Meta-analysis of upgrade rates in 3163 radial scars excised after needle core biopsy diagnosis
- 116 Downloads
Since concurrent malignancy may be associated with radial scars (RS) in up to 45% of RS diagnosed on core biopsy, surgical excision is usually advised. Recent very low upgrade rates have caused a re-evaluation of the need for routine surgery. We aimed to find subsets of RS at such low risk of upgrade, as to render imaging surveillance a plausible alternative to surgery.
We performed a systematic review of the Pubmed, Cochrane and Embase databases, focusing on the following eligibility criteria: full papers, published after 1998, in English, included at least 5 RS, provided information on needle biopsy gauge and upgrade rates based on the excised lesion. For the meta-analysis, studies were grouped by the presence of histologic atypia and the core needle gauge. Study-specific and pooled upgrade rates were calculated for each subgroup.
49 studies that included 3163 RS with surgical outcomes are included. There were 217 upgrades to malignancies, 71 (32.7%) invasive and 144 (66.4%) DCIS. The random-effects pooled estimate was 7% (95% CI 5, 9%). Among the pre-planned subgroups, in RS assessed by 14G NCB the upgrade rates were: without atypia − 5% (95% CI 3, 8%), mixed or presence of atypia not specified − 15% (95% CI 10, 20%), with atypia − 29% (95% CI 20, 38%). For RS assessed by a mix of 8-16G cores the respective upgrade rates were 2% (95% CI 1, 4%), 12% (95% CI 6, 18%) and 11% (95% CI 3, 23%) and for RS assessed by 8–11 vacuum assisted biopsies 1% (95% CI 0, 4%), 5% (95% CI 0, 11%) and 18% for the one study of RS with atypia assessed by VAB. Surgery after VAB excision showed no upgrades. The difference across all subgroups was statistically significant.
When stratified by atypia and biopsy gauge, upgrade rates in RS are consistent and predictable. RS assessed by VABs and lacking atypia have a 1% (95% CI 0, 4%) upgrade rate to DCIS. Other groups have upgrade rates of 2–28%. This risk may be reduced by VAB excision. The results of this meta-analysis provide a decision aid and evidence-based selection criteria for surgery after a needle biopsy diagnosis of RS.
KeywordsRadial scar Breast cancer Screening Mammography Core biopsy
We acknowledge the BreastScreen Australia Clinical Advisory Committee for supporting this work. We thank the editors and anonymous reviewers of the journal whose suggestions have improved the presentation of our work.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Gelareh Farshid and Elizabeth Buckley declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 1.Andacoglu O, Kanbour-Shakir A, Teh YC, Bonaventura M, Ozbek U, Anello M, Ganott M, Kelley J, Dirican A, Soran A (2013) Rationale of excisional biopsy after the diagnosis of benign radial scar on core biopsy: a single institutional outcome analysis. Am J Clin Oncol 36:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0b013e3182354a3f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Berg JC, Visscher DW, Vierkant RA, Pankratz VS, Maloney SD, Lewis JT, Frost MH, Ghosh K, Degnim AC, Brandt KR, Vachon CM, Reynolds CA, Hartmann LC (2008) Breast cancer risk in women with radial scars in benign breast biopsies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 108:167–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9605-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Brenner RJ, Jackman RJ, Parker SH, Evans WP III, Philpotts L, Deutch BM, Lechner MC, Lehrer D, Sylvan P, Hunt R, Adler SJ, Forcier N (2002) Percutaneous core needle biopsy of radial scars of the breast: when is excision necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1179–1184. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Dominguez A, Durando M, Mariscotti G, Angelino F, Castellano I, Bergamasco L, Bianchi CC, Fonio P, Gandini G (2015) Breast cancer risk associated with the diagnosis of a microhistological radial scar (RS): retrospective analysis in 10 years of experience. Radiol Med 120:377–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0456-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Falomo E, Adejumo C, Carson KA, Harvey S, Mullen L, Myers K (2018) Variability in the management recommendations given for high-risk breast lesions detected on image-guided core needle biopsy at U.S. Academic Institutions. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.06.004
- 13.Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA Jr, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ (1999) Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 210:799–805. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.210.3.r99mr19799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Matrai C, D’Alfonso TM, Pharmer L, Drotman MB, Simmons RM, Shin SJ (2015) Advocating nonsurgical management of patients with small, incidental radial scars at the time of needle core biopsy: a study of 77 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 139:1137–1142. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2014-0550-OA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Miller CL, West JA, Bettini AC, Koerner FC, Gudewicz TM, Freer PE, Coopey SB, Gadd MA, Hughes KS, Smith BL, Rafferty E, Specht MC (2014) Surgical excision of radial scars diagnosed by core biopsy may help predict future risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 145:331–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2958-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Park VY, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Yoon JH, Moon HJ (2016) Mammographically occult asymptomatic radial scars/complex sclerosing lesions at ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy: follow-up can be recommended. Ultrasound Med Biol 42:2367–2371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Phantana-Angkool A, Forster MR, Warren YE, Livasy CA, Sobel AH, Beasley LM, Trufan SJ, Hadzikadic-Gusic L, Sarantou T, Voci AE, Sarma D, White RL Jr (2018) Rate of radial scars by core biopsy and upgrading to malignancy or high-risk lesions before and after introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4973-x Google Scholar
- 25.Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Jain KS, Carter D, Lee CH (2000) Uncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importance. Radiology 216:831–837. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se31831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Pinder SE, Shaaban A, Deb R, Desai A, Gandhi A, Lee AHS, Pain S, Wilkinson L, Sharma N (2018) NHS Breast Screening multidisciplinary working group guidelines for the diagnosis and management of breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential on core biopsy (B3 lesions). Clin Radiol 73:682–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2018.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Rageth CJ, O’Flynn EA, Comstock C, Kurtz C, Kubik R, Madjar H, Lepori D, Kampmann G, Mundinger A, Baege A, Decker T, Hosch S, Tausch C, Delaloye JF, Morris E, Varga Z (2016) First International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions). Breast Cancer Res Treat 159:203–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3935-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Rakha EA, Ho BC, Naik V, Sen S, Hamilton LJ, Hodi Z, Ellis IO, Lee AH (2011) Outcome of breast lesions diagnosed as lesion of uncertain malignant potential (B3) or suspicious of malignancy (B4) on needle core biopsy, including detailed review of epithelial atypia. Histopathology 58:626–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03786.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Sanders ME, Page DL, Simpson JF, Schuyler PA, Dale Plummer W, Dupont WD (2006) Interdependence of radial scar and proliferative disease with respect to invasive breast carcinoma risk in patients with benign breast biopsies. Cancer 106:1453–1461. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Sohn VY, Causey MW, Steele SR, Keylock JB, Brown TA (2010) The treatment of radial scars in the modern era–surgical excision is not required. Am Surg 76:522–525Google Scholar