MDM2, MDM2-C, and mutant p53 expression influence breast cancer survival in a multiethnic population
The purpose of the study was to examine the association between expression of mutant p53 (mtp53), full-length MDM2 (MDM2), and MDM2 isoform C (MDM2-C) and survival in multiethnic breast cancer patients.
A total of 787 invasive breast tumors included in a clinically annotated multiethnic population-based tissue microarray (TMA) were screened utilizing commercially available antibodies to p53 and MDM2, and a newly developed monoclonal antibody recognizing MDM2-C.
Mutant p53 (mtp53) was more common in younger (< 50 years) breast cancer patients. Among the 787 cases included in the study, mtp53, MDM2, and MDM2-C expression were not significantly associated with risk of overall or breast cancer-specific mortality. However when associations within individual racial/ethnic groups (White, Japanese, and Native Hawaiian) were examined, expression of MDM2-C was found to be associated with lower risk of breast cancer-specific mortality exclusively for White patients HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15–0.69 and mtp53 expression was associated with higher overall mortality in Japanese patients (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.02–2.59). Also, Japanese patients positive for the joint expression of MDM2-C and mtp53 had a greater than twofold risk of overall mortality (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.04–4.48); and White patients with positive MDM2-C and wild-type p53 expression (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08–0.96) were at lower risk of mortality when compared to patients with negative MDM2-C and wild-type p53 expression in their respective racial/ethnic group.
Racial/ethnic differences in expression profiles of mtp53, MDM2, and MDM2-C and associations with breast cancer-specific and overall mortality. MDM2-C may have a positive or negative role in breast tumorigenesis depending on mtp53 expression.
KeywordsBreast cancer MDM2 MDM2-C P53 Multiethnic Survival
The authors would like to acknowledge the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Antibody and Bioresource Core Facility for excellent assistance with the generation of hybridomas, the Hawaii Tumor Registry, Residual Tissue Repository of the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) program, and the University of Hawaii Cancer Center’s Biostatistics Shared Resource and Pathology Shared Resource for their contribution to this project.
This study was funded by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD008149-SGP14-183; MD007599), NCI (R21CA176555-01A1; 3P30CA071789-12S7), Hawaii Community Foundation (16ADVC-78885), and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.
This study has received ethical approval by the University of Hawaii Committee on Human Studies. This study was a retrospective study, with all subjects having been de-identified, and no formal consent was required. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For the generation of the monoclonal antibodies, all applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
- 1.American Cancer Society (2018) Cancer Facts & Figs. 2018Google Scholar
- 3.Gomez SL, Noone AM, Lichtensztajn DY, Scoppa S, Gibson JT, Liu L, Morris C, Kwong S, Fish K, Wilkens LR, Goodman MT, Deapen D, Miller BA (2013) Cancer incidence trends among Asian American populations in the United States, 1990–2008. J Natl Cancer Inst 105(15):1096–1110. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt157 Google Scholar
- 4.Liu L, Noone AM, Gomez SL, Scoppa S, Gibson JT, Lichtensztajn D, Fish K, Wilkens LR, Goodman MT, Morris C, Kwong S, Deapen D, Miller BA (2013) Cancer incidence trends among Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders in the United States, 1990–2008. J Natl Cancer Inst 105(15):1086–1095. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt156 Google Scholar
- 6.Miller B, Chu K, Hankey B, Ries L (2008) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns among specific Asian and Pacific Islander populations in the U.S. Cancer Causes Control 19(3):227–256Google Scholar
- 12.Kussie PH, Gorina S, Marechal V, Elenbaas B, Moreau J, Levine AJ, Pavletich NP (1996) Structure of the MDM2 oncoprotein bound to the p53 tumor suppressor transactivation domain. Science 274(5289):948–953Google Scholar
- 13.Momand J, Zambetti GP, Olson DC, George D, Levine AJ (1992) The mdm-2 oncogene product forms a complex with the p53 protein and inhibits p53-mediated transactivation. Cell 69(7):1237–1245Google Scholar
- 15.Bartel F, Taubert H, Harris LC (2002) Alternative and aberrant splicing of MDM2 mRNA in human cancer. Cancer Cell 2(1):9–15Google Scholar
- 16.Bartel F, Taylor AC, Taubert H, Harris LC (2001) Novel mdm2 splice variants identified in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma tumors and cell lines. Oncol Res 12(11–12):451–457Google Scholar
- 17.Lukas J, Gao DQ, Keshmeshian M, Wen WH, Tsao-Wei D, Rosenberg S, Press MF (2001) Alternative and aberrant messenger RNA splicing of the mdm2 oncogene in invasive breast cancer. Cancer Res 61(7):3212–3219Google Scholar
- 18.Matsumoto R, Tada M, Nozaki M, Zhang CL, Sawamura Y, Abe H (1998) Short alternative splice transcripts of the mdm2 oncogene correlate to malignancy in human astrocytic neoplasms. Cancer Res 58(4):609–613Google Scholar
- 19.Sigalas I, Calvert AH, Anderson JJ, Neal DE, Lunec J (1996) Alternatively spliced mdm2 transcripts with loss of p53 binding domain sequences: transforming ability and frequent detection in human cancer. Nat Med 2(8):912–917Google Scholar
- 21.Fridman JS, Hernando E, Hemann MT, de Stanchina E, Cordon-Cardo C, Lowe SW (2003) Tumor promotion by Mdm2 splice variants unable to bind p53. Cancer Res 63(18):5703–5706Google Scholar
- 23.Comiskey DF Jr, Jacob AG, Sanford BL, Montes M, Goodwin AK, Steiner H, Matsa E, Tapia-Santos AS, Bebee TW, Grieves J, La Perle K, Boyaka P, Chandler DS (2018) A novel mouse model of rhabdomyosarcoma underscores the dichotomy of MDM2-ALT1 function in vivo. Oncogene 37(1):95–106. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2017.282 Google Scholar
- 26.Dang J, Kuo ML, Eischen CM, Stepanova L, Sherr CJ, Roussel MF (2002) The RING domain of Mdm2 can inhibit cell proliferation. Cancer Res 62(4):1222–1230Google Scholar
- 29.Davidoff AM, Herndon JE II, Glover NS, Kerns BJ, Pence JC, Iglehart JD, Marks JR (1991) Relation between p53 overexpression and established prognostic factors in breast cancer. Surgery 110(2):259–264Google Scholar
- 30.Davidoff AM, Kerns BJ, Iglehart JD, Marks JR (1991) Maintenance of p53 alterations throughout breast cancer progression. Can Res 51(10):2605–2610Google Scholar
- 31.Thor AD, Moore DH, Edgerton II, Kawasaki SM, Reihsaus ES, Lynch E, Marcus HT, Schwartz JN, Chen L, Mayall LC BH, et al (1992) Accumulation of p53 tumor suppressor gene protein: an independent marker of prognosis in breast cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 84(11):845–855Google Scholar
- 32.Anderson WF, Luo S, Chatterjee N, Rosenberg PS, Matsuno RK, Goodman MT, Hernandez BY, Reichman M, Dolled-Filhart MP, O’Regan RM, Garcia-Closas M, Perou CM, Jatoi I, Cartun RW, Sherman ME (2008) Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 and estrogen receptor expression, a demonstration project using the residual tissue repository of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Breast Cancer Res Treat 113(1):189–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9918-3 Google Scholar
- 33.Grambsch PM, Therneau TM (1994) Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 81(3):515–526Google Scholar
- 36.Choschzick M, Heilenkotter U, Lebeau A, Jaenicke F, Terracciano L, Bokemeyer C, Sauter G, Simon R (2010) MDM2 amplification is an independent prognostic feature of node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer. Cancer Biomark 8(2):53–60. https://doi.org/10.3233/DMA-2011-0806 Google Scholar
- 37.Hori M, Shimazaki J, Inagawa S, Itabashi M, Hori M (2002) Overexpression of MDM2 oncoprotein correlates with possession of estrogen receptor alpha and lack of MDM2 mRNA splice variants in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 71(1):77–83Google Scholar
- 41.Bond GL, Hirshfield KM, Kirchhoff T, Alexe G, Bond EE, Robins H, Bartel F, Taubert H, Wuerl P, Hait W, Toppmeyer D, Offit K, Levine AJ (2006) MDM2 SNP309 accelerates tumor formation in a gender-specific and hormone-dependent manner. Cancer Res 66(10):5104–5110. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0180 Google Scholar
- 42.Bond GL, Hu W, Bond EE, Robins H, Lutzker SG, Arva NC, Bargonetti J, Bartel F, Taubert H, Wuerl P, Onel K, Yip L, Hwang SJ, Strong LC, Lozano G, Levine AJ (2004) A single nucleotide polymorphism in the MDM2 promoter attenuates the p53 tumor suppressor pathway and accelerates tumor formation in humans. Cell 119(5):591–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.022 Google Scholar
- 45.Faur N, Araud L, Laroche-Clary A, Kanno J, Toutain J, Yamori T, Robert J, Le Morvan V (2009) The association between the T309G polymorphism of the MDM2 gene and sensitivity to anticancer drug is dependent on the p53 mutational status in cellular models. Br J Cancer 101(2):350–356. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605096 Google Scholar
- 46.van den Broek AJ, Broeks A, Horlings HM, Canisius SV, Braaf LM, Langerod A, Van’t Veer LJ, Schmidt MK (2011) Association of the germline TP53 R72P and MDM2 SNP309 variants with breast cancer survival in specific breast tumor subgroups. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130(2):599–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1615-y Google Scholar
- 47.Harris LC (2005) MDM2 splice variants and their therapeutic implications. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 5(1):21–26Google Scholar
- 48.Shaikh MF, Morano WF, Lee J, Gleeson E, Babcock BD, Michl J, Sarafraz-Yazdi E, Pincus MR, Bowne WB (2016) Emerging role of MDM2 as target for anti-cancer therapy: a review. Ann Clin Lab Sci 46(6):627–634Google Scholar