Advertisement

Efficacy and toxicity of extended aromatase inhibitors after adjuvant aromatase inhibitors-containing therapy for hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: a literature-based meta-analysis of randomized trials

  • Xiaoying Qian
  • Zhian Li
  • GuoDong Ruan
  • Chuanjian Tu
  • Wu DingEmail author
Review
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is the cornerstone of adjuvant systemic treatment for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. It has become clear that hormone receptor-positive breast cancer carries a consistent risk of relapse up to 15 years after diagnosis. Extended duration of adjuvant AIs therapy after completing initial standard adjuvant AIs-containing therapy may prevent late recurrence and death. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the real impact of the extended adjuvant therapy with AIs.

Methods

A literature-based meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was undertaken. Relevant publications from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and abstracts from American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and San Antonio Breast Cancer (SABCS) symposia were searched. The endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), local recurrence, distant recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, non-breast cancer-related death, and toxicity.

Results

Eight trials comprising 15,966 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis revealed a significant improvement in DFS (RR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.68–0.91), distant recurrence (RR = 0.75; 95% CI 0.58–0.96), and contralateral breast cancer (RR = 0.53; 95% CI 0.40–0.70) in the extended AIs group. While there was not significant improvement in OS (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.99–1.01), non-breast cancer-related death (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.96–1.41), and local recurrence (RR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.64–1.06), the subgroup analysis showed that the patient with tumor size > 2 cm (HR = 0.74, RD = − 0.31, P = 0.05 vs. HR = 0.85, RD = − 0.16, P = 0.20), node positive status (HR = 0.77, RD = − 0.27, P = < 0.0001 vs. HR = 0.89, RD = −0.12, P = 0.19) and previous chemotherapy use (HR = 0.75, RD = − 0.29, P = 0.003 vs. HR = 0.91, RD = −0.10, P = 0.44) would get a greater DFS benefit with extended AIs. Longer treatment with AIs was associated with an increased risk ratio of bone pain (RR = 1.26, RD = 0.04, P = 0.003), bone fractures (RR = 1.59, RD = 0.02, P = 0.002), osteoporosis (RR = 1.53, RD = 0.07, P = 0.005), myalgia (RR = 1.26, RD = 0.04, P = 0.02), and treatment discontinuation for adverse events (RR = 1.51, RD = 0.06, P = 0.0009).

Conclusion

After initial standard AIs-containing adjuvant therapy, extended AIs therapy could further bring a DFS benefit for postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer, especially in the patients with high-risk characteristics.

Keywords

Breast cancer Hormone-positive Adjuvant endocrine therapy Aromatase inhibitors Extended adjuvant AIs therapy 

Abbreviations

RCTs

Randomized controlled trials

ASCO

American Society of Clinical Oncology

SABCS

San Antonio Breast Cancer

RR

Risk ratio

HR

Hazard ratio

RD

Risk difference

CI

Confidence intervals

ER

Estrogen receptor

PR

Progesterone receptor

Node positive or negative

DFS

Disease-free survival

OS

Overall survival

LR

Local recurrence

DR

Distant recurrence

CBC

Contralateral breast cancer

NBCD

Non-breast cancer-related death

TAM

Tamoxifen

ANA

Anastozole

LET

Letrozole

AIs

Aromatase inhibitors

OFS

Ovarian function suppression

AG

Aminoglutethimide

COMB

Combination

mo

Month

plac

Placebo

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Luping chen for her support and guidance throughout the project.

Author contributions

W Ding designed the study and developed the analysis plan. W Ding and X.Y. Qian analyzed the data and performed meta-analysis. Z.A. Li and X.Y. Qian assessed the risk of bias. X.Y. Qian contributed in writing of the article. C.J. Tu and G.D. Ruanuan revised the manuscript and polished the language.

Funding

Not applicable.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Ethical approval was not applicable for this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Reference

  1. 1.
    Rossi L, Pagani O (2015) The modern landscape of endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with breast cancer. Breast Care 10(5):312–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    The Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 378:771–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2015) Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Lancet 386:1341–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colleoni M, Sun Z, Price KN et al (2016) Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer during 24 years of follow-up: results from the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials I to V. J Clin Oncol 34(9):927–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goss PE, Ingle JN, Martino S et al (2003) A randomized trial of letrozole in postmenopausal women after five years of tamoxifen therapy for early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 349:1793–1802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mamounas EP, Jeong JH, Wickerham DL et al (2008) Benefit from exemestane as extended adjuvant therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen: intention-to-treat analysis of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast And Bowel Project B-33 trial. J Clin Oncol 26:1965–1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J et al (2013) Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet 381:805–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gray RG, Rea D, Handley K et al (2013) aTTom: long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years in 6,953 women with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 31(Supplement 1):18Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaufmann M, Jonat W, Hilfrich J et al (2007) Improved overall survival in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer after anastrozole initiated after treatment with tamoxifen compared with continued tamoxifen: the ARNO 95 Study. J Clin Oncol 25:2664–2670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goldvaser H, AlGorashi I, Ribnikar D et al (2017) Efficacy of extended adjuvant therapy with aromatase inhibitors in early breast cancer among common clinicopathologically defined subgroups: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 60:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Higgins MJ, Liedke PE, Goss PE (2013) Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone dependent breast cancer: the paradigm of the NCIC-CTG MA.17/BIG 1-97 trial. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 86:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gnant M, Steger G, Greil R et al (2018) A prospective randomized multi-center phase-III trial of additional 2 versus additional 5 years of anastrozole after initial 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy—results from 3,484 postmenopausal women in the ABCSG-16 trial. Cancer Res 78(4 Supplement):1Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jakesz R, Greil R, Gnant M et al (2007) Extended adjuvant therapy with anastrozole among postmenopausal breast cancer patients: results from the randomized Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial 6a. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(24):1845–1853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ohtani S, Lijima K, Higaki K et al (2019) A prospective randomized multi-center open-label phase III trial of extending aromatase-inhibitor adjuvant therapy to 10 years-Results from 1697 postmenopausal women in the N-SAS BC 05 trial: Arimidex extended adjuvant randomized study (AERAS). Cancer Res 79(4 Supplement):1Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van Hellemond IEG, Peer PGM et al (2017) Extended adjuvant aromatase inhibition after sequential endocrine therapy (DATA): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18(11):1502–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Blok EJ, Kroep JR, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E et al (2018) Optimal duration of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for early breast cancer; results of the IDEAL Trial (BOOG 2006-05). J Natl Cancer Inst 110(1):40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zdenkowski N, Forbes JF, Boyle FM et al (2016) Observation versus late reintroduction of letrozole as adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptorpositive breast cancer (ANZ0501 LATER): an open-label randomised, controlled trial. Ann Oncol 27(5):806–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goss PE, Ingle JN, Pritchard KI et al (2016) Extending aromatase-inhibitor adjuvant therapy to 10 years. N Engl J Med 375(3):209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mamounas EP, Bandos H, Lembersky BC et al (2019) Use of letrozole after aromatase inhibitor-based therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer (NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20(1):88–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Burstein HJ, Prestrud AA, Seidenfeld J et al (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline: update on adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:3784–3796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS et al (2013) Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer. Ann Oncol 24:2206–2223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goss PE, Ingle JN, Martino S et al (2005) Randomized trial of letrozole following tamoxifen as extended adjuvant therapy in receptor-positive breast cancer: updated findings from NCIC CTG MA.17. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1262–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cuzick J, Sestak I, Forbes JF et al (1922) Anastrozole for prevention of breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women (IBIS-II): an international, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 383(9922):1041–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goss PE, Ingle JN, Ales-Martinez JE et al (2011) Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 364(25):2381–2391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Howell A, Anderson AS, Clarke RB et al (2014) Risk determination and prevention of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 16(5):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rahman RL, Pruthi S (2012) Chemoprevention of breast cancer: the paradox of evidence versus advocacy inaction. Cancers 4(4):1146–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dubsky P, Brase JC, Jakesz R et al (2013) The EndoPredict score provides prognostic information on late distant metastases in ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 109:2959–2964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sgroi DC, Sestak I, Cuzick J et al (2013) Prediction of late distant recurrence in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: a prospective comparison of the breast-cancer index (BCI) assay, 21-gene recurrence score, and IHC4 in the TransATAC study population. Lancet Oncol 14:1067–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gnant M, Filipits M, Greil R et al (2014) Predicting distant recurrence in receptor-positive breast cancer patients with limited clinicopathological risk: using the PAM50 risk of recurrence score in 1478 postmenopausal patients of the ABCSG-8 trial treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy alone. Ann Oncol 25:339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dowsett M, Sestak I, Lopez-Knowles E et al (2013) Comparison of PAM50 risk of recurrence score with oncotype DX and IHC4 for predicting risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol 31:2783–2790CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Oncological SurgeryShaoxing Second HospitalShaoxingChina
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryShaoxing Keqiao Women & Children’s HospitalShaoxingChina

Personalised recommendations