BT Technology Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 141–152 | Cite as

Delivering services by building and running virtual organisations

  • D Nguyen
  • S G Thompson
  • J Patel
  • L W T Teacy
  • N R Jennings
  • M Luck
  • V Dang
  • S Chalmers
  • N Oren
  • T J Norman
  • A Preece
  • P M D Gray
  • G Shercliff
  • P J Stockreisser
  • J Shao
  • W A Gray
  • N J Fiddian
Article

Abstract

Customers in the future are likely to obtain their services from coalitions of service providers. These coalitions can be described as virtual organisations (VOs); they are groups of service providers that form relationships to service customers’ demands on an ad-hoc basis. For a VO to be effective, it must be reliable and scalable, and, realistically, it must be created and maintained in a dynamic, open and competitive environment. The CONOISE-G project has focused on resolving the technology challenges that emerged from these requirements. Specifically, CONOISE-G provides mechanisms to assure effective operation of VOs in the face of failure, unexpected events and changing requirements in a dynamic, open and competitive environment. In this paper, we describe the CONOISE-G system, motivated by a scenario based on mobile service provision, outline its use in the context of VO formation and perturbation, and review current efforts to progress the work to deal with unreliable information sources.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Luck M, McBurney P and Preist C: ’A manifesto for agent technology: Towards next generation computing’, Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 9, No 3, pp 203–252 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maximilien E M and Singh M P: ’Toward autonomic Web Services trust and selection’, in ICSOC’04, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on service oriented computing, pp 212–221 (2004).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strang C J: ’Next generation systems architecture — the Matrix’, BT Technol J, 23, No 1, pp 55–68 (January 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Norman T J, Preece A, Chalmers S, Jennings N R, Luck M, Dang V D, Nguyen T D, Deora V, Shao J, Gray A and Fiddian N: ’CONOISE: Agent-based formation of virtual organisations’, Proceedings of the twenty-third Annual International Conference of the British Computer Society’s Specialist Group on Artificial Intelligence (SGAI), Cambridge, UK, pp 353–366 (2003).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caseau Y and Laburthe F: ’Cumulative scheduling with task intervals’, Proceedings of the 1996 Joint International Conference and Syposium on Logic Programming, pp 363–377 (1996).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baptiste P, Le Pape C and Nuijten V: ’Constraint-based scheduling, Applying constraint programming to scheduling problems’, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science 39, Springer (2001).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Petersen S A and Gruninger M: ’An agent-based model to support the formation of virtual enterprises’, in International ICSC Symposium on Mobile Agents and Multi-agents in Virtual Organisations and E-Commerce (2000).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wurman P R, Wellman M P and Walsh W E: ’A parametrization of the auction design space’, Games and Economic Behavior, 35, pp 304–338 (2001) — http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/wurman00para metrization.html MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dang V D and Jennings N R: ’Optimal clearing algorithms for multi-unit single item and multi-unit combinatorial auctions with demand/supply function bidding’, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp 25–30 2003.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gambetta D: ’Can we trust trust?’, in: ‘Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations’, chapter 13, pp 213–237, Basil Blackwell (1988).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sabater J and Sierra C: ’Regret: A reputation model for gregarious societies’, Fourth Workshop on Deception Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, pp 61–70 (2001).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patel J, Teacy W T L, Jennings N R and Luck M: ’Travos: Trust and reputation in the context of inaccurate information sources’, Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (2006), to appear.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Teacy W T L, Patel J, Jennings N R and Luck M: ’Coping with inaccurate reputation sources: Experimental analysis of a probabilistic trust model’, in AAMAS ’05: Proceedings of 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 997–1004 (2005).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bench-Capon T, Freeman J B, Hohmann H and Prakken H: ’Computational models, argumentation theories and legal practice’, in Reed C A and Norman T J (Eds): ‘Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation’, Kluwer, pp 85–120 (2003).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Czajkowski K, Rofrano D A J, Tuecke S and Xu M: ’WS-Agreement: Agreement-based Grid service management’, Global Grid Forum, Seattle (June 2003).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shercliff G, Stockreisser P, Shao J, Gray W and Fiddian N: ’Supporting QoS assessment and monitoring in virtual organisations’, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, pp 249–250 (2005).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deora V, Shao J, Shercliff G, Stockreisser P J, Gray W A and Fiddian N J: ’Incorporating QoS specifications in service discovery’, Proceedings of Second International Web Services Quality Workshop (WQW 2004), pp 252–263 (2004).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tian M, Gramm A, Ritter H and Schiller J: ’Efficient selection and monitoring of QoS-aware Web Services with the WS-QoS framework’, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conf on Web Intelligence (WI’04), pp 152–158 (2004).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grimnes G, Chalmers S, Edwards P and Preece A: ’Granitenights — a multi-agent visit scheduler utilising Semantic Web technology’, 7th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents, pp 137–151 (2003).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Patel J, Teacy W T L, Jennings N R, Luck M, Chalmers S, Oren N, Norman T J, Preece A, Shao J, Gray A, Fiddian N and Thompson S: ’Agent-based virtual organisations for the Grid’, International Journal of Multiagent and Grid Systems, 1, No 4, (2005), to appear.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • D Nguyen
  • S G Thompson
  • J Patel
  • L W T Teacy
  • N R Jennings
  • M Luck
  • V Dang
  • S Chalmers
  • N Oren
  • T J Norman
  • A Preece
  • P M D Gray
  • G Shercliff
  • P J Stockreisser
  • J Shao
  • W A Gray
  • N J Fiddian

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations