Advertisement

Sentinel and non-sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with microinvasive breast cancer: a nationwide study

  • Emil Villiam Holm-RasmussenEmail author
  • Maj-Britt Jensen
  • Eva Balslev
  • Niels Kroman
  • Tove Filtenborg Tvedskov
Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the incidence and risk factors of sentinel lymph node (SN) and non-SN metastases in patients with microinvasive breast cancer (MIBC, T1mic). This to identify MIBC patients in whom axillary staging can be safely omitted.

Methods

The Danish Breast Cancer Group database was used to identify a total of 409 women with breast cancer ≤ 1 mm who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between 2002 and 2015. After validation, 233 patients were eligible for the analysis. The incidence rates of SN and non-SN metastases were determined. The associations between clinicopathological variables and a positive SN [pN1, pN1mi, or pN0(i+)] were analyzed using univariate and multivariate designs.

Results

Of 233 patients with MIBC, only 9 (3.9%) had SN macrometastases. An additional 18 (7.7%) and 23 (9.9%) had SN micrometastases and isolated tumor cells (ITCs), respectively. Of patients with SN macrometastases, two (22.2%) had non-SN macrometastases. In the adjusted analysis, a positive SN was associated with younger age (P = 0.0001) and a positive human epidermal growth factor 2 receptor (HER2) status (P = 0.03).

Conclusions

The low incidence of SN macrometastases < 4% suggests omission of axillary staging in MIBC patients without staging at primary surgery, especially in older (≥ 50 years) HER2 patients. Still, the relatively high proportion of patients with non-SN macrometastases indicates that axillary treatment might be considered in SN positive patients, especially in younger HER2+ MIBC patients.

Keywords

Early-stage breast cancer Microinvasive breast cancer Sentinel lymph node Sentinel lymph node biopsy Sentinel lymph node metastases Axillary lymph node metastases Axillary management Axillary surgery 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Danish Cancer Society (Knæk Cancer-midlerne), Denmark (Grant Number R130-A8152-15-S38), and by the Research Fund of Rigshospitalet, (Copenhagen University Hospital), Denmark (Grant Number E-22335-01).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The register-based study was approved by the Data Protection Agency (J. No. RH-2015-262) and the Danish Patient Safety Authority (J. No. 3-3013-1443/1/). Approvals from Ethical Committees are not needed for registry-based research in Denmark.

Informed consent

The Danish Breast Cancer Group administering the Danish Breast Cancer Database is approved by the National Health Data Authorities (J. No. 14/915974.). The Central Denmark Region holds permission to collect, store, and process data in the Danish Breast Cancer Database on all persons diagnosed with cancer in Denmark without obtaining individual consent (J. No. KPU-2001-04-2001-54-0277). In Denmark, informed consent is not required for register-based research that does not involve contact with study participants or biological samples.

References

  1. 1.
    American Joint Committee on Cancer (2018) AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th edn. https://cancerstaging.org/references-tools/deskreferences/Documents/AJCC%20Breast%20Cancer%20Staging%20System.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2018
  2. 2.
    Shatat L, Gloyeske N, Madan R, O’Neil M, Tawfik O, Fan F (2013) Microinvasive breast carcinoma carries an excellent prognosis regardless of the tumor characteristics. Hum Pathol 44(12):2684–2689.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2013.07.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ko BS, Lim WS, Kim HJ, Yu JH, Lee JW, Kwan SB, Lee YM, Son BH, Gong GY, Ahn SH (2012) Risk factor for axillary lymph node metastases in microinvasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19(1):212–216.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1812-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Orzalesi L, Casella D, Criscenti V, Gjondedaj U, Bianchi S, Vezzosi V, Nori J, Cecconi L, Meattini I, Livi L, Bernini M (2016) Microinvasive breast cancer: pathological parameters, cancer subtypes distribution, and correlation with axillary lymph nodes invasion. Results of a large single-institution series. Breast Cancer 23(4):640–648.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-015-0616-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hanna MG, Jaffer S, Bleiweiss IJ, Nayak A (2014) Re-evaluating the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in microinvasive breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol 27(11):1489–1498.  https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2014.54 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bianchi S, Vezzosi V (2008) Microinvasive carcinoma of the breast. Pathol Oncol Res 14(2):105–111.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-008-9054-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network—Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (2018) https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2018
  8. 8.
    Lyons JM III, Stempel M, Van Zee KJ, Cody HS III (2012) Axillary node staging for microinvasive breast cancer: is it justified? Ann Surg Oncol 19(11):3416–3421.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2376-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gartner R, Jensen MB, Kronborg L, Ewertz M, Kehlet H, Kroman N (2010) Self-reported arm-lymphedema and functional impairment after breast cancer treatment—a nationwide study of prevalence and associated factors. Breast 19(6):506–515.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2010.05.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gartner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H (2009) Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA 302(18):1985–1992.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1568 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jensen MB, Laenkholm AV, Offersen BV, Christiansen P, Kroman N, Mouridsen HT, Ejlertsen B (2018) The clinical database and implementation of treatment guidelines by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group in 2007–2016. Acta Oncol 57(1):13–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2017.1404638 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Danish Breast Cancer Group—Anvendelse af sentinel node biopsy (2013) DBCG. http://dbcg.dk/PDF%20Filer/Kap_12_Anvendelse_af_sentinel_node_06.02.13.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2018
  13. 13.
    Gojon H, Fawunmi D, Valachis A (2014) Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with microinvasive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 40(1):5–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.10.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lillemoe TJ, Tsai ML, Swenson KK, Susnik B, Krueger J, Harris K, Rueth N, Grimm E, Leach JW (2018) Clinicopathologic analysis of a large series of microinvasive breast cancers. Breast J.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13001 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matsen CB, Hirsch A, Eaton A, Stempel M, Heerdt A, Van Zee KJ, Cody HS III, Morrow M, Plitas G (2014) Extent of microinvasion in ductal carcinoma in situ is not associated with sentinel lymph node metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 21(10):3330–3335.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3920-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meretoja TJ, Heikkila PS, Salmenkivi K, Leidenius MH (2012) Outcome of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 19(7):2345–2351.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2287-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Katz A, Gage I, Evans S, Shaffer M, Fleury T, Smith FP, Flax R, Drogula C, Petrucci P, Magnant C (2006) Sentinel lymph node positivity of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or microinvasive breast cancer. Am J Surg 191(6):761–766.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pimiento JM, Lee MC, Esposito NN, Kiluk JV, Khakpour N, Carter WB, Han G, Laronga C (2011) Role of axillary staging in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion. J Oncol Pract 7(5):309–313.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2010.000096 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kapoor NS, Shamonki J, Sim MS, Chung CT, Giuliano AE (2013) Impact of multifocality and lymph node metastasis on the prognosis and management of microinvasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 20(8):2576–2581.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2924-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zavagno G, Belardinelli V, Marconato R, Carcoforo P, Franchini Z, Scalco G, Burelli P, Pietrarota P, Mencarelli R, Marconato G, Nitti D (2007) Sentinel lymph node metastasis from mammary ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion. Breast 16(2):146–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2006.08.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME, Meijnen P, van de Velde CJ, Mansel RE, Cataliotti L, Westenberg AH, Klinkenbijl JH, Orzalesi L, Bouma WH, van der Mijle HC, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Veltkamp SC, Slaets L, Duez NJ, de Graaf PW, van Dalen T, Marinelli A, Rijna H, Snoj M, Bundred NJ, Merkus JW, Belkacemi Y, Petignat P, Schinagl DA, Coens C, Messina CG, Bogaerts J, Rutgers EJ (2014) Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 15(12):1303–1310.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70460-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim M, Kim HJ, Chung YR, Kang E, Kim EK, Kim SH, Kim YJ, Kim JH, Kim IA, Park SY (2018) Microinvasive carcinoma versus ductal carcinoma in situ: a comparison of clinicopathological features and clinical outcomes. J Breast Cancer 21(2):197–205.  https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2018.21.2.197 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    DBCG (2017) Kvalitetsindikatorrapport for Brystkræft. DBCG. http://dbcg.dk/PDF%20Filer/aarsrapport_2017_final.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2018
  24. 24.
    Leonard GD, Swain SM (2004) Ductal carcinoma in situ, complexities and challenges. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(12):906–920CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sopik V, Sun P, Narod SA (2018) Impact of microinvasion on breast cancer mortality in women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer Res Treat 167(3):787–795.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4572-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karlsson E, Sandelin K, Appelgren J, Zhou W, Jirstrom K, Bergh J, Warnberg F (2014) Clonal alteration of breast cancer receptors between primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and corresponding local events. Eur J Cancer 50(3):517–524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.10.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fortunato L, Santoni M, Drago S, Gucciardo G, Farina M, Cesarini C, Cabassi A, Tirelli C, Terribile D, Grassi GB, De Fazio S, Vitelli CE, Rome Breast Cancer Study G (2008) Sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with pT1a or “microinvasive” breast cancer. Breast 17(4):395–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2008.03.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Guth AA, Mercado C, Roses DF, Darvishian F, Singh B, Cangiarella JF (2008) Microinvasive breast cancer and the role of sentinel node biopsy: an institutional experience and review of the literature. Breast J 14(4):335–339.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00594.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Breast Surgery, Rigshospitalet/Herlev-Gentofte HospitalCopenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Danish Breast Cancer GroupCopenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Department of Pathology, Herlev HospitalCopenhagen University HospitalHerlevDenmark

Personalised recommendations