Anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy versus docetaxel and cyclophosphamide in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Standard adjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-negative breast cancer consists generally in an anthracycline and taxane-based regimen (A+T). The TC (docetaxel and cyclophosphamide) regimen arises as a potential alternative, although individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could not demonstrate the non-inferiority of TC over A+T. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing 6 cycles of TC versus sequential A+T in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer.
A systematic literature search was performed to identify RCTs comparing TC versus A+T. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Subgroup analyses of DFS according to hormone receptor status, lymph node involvement, and menopausal status were performed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for DFS and OS were extracted from each trial, and a pooled analysis was conducted using the random-effect model. The Higgins’ I-Squared Test was used to quantify heterogeneity.
Seven RCTs were included (12,741 patients). Overall, no difference was observed between TC and A+T in DFS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.96–1.20) and OS (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.90–1.22). A trend favoring A+T was observed in hormone receptor-negative (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.93–1.34) and N2 patients (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.82–1.90). Emesis/vomiting, mucositis, thrombocytopenia and sensory neuropathy were significantly more frequent with A+T.
As adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer, sequential A+T regimen was associated with increased risk of toxicities and no clear survival benefit as compared to 6 cycles of TC. Higher-risk patients may benefit the most from A+T, whilst TC may be an efficacious and less toxic alternative for lower-risk patients.
KeywordsBreast cancer Adjuvant chemotherapy Anthracyclines Taxanes
Matteo Lambertini acknowledges the support from the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) for a Translational Research Fellowship at the Institut Jules Bordet (Brussels, Belgium).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Evandro de Azambuja received honoraria from Roche-Genentech, research grant from Roche–Genentech (to the insitution) and travel grants from Roche-Genentech and GlaxoSmithKline outside the submitted work. Matteo Lambertini served as a consultant for Teva and received honoraria from Theramex outside the submitted work All the other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 4.Swain SM, Tang G, Geyer CE et al (2013) Definitive results of a phase III adjuvant trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in women with operable, node-positive breast cancer: the NSABP B-38 trial. J Clin Oncol 31:3197–3204. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.48.1275 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Jones S, Holmes FA, O’Shaughnessy J et al (2009) Docetaxel with cyclophosphamide is associated with an overall survival benefit compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: 7-year follow-up of US Oncology Research Trial 9735. J Clin Oncol 27:1177–1183. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.4028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Mavroudis D, Matikas A, Malamos N et al (2016) Dose-dense FEC followed by docetaxel versus docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy in women with HER2-negative, axillary lymph node-positive early breast cancer: a multicenter randomized study by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG). Ann Oncol 27:1873–1878. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw274 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ejlertsen B, Tuxen MK, Jakobsen EH et al (2017) Adjuvant cyclophosphamide and docetaxel with or without epirubicin for early TOP2A -normal breast cancer: DBCG 07-READ, an open-label, phase III, randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 35:2639–2646. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.72.3494 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Wolfgang et al (2018) Pooled analysis of two randomized phase III trials (PlanB/SuccessC) comparing six cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide to sequential anthracycline taxane chemotherapy in patients with intermediate and high risk HER2-negative early breast cancer (n = 5,923). J Clin Oncol 36:522–522. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Knoop AS, Knudsen H, Balslev E et al (2005) Retrospective analysis of topoisomerase IIa amplifications and deletions as predictive markers in primary breast cancer patients randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 23:7483–7490. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.11.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Leo AD, Desmedt C, Bartlett JMS et al (2011) HER2 and TOP2A as predictive markers for anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 12:1134–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70231-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Colleoni M, Sun Z, Price KN et al (2016) Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer during 24 years of follow-up: results from the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials I to V. J Clin Oncol 34:927–935. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3504 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 19.Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2012) Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100 000 women in 123 randomised trials. The Lancet 379:432–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61625-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Lambertini M, Moore HCF, Leonard RCF et al (2018) Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy for preservation of ovarian function and fertility in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient–level data. J Clin Oncol 36:1981–1990. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.0858 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Metzger-Filho O, Sun Z, Viale G et al (2013) Patterns of recurrence and outcome according to breast cancer subtypes in lymph node–negative disease: results from International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials VIII and IX. J Clin Oncol 31:3083–3090. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.46.1574 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 32.Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA et al (2011) 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 47:8–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2010.10.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar