Perspective on CEO Compensation’Journal of Business Ethics48381391Google Scholar
  162. Pollack, A. and L. Wayne: 1998, ‘Ending Suit, Merrill Lynch to Pay California County $400 Million’, The New York Times (June). Google Scholar
  163. Principles, Profits or Just PR? Triple P Investments under the Equator Principles’, BankTrack (June 2004).Google Scholar
  164. Ramcharran, H. 2002‘Firm Size and Executive Compensation: The Impact of the Foreign Operations on US Companies’Multinational Business Review10138145Google Scholar
  165. Reeves Jr., W. T. and N. Maiale: 2004, ‘Protecting Shareholders is No ‘Shenanigan’’, Letters to the Editor, The Wall Street Journal (September). Google Scholar
  166. Reeves, P.: 1994, ‘Did ‘the Lemon’ Break Orange County’s Bank?’, The Independent (December).Google Scholar
  167. Rivoli, P. 2003‘Making a Difference or Making a Statement? Finance Research and Socially Responsible Investment’Business Ethics Quarterly13271288Google Scholar
  168. Rocco, W. S.: 2000, ‘It’s Still Challenging to Build a Diversified SRI ‘, MorningStar.com, www.morningstar. com (December). Google Scholar
  169. Rocco, W. S.: 2002, ‘SRI Fans Should Be Flexible When Venturing Abroad’, MorningStar.com, www. morningstar.com (July). Google Scholar
  170. Rounds, C. E.: 2004, ‘Public Pension Funds, Charitable Funds, And The Social Security Trust Fund: When The State Gets Into The Investment Business, Social Investing Is Inevitable And There Is Little The Law Can Do About It’, paper presented at a conference ‘Socially Responsible’ Investing and Pension Funds: Welcome Reform or Fiduciary Nightmare?’’ organized by American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington D.C., www.aei.org (June). Google Scholar
  171. Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J. J., Paul, K. 2001‘An empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective’Journal of Business Ethics32143156Google Scholar
  172. Schaefer, S. 1998‘The Dependence of Pay- Performance Sensitivity on the Size of the Firm’Review of Economics & Statistics80436443Google Scholar
  173. Schelling, T. C.: 1971, ‘On the Ecology of Micromotives’. The Public Interest.Google Scholar
  174. Schepers, D., Sethi, S. P. 2003‘Do Socially Responsible Funds Actually Deliver What They Promise? Bridging the Gap between the Promise and Performance of Socially Responsible Funds’Business and Society Review1081132Google Scholar
  175. Schueth, S. J.: 2004, ‘SRI in the US’, First Affirmative Financial Network, LLC, www.firstaffirmative.com. Google Scholar
  176. Schueth, S. 2003‘Socially Responsible Investing in the United States’Journal of Business Ethics43189194Google Scholar
  177. Schwartz, M. S. 2003‘The ‘Ethics’ of Ethical Investing’Journal of Business Ethics43195213Google Scholar
  178. Schwartz, M. S.: 2004, ‘A Proposed Set of Universal Moral Values for Corporate Codes of Ethics’, paper presented at ICCA Conference on ‘Voluntary Codes of Conduct for Multinational Corporations: Promises and Challenges’ New York (May). Google Scholar
  179. Scott, B. R. 2001‘The Great Divide in the Global Village’Foreign Affairs80160177Google Scholar
  180. Sethi, S. P., Williams, O. 2000‘Economic Imperatives and Ethical Values in Global Business: The South African Experience and International Codes Today’Kluwer Academic PublishersBostonGoogle Scholar
  181. Sethi, S. P.Steidlmeier, P.Falbe, C. M. eds. 1991’A Conceptual Framework for Environmental Analysis of Social Issues and Evaluation of Business Response Patterns’, in Scaling The Corporate Wall: Readings In Social Issues of The Nineties’Prentice Hall Inc.Englewood Cliffs, NJ7789Google Scholar
  182. Sethi, S. P. 1994 ‘Imperfect Markets: Business Ethics as an Easy Virtue’.Journal of Business Ethics13803815Google Scholar
  183. Sethi, S. P. 2002‘Corporate Codes of Conduct and the Success of Globalization’Ethics & International Affairs1689106(New York: Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs)Google Scholar
  184. Sethi, S. P. 2003‘Globalization and the Good Corporation: A Need for Proactive Co-existence’Journal of Business Ethics432131Google Scholar
  185. Sethi, S. P.: 2003, ‘Setting Global Standards: Guidelines for Creating Codes of Conduct for Multinational Corporations’, (John Wiley & Sons, Inc). Google Scholar
  186. Sethi, S. P. 1994

    ‘The Notion of the ‘Good Corporation’ in a Competitive Global Economy–Moving from a Social Responsible to a Socially Accountable Corporation’

    Houck, John W.Williams, Oliver F. eds. Is the Good Corporation Dead?: Social Responsibility in a Global EconomyRowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Lanham, MA.83100
    Google Scholar
  187. Simpson, W. G., Kohers, T. 2002‘The Link Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry’Journal of Business Ethics3597109Jan. IIGoogle Scholar
  188. Sinclair, P., Walton, J. 2003‘Environmental Reporting Within The Forest and Paper Industry’Business Strategy and the Environment12 326337Google Scholar
  189. Sklair, L.: 2001, ‘The Transnational Capitalist Class’ (Blackwell Publishers).Google Scholar
  190. Smith, G. and D. Feldman: 2003, ‘Company Codes of Conduct And International Standards: An Analytical Comparison’, Part I, The World Bank Group October. Google Scholar
  191. Smith, G. and D. Feldman: 2004’Company Codes of Conduct And International Standards: An Analytical Comparison’, Part II, The World Bank Group March.Google Scholar
  192. Smith, T.: 2004, ‘Social Investing: Challenging Institutional Investors to Meet their Fiduciary Responsibilities’, in the conference on ‘‘Socially Responsible’ Investing and Pension Funds: Welcome Reform or Fiduciary Nightmare?’ organized by American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C., www.aei.org (June). Google Scholar
  193. ‘Social Investing Flow Chart’, SocialFunds.com (personal finance site devoted to socially responsible investing), www.socialfunds.com.Google Scholar
  194. ‘Socially Responsible’ Investing and Pension Funds: Welcome Reform or Fiduciary Nightmare?’ organized by American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C., www.aei.org (June 7, 2004).Google Scholar
  195. ‘Socially Responsible Mutual Funds’, SocialFunds.com (personal finance site devoted to socially responsible investing), www.socialfunds.com.Google Scholar
  196. ‘Socially Screened Investment Assets in US Up by 7% in Last Two Years’, Social Investment Forum News, News Release, www.socialinvest.org, (Dec. 04, 2003).Google Scholar
  197. Soloman, D.: 2004; Companies Complain About Cost of Corporate-Governance Rules. The Wall Street Journal, A1, February.Google Scholar
  198. Song, W, Szewczyk, S. H. 2003‘Does Coordinated Institutional Investor Activism Reverse the Fortunes of Under performing Firms?’Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis38317337Google Scholar
  199. Sparkes, R., Cowton, C. J. 2004‘The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility’Journal of Business Ethics524557Google Scholar
  200. Statman, M. 2000‘Socially Responsible Mutual Funds’Financial Analysts Journal563039Google Scholar
  201. Stiglitz, J. E.: 2003, ‘Globalization and Its Discontents’, (W.W. Norton & Company).Google Scholar
  202. Stone, B. K., J. B. Guerard Jr., M. N. Gultekin and G. Adams: 2001, ‘Socially Responsible Investment Screening: Strong Evidence of No Significant Cost for Actively Managed Portfolios’ (Social Investment Forum & Co-op America), www.socialinvest.org (June). Google Scholar
  203. Strudler, A. 2003‘On Socially Responsible Investing: A Critical Comment’Journal of Business Ethics43215217Google Scholar
  204. Stuart, D. M. and C. F. Wright: 2002, ‘The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Advancing the SEC’s Ability to obtain Foreign Audit Documentation in Accounting Fraud Investigations’, Columbia Business Law Review, 750–791. Google Scholar
  205. Sullivan, J. J.: 2002, ‘The Future of Corporate Globalization’ (Quorum Books).Google Scholar
  206. Tamm, I. 2004 ‘Dangerous Appetites: Human Rights Activism and Conflict Commodities’Human Rights Quarterly 26687704Google Scholar
  207. Texas Teachers (www.trs.state.tx.us). ‘The Greedy Bunch’, Fortune.com, An exclusive study by Thompson Financial, and the University of Chicago’s Center for Research in Securities Pricing, www.fortune.com.Google Scholar
  208. The International Labor Organization (ILO) Tripartite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy (1977).Google Scholar
  209. The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (1976).Google Scholar
  210. Thurow, L. C.: 1996, ‘The Future of Capitalism: How Today’s Economic Forces Shape Tomorrow’s World’ (William Morrow and Company, Inc.). Google Scholar
  211. Toffler, B. L. and J. Reingold: 2003, ‘Final Accounting: Ambition, Greed and the Fall of Arthur Anderson’, (Broadway Publisher). Google Scholar
  212. U.S. Proxy Voting Policy Statement & Guidelines (Vermont State Employees’ Retirement System, Feb. 2004; Vermont State Teachers’ Retirement System, Feb. 2004).Google Scholar
  213. Ueng, C. J., D. W. Wells and J. D. Lilly: ‘CEO Influence and Executive Compensation: Large Firms vs. Small Firms’ (University of St. Thomas, The Cameron School of Business), www. stthorn.edu.Google Scholar
  214. UNOCAL http://www.unocal.com.Google Scholar
  215. Van Marrewijk, M.: ‘Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion’, Journal of Business Ethics 44(2 and 3), 95–105.Google Scholar
  216. Vandenberg, A.: 2000, ‘Citizenship and Democracy in a Global Era’ (St. Martin’s Press).Google Scholar
  217. Walden Social Equity http://www.waldenassetmgmt.com.Google Scholar
  218. ‘Wall Street firms settle charges over research in $1.4bn pact’, eFinancialNews (Apr. 29, 2003).Google Scholar
  219. Wayne, L. and A. Pollack: 1998, ‘The Master of Orange County: A Merrill Lynch Broker Survives Municipal Bankruptcy’, The New York Times (July).Google Scholar
  220. Weinberg, N.: 2004, ‘Sanctimonious in Sacramento’, Forbes Magazine, www.forbes.com, May. Google Scholar
  221. Wheeler, D., Grayson, D. 2001‘Business and Its Stakeholders’Journal of Business Ethics32101106Google Scholar
  222. Wighton, D.: 2004 ‘JP Morgan sets aside extra Dollars 3.7bn for investor lawsuits’. Financial Times, London Edition, July 22.Google Scholar
  223. Williamson, O. E.: 1985, ‘The Economic Institutions of Capitalism’ (The Free Press).Google Scholar
  224. Wolf, C. Jr.: 1978, ‘A Theory of Non-Market Failures: Framework for Implementation Analysis’, The Journal of Law and Economics, 107–139. Google Scholar
  225. Wolf, M. 2001‘Will the Nation-State Survive Globalization?’Foreign Affairs80178190www.CSRwire.com.Google Scholar
  226. Zhen, L. 2003‘The Role of Firm Size in Executive Compensation’Stony BrookState University of New Yorkhttp://www.ic.sunysb.edu (January & November)Google Scholar
  227. Zimmerman S.: 2003, ‘Sizing Up Socially Responsible Funds’, MorningStar.com, www.morningstar.com (August). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1. Zicklin School of Business, Baruch CollegeThe City University of New YorkNew YorkU. S. A.

Personalised recommendations