Efficacy of neoadjuvant pertuzumab in addition to chemotherapy and trastuzumab in routine clinical treatment of patients with primary breast cancer: a multicentric analysis
- 400 Downloads
Neoadjuvant combination treatment with chemotherapy (CTX), trastuzumab (TZM), and pertuzumab (PTZ) has been shown to result in higher pathological complete response rates (pCR) in comparison with treatment with chemotherapy and trastuzumab (CTX/TZM). This analysis was aimed at real-world validation of these results from prospective randomized trials.
In a retrospective analysis conducted in the PRAEGNANT network, patients were eligible for inclusion if they had either received neoadjuvant therapy with CTX/TZM or chemotherapy, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (CTX/TZM/PTZ) and subsequently underwent surgery for their primary breast cancer. The effect of the two neoadjuvant regimens on pCR in addition to commonly applicable predictors of pCR was analyzed in 300 patients from three study sites, using logistic regression analyses with treatment arm, age, clinical tumor stage, grading, and hormone receptor status as predictors.
pCR with complete disappearance of all tumor cells was seen in 30.2% (n = 58) of patients treated with CTX/TZM and in 52.8% (n = 57) of those treated with CTX/TZM/PTZ. CTX/TZM/PTZ was positively associated with pCR (adjusted odds ratio 2.44; 95% CI 1.49–4.02). Mastectomy rates were not influenced by the therapy.
The results of clinical trials were confirmed in this dataset of patients who were treated outside of clinical trials in everyday routine work. pCR rates can be improved by 20% with pertuzumab in routine clinical use.
KeywordsBreast cancer Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab Pertuzumab pCR Real-world data Registry
The contribution of Thomas Geyer to this publication was made in partial fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the degree of Doctor of Medicine. Parts of the work published here have been used for his doctoral thesis at the Medical Faculty of Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg (FAU).
The PRAEGNANT network is supported by Grants from Novartis, Celgene, and Pfizer (no Grant Number). The sponsors did not have any involvement in the study design or in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, or the decision to submit this article.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
P.G. has received honoraria from Novartis and financial support for symposia from Novartis, Roche, and PharmaMar. A.D.H. has received honoraria from Teva, GenomicHealth, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. F.A.T. has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, GenomicHealth, Novartis, and Roche. N.N. has received consultancy honoraria from Janssen-Cilag and travel support from Novartis. F.O. has received speaker and consultancy honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, and MSD. P.H. has received honoraria, unrestricted educational grants, and research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. H.T. has received honoraria from Novartis, Roche, Celgene, TEVA, and Pfizer, and travel support from Roche, Celgene, and Pfizer. J.E. has received honoraria from Roche, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and TEVA, and travel support from Celgene, Pfizer, TEVA, and Pierre Fabre. D.L. has received honoraria from Aurikamed, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and L’Oreal. M.W. has received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Celgene, and Novartis. V.M. has received speaker honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Novartis, Roche, Teva, and Janssen-Cilag, and consultancy honoraria from Genomic Health, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Eisai. W.J. has received honoraria and research grants from Novartis. A.S. has received honoraria from Roche, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Zuckschwerdt Verlag GmbH, Georg Thieme Verlag, Aurikamed GmbH, MCI Deutschland GmbH, bsh medical communications GmbH, and promedicis GmbH. M.P.L. has received honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, MSD, Hexal, Novartis, AstraZeneca, TEVA, Celgene, Eisai, medac, and Thieme for advisory boards, lectures, and travel support. C.L. reports personal fees from Celgene, from TEVA, from Pierre Fabre, from Novartis, from Amgen, from Eisai, from GSK, from Roche, from Puma, from Hexal, from Daiichi Sankyo, and from Genomic Health, outside of the submitted research. E.B. received honoraria from Novartis for consulting and clinical research management activities. P.A.F. has received honoraria from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, and Celgene. His institution conducts research for Novartis. H.-C.K. has received honoraria from Carl Zeiss meditec, TEVA, Theraclion, Novartis, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Janssen-Cilag, GSK, LIV Pharma, and Genomic Health. All of the remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, Baselga J, Norton L (2001) Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 344:783–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Gianni L, Dafni U, Gelber RD, Azambuja E, Muehlbauer S, Goldhirsch A, Untch M, Smith I, Baselga J, Jackisch C, Cameron D, Mano M et al (2011) Treatment with trastuzumab for 1 year after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a 4-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 12:236–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ, Jeong JH, Sledge G, Geyer CE Jr, Martino S, Rastogi P, Gralow J, Swain SM, Winer EP, Colon-Otero G et al (2014) Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: planned joint analysis of overall survival from NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831. J Clin Oncol 32:3744–3752CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 9.Untch M, Huober J, Jackisch C, Schneeweiss A, Brucker SY, Dall P, Denkert C, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Gerber B, Janni W, Kuhn T et al (2017) Initial Treatment of Patients with Primary Breast Cancer: Evidence, Controversies, Consensus: Spectrum of Opinion of German Specialists at the 15th International St. Gallen Breast Cancer Conference (Vienna 2017). Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 77:633–644CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 10.von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S, Salat C, Denkert C, Rezai M, Blohmer JU, Jackisch C, Paepke S, Gerber B, Zahm DM, Kummel S et al (2014) Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:747–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, Gerber B, Eiermann W, Hilfrich J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kaufmann M et al (2012) Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 30:1796–1804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Untch M, Loibl S, Bischoff J, Eidtmann H, Kaufmann M, Blohmer JU, Hilfrich J, Strumberg D, Fasching PA, Kreienberg R, Tesch H, Hanusch C et al (2012) Lapatinib versus trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy (GeparQuinto, GBG 44): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:135–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Untch M, Fasching PA, Konecny GE, Hasmuller S, Lebeau A, Kreienberg R, Camara O, Muller V, du Bois A, Kuhn T, Stickeler E, Harbeck N et al (2011) Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab predicts favorable survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: results from the TECHNO trial of the AGO and GBG study groups. J Clin Oncol 29:3351–3357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Coudert BP, Largillier R, Arnould L, Chollet P, Campone M, Coeffic D, Priou F, Gligorov J, Martin X, Trillet-Lenoir V, Weber B, Bleuse JP et al (2007) Multicenter phase II trial of neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, docetaxel, and carboplatin for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-overexpressing stage II or III breast cancer: results of the GETN(A)-1 trial. J Clin Oncol 25:2678–2684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V, Manikhas A, Lluch A, Tjulandin S, Zambetti M, Vazquez F, Byakhow M, Lichinitser M, Climent MA, Ciruelos E et al (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet 375:377–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Fasching PA, Heusinger K, Haeberle L, Niklos M, Hein A, Bayer CM, Rauh C, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bani MR, Schrauder M, Kahmann L, Lux MP et al (2011) Ki67, chemotherapy response, and prognosis in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment. BMC Cancer 11:486CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 19.Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Tseng LM, Liu MC, Lluch A, Staroslawska E, de la Haba-Rodriguez J, Im SA, Pedrini JL, Poirier B, Morandi P et al (2016) 5-year analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 17:791–800CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Slamon DJ, Eiermann W, Robert NJ, Giermek J, Martin M, Jasiowka M, Mackey JR, Chan A, Liu MC, Pinter T, Valero V, Falkson C et al (2016) Ten year follow-up of BCIRG-006 comparing doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (AC -> T) with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel and trastuzumab (AC -> TH) with docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab (TCH) in HER2+ early breast cancer. Cancer Res 5:76Google Scholar
- 21.Cameron D, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Gelber RD, Procter M, Goldhirsch A, de Azambuja E, Castro G Jr, Untch M, Smith I, Gianni L, Baselga J, Al-Sakaff N et al (2017) 11 years’ follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of the HERceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial. Lancet 389:1195–1205CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Roman L, Tseng LM, Liu MC, Lluch A, Staroslawska E, de la Haba-Rodriguez J, Im SA, Pedrini JL, Poirier B et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:25–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T, Harvey V, Eniu A, Hegg R, Tausch C, Seo JH, Tsai YF, Ratnayake J, McNally V, Ross G et al (2013) Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA). Ann Oncol 24:2278–2284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Swain SM, Ewer MS, Viale G, Delaloge S, Ferrero JM, Verrill M, Colomer R, Vieira C, Werner TL, Douthwaite H, Bradley D, Waldron-Lynch M et al (2017) Primary analysis of BERENICE: a phase II cardiac safety study of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage, unilateral, and invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. Cancer Res 77:P4–P21Google Scholar
- 26.Food, Drug Administration US, Perjeta (2017) Highlights of prescribing informatioN https://www.accessdatafdagov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/125409s051lbl.pdf, Accessed August 27, 2013
- 27.European Medicines Agency (2017) Perjeta Product information, Annex I. http://www.emaeuropaeu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/002547/WC500140980.pdf, Accessed August 27, 2013
- 28.German Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) (2016) Beschluss des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über eine Änderung der Arzneimittel-Richtlinie (AM-RL): Anlage XII - Beschlüsse über die Nutzenbewertung von Arzneimitteln mit neuen Wirkstoffen nach § 35a SGB V—Pertuzumab (neues Anwendungsgebiet). Bundesanzeiger 2016;BAnz AT 06.04. B7. https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/39-261-2498/016-02-18_AM-TL-XII_Pertuzumab-nAWG_015-09-01-D-177_BAnz.pdf, Assessed August 27
- 30.Fasching PA, Brucker SY, Fehm TN, Overkamp F, Janni W, Wallwiener M, Hadji P, Belleville E, Haberle L, Taran FA, Luftner D, Lux MP et al (2015) Biomarkers in patients with metastatic breast cancer and the praegnant study network. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 75:41–50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 31.Hein A, Gass P, Walter CB, Taran FA, Hartkopf A, Overkamp F, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Ettl J, Wuerstlein R, Lounsbury D et al (2016) Computerized patient identification for the EMBRACA clinical trial using real-time data from the PRAEGNANT network for metastatic breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 158:59–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Fremd C, Hack CC, Schneeweiss A, Rauch G, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Taran FA, Hartkopf A, Overkamp F, Tesch H, Fehm T, Hadji P et al (2017) Use of complementary and integrative medicine among German breast cancer patients: predictors and implications for patient care within the PRAEGNANT study network. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:1239–1245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Salmen J, Neugebauer J, Fasching PA, Haeberle L, Huober J, Wockel A, Rauh C, Schuetz F, Weissenbacher T, Kost B, Stickeler E, Klar M et al (2014) Pooled analysis of the prognostic relevance of progesterone receptor status in five German cohort studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 148:143–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Haberle L, Fasching PA, Brehm B, Heusinger K, Jud SM, Loehberg CR, Hack CC, Preuss C, Lux MP, Hartmann A, Vachon CM, Meier-Meitinger M et al (2016) Mammographic density is the main correlate of tumors detected on ultrasound but not on mammography. Int J Cancer 139:1967–1974CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Burghaus S, Haberle L, Schrauder MG, Heusinger K, Thiel FC, Hein A, Wachter D, Strehl J, Hartmann A, Ekici AB, Renner SP, Beckmann MW et al (2015) Endometriosis as a risk factor for ovarian or endometrial cancer—results of a hospital-based case-control study. BMC cancer 15:751CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 36.Beitsch P, Whitworth P, Baron P, Rotkis MC, Mislowsky AM, Richards PD, Murray MK, Pellicane JV, Dul CL, Nash CH, Stork-Sloots L, de Snoo F et al (2017) Pertuzumab/trastuzumab/CT versus trastuzumab/CT therapy for HER2+ breast cancer: results from the prospective Neoadjuvant Breast Registry Symphony Trial (NBRST). Ann Surg Oncol 24:2539–2546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.Squires H, Pandor A, Thokala P, Stevens JW, Kaltenthaler E, Clowes M, Coleman R, Wyld L (2017) Pertuzumab for the neoadjuvant treatment of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer: an evidence review group perspective of a NICE single technology appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 7:10Google Scholar