Effectiveness and tolerability of neoadjuvant pertuzumab-containing regimens for HER2-positive localized breast cancer
- 46 Downloads
Based on improvement in pathologic complete response (pCR) in the NeoSphere and TRYPHAENA studies, the FDA approved neoadjuvant pertuzumab for HER2+ localized breast cancer. These studies demonstrated high pCR rates with THP (docetaxel + HP), FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide)-THP, and TCHP (docetaxel, carboplatin + HP). However, in the United States, doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) is favored over FEC despite no data comparing neoadjuvant AC-THP with AC-TH or TCHP. Here we report outcomes for patients with localized HER2+ breast cancer treated with pertuzumab-containing neoadjuvant regimens and AC-TH.
We reviewed clinicopathological characteristics of patients with HER2+ breast cancer (Stage I–III) treated with either a neoadjuvant pertuzumab-containing regimen or dose-dense (dd) AC-TH, from 2011 to 2016 at a large academic medical institution and two affiliated community sites. pCR was defined as ypT0/is ypN0. Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis.
In this study (N = 121), pCR was numerically higher with pertuzumab-based regimens, including ddAC-THP (60%), TCHP (63%), THP (55%), as compared with ddAC-TH (46%). THP resulted in significantly less cycle delays due to toxicity compared to the other regimens (p = 0.02). THP also resulted in the least dose reductions, lowest rate of hospitalization, and lowest rate of treatment discontinuation.
Pertuzumab-based regimens, including THP, resulted in higher pCR rates as compared to ddAC-TH, with the THP regimen associated with the best tolerability among patients with localized HER2+ breast cancer. Given the various neoadjuvant regimens, additional studies are needed to determine optimal treatment sequencing and escalation/de-escalation strategies to personalize neoadjuvant regimens for localized HER2+ breast cancer.
KeywordsNeoadjuvant HER2 Pathologic complete response Pertuzumab Trastuzumab
This work was supported by NIH Grant KL2 TR001100 (to L.S) and Susan G Komen CCR15224703 (to A.B.).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All the authors declared that they have no relevant conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 14.US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Guidance for Industry: Pathological Complete Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of High-Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Use as an Endpoint to Support Accelerated Approval. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm305501.pdf. Accessed 13 Jul 2016
- 15.Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im Y-H et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70336-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T et al (2013) Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA). Ann Oncol 24:2278–2284. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt182 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Hicks DG et al (2013) Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 31:3997–4013. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Hammond MEH, Hayes DF, Dowsett M et al (2010) American society of clinical oncology/college of American pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:2784–2795. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6529 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Swain SM, Ewer MS, Viale G et al (2018) Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and standard anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy for the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with HER2-positive localized breast cancer (BERENICE): a phase II, open-label, multicenter, multinational cardiac safety study. Ann Oncol 29:646–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx773 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C et al (2003) randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of intergroup trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 21:1431–1439. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.09.081 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Singh JC, Mamtani A, Barrio A et al (2017) pathologic complete response with neoadjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early stage breast cancer: a single center experience. Oncologist 22:139–143. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0268 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.Chan A, Delaloge S, Holmes FA et al (2016) Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17:367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00551-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar