Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 273–301 | Cite as

Individual Differences in the Acceptability of Unethical Information Technology Practices: The Case of Machiavellianism and Ethical Ideology

  • Susan J. WinterEmail author
  • Antonis C. Stylianou
  • Robert A. Giacalone
Article

Abstract

While information technologies present organizations with opportunities to become more competitive, unsettled social norms and lagging legislation guiding the use of these technologies present organizations and individuals with ethical dilemmas. This paper presents two studies investigating the relationship between intellectual property and privacy attitudes, Machiavellianism and Ethical Ideology, and working in R&D and computer literacy in the form of programming experience. In Study 1, Machiavellians believed it was more acceptable to ignore the intellectual property and privacy rights of others. Programmers and R&D workers considered violating intellectual property rights more acceptable. Programmers did not consider violating privacy rights more acceptable, but R&D workers did. Finally, there was an interaction between Machiavellianism, programming and R&D. Machiavellians who also had programming experience or worked in R&D found violations of intellectual property much more acceptable. The effect of Machiavellianism on attitudes toward violations of privacy was enhanced by working in R&D, but not by programming experience. In Study 2, idealists believed it was less acceptable to ignore the intellectual property and privacy rights of others. Relativists found it more acceptable to violate intellectual property rights, though they did not consider it more acceptable to violate privacy rights. Those with programming experience were more accepting of intellectual property rights violations, but not of privacy violations. Finally, programming experience moderated the relationship between idealism, relativism and attitudes toward these unethical information practices. Implications for diminishing unethical behavior among Machiavellians, Relativists, programmers and those in R&D are discussed.

Keywords

ethics intellectual property privacy computers information technology Machiavellianism Ethics Position Questionnaire videalism relativism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G. 1991Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting InteractionsSage PublicationsNewbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. 2001‘Nature and Operation of Attitudes’Annual Review of Psychology522758Google Scholar
  3. Badawy, M. K. 1973‘Bureaucracy in Research: A Study of Role Conflict of Scientists’Human Organization32123133Google Scholar
  4. Badawy, M. K. 1988‘Managing Human Resources: What We’ve Learned’Research-Technology Management311935Google Scholar
  5. Banerjee, D., Cronan, T. P., Jones, T. W. 1998‘Modeling IT Ethics: A Study in Situational Ethics’MIS Quarterly223160Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, T., Bass, K., Brown, G. 1994‘Ethical Ideology and Ethical Judgment Regarding Ethical Issues in Business’Journal of Business Ethics13469480Google Scholar
  7. Barnett, T., Bass, K., Brown, G. 1996‘Religiosity, Ethical Ideology, and Intentions to Report a Peer’s Wrongdoing’Journal of Business Ethics1511611174Google Scholar
  8. Barnett, T., Bass, K., Brown, G., Hebert , F.J. 1998‘Ethical Ideology and the Ethical Judgments of Marketing Professionals’Journal of Business Ethics17715723Google Scholar
  9. Bass, K., Barnett, T., Brown, G. 1999‘Individual Difference Variables, Ethical Judgments, and Ethical Behavioral Intentions’Business Ethics Quarterly9183205Google Scholar
  10. Bouty, I. 2000‘Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges between R&D Researchers across Organizational Boundaries’Academy of Management Journal435065Google Scholar
  11. Burrill, G. S. 1986‘Managing the Technical Professional: A Question of Balance’Management Review754649Google Scholar
  12. Calhoon, R. P. 1969‘Niccolo Machiavelli and the Twentieth Century Administrator’Academy of Management Journal12205212Google Scholar
  13. Calkins, M. 2002‘Rippers, Portal Users and Profilers: Three Web-based Issues for Business Ethicists’Business and Society Review1076175Google Scholar
  14. Christie, R., Geis, F. 1970Studies in MachiavellianismAcademic PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, L. A., Watson, D. 1995‘Constructing Validity: Basic Issues in Objective Scale Development’Psychological Assessment7309319Google Scholar
  16. Culnan, M. 2000‘Protecting Privacy Online: Is Self-regulation Working?’Journal of Public Policy and Marketing192026Google Scholar
  17. Debackere, K., Rappa, M. A., Clarysse, B. 1996‘Autonomy and Persistence in Industrial Laboratory Research: The Dilemma Revisited’Journal of High-Tech Management Research76978Google Scholar
  18. Denning, D. E.: 1990, ‘Hackers Who Break into Computer Systems’, Proceedings of the 13th National Computer Security Conference (Washington, DC). Also available at http://www.cpsr.org/cpsr/privacy/crime/denning.hackers.html. Google Scholar
  19. Fletcher, C. 1990‘The Relationship between Candidate Personality, Self-Presentation Strategies, and Interviewer Assessments in Selection Interviews: An Empirical Study’Human Relations43739749Google Scholar
  20. Flynn, S., Reichard, M., Slane, S. 1987‘Cheating as a Function of Task Outcome and Machiavellianism’Journal of Psychology121423427Google Scholar
  21. Forsyth, D. R. 1980‘A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39175184Google Scholar
  22. Forsyth, D. R. 1981‘Moral Judgment: The Influence of Ethical Ideology’Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin7218223Google Scholar
  23. Forsyth, D. R. 1985‘Individual Differences in Information Integration During Moral Judgment’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology49264272Google Scholar
  24. Forsyth, D. R. 1992‘Judging the Morality of Business Practices: The Influence of Personal Moral Philosophies’Journal of Business Ethics11461470Google Scholar
  25. Forsyth, D. R., Pope, W. R. 1984‘Ethical Ideology and Judgments of Social Psychological Research: A Multidimensional Analysis’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology4613651375Google Scholar
  26. Forsyth, D. R., Nye, J. L. 1990‘Personal Moral Philosophies and Moral Choice’Journal of Research in Personality24398414Google Scholar
  27. Forsyth, D. R., Nye, J. L., Kelley, K. 1988‘Idealism, relativism, and the Ethic of Caring’The Journal of Psychology112243248Google Scholar
  28. Friedman, B. 1997‘Social Judgments and Technological Innovation: Adolescents Understanding of Property, Privacy, and Electronic Information’Computers in Human Behavior13327351Google Scholar
  29. Gaines, H. 1994‘The Disconnect between Scientists and Corporations’Business Horizons3714Google Scholar
  30. Geis, F. and R. Christie: 1970, ‘Overview of Experimental Research’, in R. Christie and F. L. Geis (eds.), Studies in Machiavellianism (Academic Press, New York), pp. 285--313.Google Scholar
  31. Giacalone, R. A., Knouse, S. B. 1990‘Justifying Wrongful Employee Behavior: The Role of Personality in Organizational Sabotage’Journal of Business Ethics95561Google Scholar
  32. Giacalone, R. A., Jurkiewicz, C. A. 2003Handbook of Workplace Spirituality and Organizational PerformanceM.E. SharpeArmonk, NYGoogle Scholar
  33. Gladney, H. M.: 2000, ‘Are Intellectual Property Rights a Digital Dilemma? Controversial Topics and International Aspects’, Information Impacts Magazine.Google Scholar
  34. Greenberger, D. B., Miceli, M. P., Cohen, D. 1987‘Oppositionists and Group Norms: The Reciprocal Influence of Whistle-Blowers and Co-Workers’Journal of Business Ethics7527542Google Scholar
  35. Gutek, B. A., S. J. Winter and I. V. Eriksson: 2000, ‘Measuring Computer Literacy in the Context of Work: Development and Initial Validation’, Transactions in International Information Systems-Systems Analysis and Development Theory and Practice 2, 53--72.Google Scholar
  36. Harrell, W. A., Hartnagel, T. 1976‘The Impact of Machiavellianism and the Trustfulness of the Victim on Laboratory Theft’Sociometry39157165Google Scholar
  37. Hegarty, W. H., Sims, H. P. ,Jr 1978‘Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment’Journal of Applied Psychology63451457Google Scholar
  38. Hegarty, W. H., Sims, H. P.,Jr 1979‘Organization␣Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment’Journal of Applied Psychology64331338Google Scholar
  39. Hinkin, T. R. 1998‘A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires’Organizational Research Methods1104121Google Scholar
  40. Ho, F. N., Vitell, S. J., Barnes, J. H., Desborde, R. 1997‘Ethical Correlates of Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Marketing: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Moral Development’Academy of Marketing Science Journal25117126Google Scholar
  41. Kreie, J., Cronan, T. P. 1999‘Copyright, Piracy, Privacy, and Security Issues: Acceptable or Unacceptable Actions For End Users?’Journal of End User Computing1113Google Scholar
  42. Kreie, J., Cronan, T. P. 2000‘Making Ethical Decisions: How Companies Might Influence the Choices One Makes’Communications of the ACM436671Google Scholar
  43. Loch, K. D., Conger, S. 1996‘Evaluating Ethical Decision Making and Computer Use’Communications of the ACM397483Google Scholar
  44. Loch, K. D., Conger, S., Oz, E. 1998‘Ownership, Privacy and Monitoring in the Workplace: A Debate on Technology and Ethics’Journal of Business Ethics17653663Google Scholar
  45. Machiavelli, N.: 1965a, The Prince, translated by A. Gilbert (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).Google Scholar
  46. Machiavelli, N.: 1965b, Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livius, translated by A. Gilbert (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).Google Scholar
  47. Mason, R. O. 1986‘Four Ethical Issues of the Information Age’MIS Quarterly10412Google Scholar
  48. Mellican, E. R. 1992‘From Fusion Frenzy to Fraud: Reflections on Science and its Cultural Norms’Bulletin of Science Technology and Society1219Google Scholar
  49. Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., Schwenk, C. R. 1991‘Who Blows the Whistle and Why?’Industrial and Labor Relations Review45113130Google Scholar
  50. Miller, D. B. 1986‘Understanding the R&D Culture’Management Review753439Google Scholar
  51. Mudrack, P. E. 1993‘An Investigation into the Acceptability of Workplace Behaviors of a Dubious Ethical Nature’Journal of Business Ethics12517524Google Scholar
  52. Oz, E. 1994Ethics for the Information AgeWm. C. Brown CommunicationsDubuque, IAGoogle Scholar
  53. Oz, E. 2001‘Organizational Commitment and Ethical Behavior: An Empirical Study of Information System Professionals’Journal of Business Ethics34137142Google Scholar
  54. Paradice, D. B. 1990‘Ethical Attitudes of Entry-Level MIS Personnel’Information and Management18143151Google Scholar
  55. Rappa, M. A., Debackere, K. 1992‘Technological Communities and the Diffusion of Knowledge’R&D Management22209220Google Scholar
  56. Robinson, J. P., Shaver, R. 1973Measurement of Social Psychological AttitudesInstitute for Social ResearchAnn Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  57. Rosenberg, R. D. 1987‘Managerial Morality and Behavior: The Questionable Payments Issue’Journal of Business Ethics62336Google Scholar
  58. Ross, A.: 1990, ‘Hacking Away at the Counterculture’, Postmodern Culture 1(1).Google Scholar
  59. Shahin, J. B.: 1999, ‘Regulation, Governance and the Internet: The Quest for a Global Ethic?’, Proceedings of the Fourth ETHICOMP International Conference on the Social and Ethical Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies (Rome, Italy).Google Scholar
  60. Shaw, T. R. 2003‘The Moral Intensity of Privacy: An Empirical Study of Webmasters Attitudes’Journal of Business Ethics46301318Google Scholar
  61. Sheehan, K. B., Hoy, M. G. 1999‘Flaming, Complaining, Abstaining: How Online Users Respond to Privacy Concerns’Journal of Advertising283751Google Scholar
  62. Singhapakdi, A. 1999a‘Perceived Importance of Ethics and Ethical Decisions in Marketing’Journal of Business Research458999Google Scholar
  63. Singhapakdi, A. 1999b‘Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Effects of Perceived Moral Intensity and Personal Moral Philosophies’Academy of Marketing Science Journal271936Google Scholar
  64. Singhapakdi, A., Kraft, K. L., Vitell, S. J., Rallapalli, K. C. 1995a‘The Perceived Importance of Ethics and Social Responsibility on Organizational Effectiveness: A Survey of Marketers’Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science234956Google Scholar
  65. Singhapakdi, A., Rallapalli, K. C., Rao, C. P., Vitell, S. J. 1995b‘Personal and Professional Values Underlying Ethical Decisions: A Comparison of American and Thai Marketers’International Marketing Review126576Google Scholar
  66. Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M. 1995‘Methodological Considerations in the Refinement of Clinical Assessment Instruments’Psychological Assessment7300308Google Scholar
  67. Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., Burke, S. J. 1996‘Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals Concerns about Organizational Practices’MIS Quarterly20167196Google Scholar
  68. Snyder, C. R., Lopez, S. J. 2001Handbook of Positive PsychologyOxfordNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Stead, W. E., Worrell, D. L., Stead, J. G. 1990‘An Integrative Model for Understanding and Managing Ethical Behavior in Business Organizations’Journal of Business Ethics9233242Google Scholar
  70. Tansey, R., Brown, G., Hyman, M. R., Dawson, L. E. ,Jr 1994‘Personal Moral Philosophies and the Moral Judgments of Salespeople’Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management145975Google Scholar
  71. Tavani, H. T. 2002‘The Uniqueness Debate in Computer Ethics: What Exactly is at Issue, and Why Does it Matter?’Ethics and Information Technology43754Google Scholar
  72. Templin, L.: 1999, ‘Philosophical Changes in 1990’s Information Technology’, Also available at http://www. leonine.com/\simlion/pub_papers/itphil/paper. html.Google Scholar
  73. Trevino, L. K. 1986‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’Academy of Management Review11601617Google Scholar
  74. Vaicys, C. L. 1996‘The Moderating Effect of Work Climate on Individual Ethical Decision-Making’Unpublished doctoral dissertationLouisiana Tech University, LAGoogle Scholar
  75. Verbicke, W., Ouwerkerk, C., Peelen, E. 1996‘Exploring the Contextual and Individual Factors on Ethical Decision Making by Salespeople’Journal of Business Ethics1511751187Google Scholar
  76. Victor, B. and L. B. Cullen: 1988. ‘The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates’, Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 101–125.Google Scholar
  77. Vitell, S., Singhapakdi, A. 1993‘Ethical Ideology and Its Influence on the Norms and Judgments of Marketing Practitioners’Journal of Marketing Management3111Google Scholar
  78. Vitell, S. J., Kumar, R., Singhapakdi, A. 1993‘Marketing Norms: The Influences of Personal Moral Philosophies and Organizational Ethical Culture’Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science21331337Google Scholar
  79. Vitell, S. J., Lumpkin, J. R., Rawwas, M. Y.A. 1991‘Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of Elderly Consumers’Journal of Business Ethics10365375Google Scholar
  80. Walleij, L.: 1998, ‘Copyright Does Not Exist’, Translated␣by Daniel Arnrup. Also available at http://svenskefaen.no/cdne/cdne.pdf.Google Scholar
  81. Wayne, S. J., Rubinstein, D. 1992‘Extending Game Theoretic Propositions About Slack and Scarcity In Managerial Decision-Making’Human Relations45525536Google Scholar
  82. Wilder, C., Soat, J. 2001‘A Question of Ethics’InformationWeek.com193950Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan J. Winter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Antonis C. Stylianou
    • 1
  • Robert A. Giacalone
    • 1
  1. 1.The Belk College of Business AdministrationUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations