Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 255–274 | Cite as

Democracy, Cooperation and Business Success: The Case of Mondragón Corporación Cooperativa

  • Francisco Javier Forcadell
Article

Abstract

Are democracy and success compatible in a business organization? In this work we show how Spain’s Mondragón Corporación Cooperativa (MCC) has made it possible. MCC can be considered a world leader in cooperativism. It is one of the few contemporary business organizations that can be viewed as a democracy, and it represents a unique experience in the use of democratic and participatory methods in management. MCC has developed its own Management Model based on its cooperative principles, on modern management practices and on the cutting edge experiences of the most advanced companies. In this work we analyze the key elements of MCC’s democratic management model, developed around aspects such as corporate culture, organizational structure or human resources. We also look at the case of Irizar, a component cooperative of MCC internationally known for its successful management model. Finally, we outline some practical implications of introducing democracy into organizations, drawn from the experiences of MCC and Irizar.

Keywords

co-operation corporate culture democracy human resources organizational structure participation strategy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barlett, C. A. and S. Ghoshal: 1995, ‘Changing the Role of Top Management: Beyond Systems to People’, Harvard Business Review May–June, 132–142.Google Scholar
  2. Benello, G. 1996‘The Challenge of Mondragón’Ehrlich, H. eds. Reinventing Anarchy AgainAK PressEdinburg211220Google Scholar
  3. Casadesus-Masanell, R. and T. Khanna: 2002, ‘Mondragón Corporación Cooperativa (MCC)’, Harvard Business School Case Study N9-702-457, February 18.Google Scholar
  4. Cheney, G 1995‘Democracy in the Workplace: Theory and Practice from the Perspective of Communication’Journal of Applied Communication Research23167200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cloke, K., Goldsmith, J. 2002The End of Management and the Rise of Organizational DemocracyWileyNYGoogle Scholar
  6. EIU: 2000, ‘The Global Bus and Coach Industry: Fortunes Revive’. EIU Motor Business International 1st Quarter 2000. The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited, 172.Google Scholar
  7. Errasti, A. M., Heras, I., Bakaikoa, B., Elgoibar, P. 2003‘The Internationalisation of Cooperatives: The Case of Mondragón Cooperative Corporation’Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics74553584Google Scholar
  8. European Foundation for Quality Management. http://www.efqm.org.Google Scholar
  9. Forcadell, F. J. 2000‘Success in the Practical Application of Cooperative Principles at Spain’s Mondragón cooperative Corporation’National Productivity Review195971Google Scholar
  10. Forcadell, F. J., Guadamillas, F. 2002‘A Case Study on the Implementation of a Knowledge Management Strategy Oriented to Innovation’Knowledge and Process Management9162171Google Scholar
  11. Handy, C.: 1992, ‘Balancing Corporate Power: A New Federalist Paper’, Harvard Business Review Nov–Dec, 59–72.Google Scholar
  12. Jarley, P., Fiorito, J., Delaney, J. T. 1997‘A Structural Contingency Approach to Bureaucracy and Democracy in U.S. national unions’Academy of Management Journal40831861Google Scholar
  13. Johnston, S. J.: 2002, ‘Location, Location, Location: Strategy in Europe’, HBS Working Knowledge, June 3. http://hbswk.hbs.edu.Google Scholar
  14. Katz, J. P., Boland, M. A. 2002‘One for All and All for One? A New Generation of Co-operatives Emerges’Long Range Planning357389Google Scholar
  15. Labiano, J. 2003‘Participar es la clave’Emprendedores653842Google Scholar
  16. Levering, R., Moskowitz, M. 1993The 100 Best Companies to Work for in AmericaDoubleday-Bantam-DellNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Malone, T. W. 2004The Future of WorkHarvard Business School PressBoston, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Manville, B., Ober, J. 2003A Company of CitizensHarvard Business School PressBoston, MAGoogle Scholar
  19. MCC: 1999, ‘Nuevos espacios corporativos’, document, 30 June 1999.Google Scholar
  20. MCC. 2001. Historia de una experiencia, Mondragón.Google Scholar
  21. MCC: http://www.mcc.es/esp/quienessomos/modelo.htm.Google Scholar
  22. Meen, D. E., Kenough, M. 1992‘Creating the Learning Organization’The McKinsey Quarterly15878Google Scholar
  23. O’Toole, J. 1995Leading ChangeJossey-BassSan Francisco148Google Scholar
  24. Pearce, C. L. 2004‘The Future of Leadership: Combining Vertical and Shared Leadership to Transform Knowledge Work’Academy of Management Executive184757Google Scholar
  25. Rousseau, D. M., Shperling, Z. 2003‘Pieces of the Action: Ownership and the Changing Employment Relationship’Academy of Management Review28553570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Semler, R.: 1989, ‘Managing Without Managers’, Harvard Business Review September–October, 76–84.Google Scholar
  27. Semler, R. 1993MaverickRandom HouseLondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Slater, P. and W. Bennis: 1964, ‘Democracy is Inevitable’, Harvard Business Review Mar–Apr, 51–59.Google Scholar
  29. Smits, H. N. J., Groeneveld, J. M. 2001‘Reflections on Strategic Renewal at Rabobank’Long Range Planning34249258Google Scholar
  30. Whyte, W. F. and K. K. Whyte: 1991, Making Mondragón: The Growth and Dynamics of the Worker Co-operative Complex, 2nd Edition (ILR-Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Management DepartmentUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations