Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 323–337 | Cite as

Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Dirk Matten
  • Jeremy Moon
Article

Abstract

In the context of some criticism about social responsibility education in business schools, the paper reports findings from a survey of CSR education (teaching and research) in Europe. It analyses the extent of CSR education, the different ways in which it is defined and the levels at which it is taught. The paper provides an account of the efforts that are being made to ‘‘mainstream’’ CSR teaching and of the teaching methods deployed. It considers drivers of CSR courses, particularly the historical role of motivated individuals and the anticipation of future success being dependent on more institutional drivers. Finally it considers main developments in CSR research both by business school faculty and PhD students, tomorrow’s researchers and the resources devoted to CSR research. The conclusion includes questions that arise and further research directions.

Keywords

corporate social responsibility Europe mainstreaming survey of business schools teaching and research 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, P. S. 2002‘Corporate Scandals: It’s Time for Reflection in Business Schools’Academy of Management Executive16148149Google Scholar
  2. Aspen/WRI. 2003, Beyond Grey Pinstripes 2003. Preparing MBAs for Social and Environmental Stewardship [accessed on 5 March 2004], The Aspen Institute and the World Resource Institute, www.BeyondGreyPinstripes.orgGoogle Scholar
  3. Carroll, A. B. 1999‘Corporate social responsibility – Evolution of a Definitional Construct’Business and Society38(3)268295Google Scholar
  4. Caulkin, S. 2004‘Business Schools for Scandal’, The ObserverMarch 28 )9 (Business SectionGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins, D., Wartick, S. L. 1995‘Business and Society/Business Ethics Courses’Business and Society34(1)5189Google Scholar
  6. Cowton, C. J., Cummins, J. 2003‘Teaching Business Ethics in UK Higher Education: Progress and Prospects’Teaching Business Ethics73754Google Scholar
  7. Crane, A., Matten, D. 2004Business Ethics - A European Perspective. Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of GlobalizationOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Cummins, J. 1999The Teaching of Business Ethics at Undergraduate, Postgraduate and Professional Levels in the UKInstitute of Business EthicsLondonGoogle Scholar
  9. EBNSC/Copenhagen Centre, 1998, ‘‘Business in Society’’ in European Universities and Business Schools, European Business Network for Social Cohesion, The Copenhagen Centre, Brussels, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  10. Enderle, G. 1990‘A Worldwide Survey of Business Ethics in the 1990s’Journal of Business Ethics1614751483Google Scholar
  11. Fernandez Young, A., Moon, J., Young, R. 2003The UK Corporate Social Responsibility Consultancy Industry: A Phenomenological ApproachResearch Paper Series ICCSR No 14-2003NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  12. Gioia, D. A. 2002‘Business Education’s Role in the Crisis of Confidence in Corporations’Academy of Management Executive16(3)142144Google Scholar
  13. Goshal, S. 2003‘Business schools share the blame for Enron’Financial Times(July 18)Google Scholar
  14. Hosmer, L. T. 1985‘The other 338: Why a Majority of Our Schools of Business Administration do Not Offer a Course in Business Ethics’Journal of Business Ethics41722Google Scholar
  15. Hosmer, L. T. 1999‘Somebody Out There Doesn’t Like us: A Study of the Position and Respect of Business Ethics at Schools of Business Administration’Journal of Business Ethics2291106Google Scholar
  16. Mahoney, J. 1990Teaching Business Ethics in the UK, Europe, and the USA : A Comparative StudyAthlone PressLondon; Atlantic Highlands, NJGoogle Scholar
  17. Moon, J., Matten, D. 2004Corporate Social Responsibility Education – How and why Europe is different (Research Paper Series ICCSRNottingham)forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  18. Morris, D. 2001‘Business Ethics Assessment Criteria: Business v. Philosophy – Survey Results’Business Ethics Quarterly11(4)623650Google Scholar
  19. Shannon, J. R., Berl, R. L. 1997‘Are we teaching ethics in marketing? A survey of students’ attitudes and perceptions’Journal of Business Ethics1610591075Google Scholar
  20. Stewart, C. S.: 2004, ‘A question of Ethics: How to Teach Them?’ The New York Times (March 21).Google Scholar
  21. van Luijk, H.J. L. 2001‘Business ethics in Europe: A Tale of Two Efforts’, in RFrederick (ed.)A Companion to Business Ethics (Blackwell, Cambrigde/MA, Oxford), pp. 643–658Google Scholar
  22. Wheeler, D., Horvath, D., Victor, P. 2001‘Graduate Learning for Business and Sustainability’Journal of Business Administration and Policy Analysis 27–29167 – 187Google Scholar
  23. Willen, L.: 2004, ‘Kellogg Denies Guilt as B Schools Evade Alumni Lapses’, www.bloomberg.com [accessed on 8 March 2004].Google Scholar
  24. Wolf, M. 2002‘‘Response to Confronting the Critics’‘New Academy Review1(1)230237Google Scholar
  25. Zsolnai, L. 1998The European difference. Business Ethics in the Community of European Business SchoolsKluwerBoston, Dordrecht, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Centre for Corporate Social ResponsibilityNottingham University Business SchoolNottinghamU.K.

Personalised recommendations