Flat epithelial atypia: are we being too aggressive?
- 23 Downloads
The malignant upgrade rate of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) diagnosed on core needle biopsy varies between 0 and 30%. Excision versus observation with radiological follow-up for these lesions remains controversial. We hypothesize that the local rate of FEA is low and that close radiological surveillance is a reasonable treatment option for patients diagnosed with pure FEA on breast needle core needle biopsy.
This study was a retrospective review of a prospectively collated provincial pathology database. Patients diagnosed with FEA alone on needle core biopsy between 2006 and 2016 were included in our analysis. Patients who had FEA present together with either in situ or invasive carcinoma within the same biopsy cores were excluded. Along with patient demographics, the size of the lesion on preoperative imaging, the method of extraction, and the presence of co-existing benign and malignant pathology on final excision biopsy were analyzed. An independent pathological review was performed to confirm our results and help reduce inter-observer bias.
The local rate of malignant upgrade when pure FEA is diagnosed on a breast needle core biopsy is 12%. Age at time of diagnosis, size of original lesion on mammogram, presence of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or atypical lobular hyperplasia on core needle biopsy, the use of vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB), or concordant imaging did not significantly correlate with malignant upgrade risk. None of the patients who were managed with radiological follow-up had malignant upgrade during follow-up. Patients undergoing radiological follow-up alone were more likely to have a VAB, concordant imaging, and no concurrent ADH.
Our local malignant upgrade rate is consistent with published literature. We suggest radiological follow-up is a safe alternative in patients with pure flat epithelial atypia and concordant imaging, particularly those patients with small lesions in which microcalcifications can be removed completely with vacuum-assisted biopsy.
KeywordsBreast neoplasm Flat epithelial atypia Treatment
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by AD, SS, EF, and LP. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AD, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This study was not sponsored.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Our research satisfied all the conditions in TCPS Article 5.5 and Article 12.3. Therefore, a waiver of consent was granted for secondary use of identifiable information or identifiable human biological materials in research.
- 3.Simpson P, Gale T, Reis-Filho J et al (2005) Columnar cell lesions of the breast: the missing link in breast cancer progression? Am J Surg Pathol 29(6):734–746. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000157295.93914.3b CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Martel M, Barron-Rodriguez P, Tolgay-Ocal I, Dotto J, Tavassoli F (2007) Flat DIN 1 (flat epithelial atypia) on core needle biopsy: 63 cases identified retrospectively among 1,751 core biopsies performed over an 8-year period (1992–1999). Virchows Arch 451(5):883–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-007-0499-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Bianchi S, Bendinelli B, Castellano I et al (2012) Morphological parameters of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) in stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle core biopsies do not predict the presence of malignancy on subsequent surgical excision. Virchows Arch 461(4):405–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-012-1279-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Canadian Cancer Society’s Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics (2016) Canadian Cancer Statistics 2016. Canadian Cancer Society, TorontoGoogle Scholar
- 19.David N, Labbe-Devilliers C, Moreau D, Loussouarn D, Campion L (2007) Diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia after stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy of the breast: what is the best management: systematic surgery for all or follow-up? Clin Imaging 31(3):221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2007.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Schiaffino S, Gristina L, Villa A, Tosto S, Monetti F, Carli F, Calabrese M (2018) Flat epithelial atypia: conservative management of patients without residual microcalcifications post-vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Br J Radiol 91(1081):20170484. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170484 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Calhoun BC, Sobel A, White RL, Gromet M, Flippo T, Sarantou T, Livasy CA (2015) Management of flat epithelial atypia on breast core biopsy may be individualized based on correlation with imaging studies. Mod Pathol 28(5):670–676. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2014.159 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar