Identifying adherence barriers to oral endocrine therapy among breast cancer survivors
Approximately 70–80% of breast cancers are hormone receptor-positive (HR+). OET, including tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors, is considered standard adjuvant therapy for HR+ breast cancer. Despite demonstrated benefits, nearly half of patients are non-adherent and over two-thirds discontinue therapy before the recommended 5 years. Our objective was to identify and summarize literature-reported barriers associated with non-adherence/non-persistence to OET among breast cancer survivors.
A PUBMED literature search was conducted using the following terms: ‘breast cancer,’ ‘oral endocrine therapy’ or ‘Tamoxifen’ or ‘Aromatase Inhibitors,’ ‘adherence,’ or ‘barriers.’ The search was restricted to past six years. The abstracts of each result were reviewed and categorized as either patient-reported or physician-reported. All patient- and physician-reported factors that affected adherence and persistence were listed and grouped together into the three main categories: Socio-demographic and medical parameters, general psychosocial parameters, and psychosocial parameters related to OET.
A total of 320 articles were identified, of which 19 met inclusion criteria. Adverse drug reactions were the most commonly reported barrier but were generally underreported among physicians. Among patient-reported barriers, common social-demographic and medical parameters were age, comorbidity, and financial status. General psychosocial variables were lack of patient–provider communication, depressive symptoms, and lack of perceived self-efficacy. Treatment toxicity was the most commonly reported psychosocial parameter related to OET.
The determinants of non-adherence and non-persistence are multi-dimensional and influenced by several factors. The three categories of adherence barriers should be evaluated and considered when designing future interventions to enhance OET adherence for a tailored approach.
KeywordsBreast cancer Oral endocrine therapy Barriers Adherence
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Rutugandha Paranjpe declares that she has no conflict of interest. Grace John declares that she has no conflict of interest. Meghana Trivedi declares that she has no conflict of interest. Susan Abughosh declares that she has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Hence, it does not need any human consent.
- 12.Tinari N, Fanizza C, Romero M, Gambale E, Moscetti L, Vaccaro A, Seminara P, Longo F, Gori S, Vici P et al (2015) Identification of subgroups of early breast cancer patients at high risk of nonadherence to adjuvant hormone therapy: results of an Italian survey. Clin Breast Cancer 15(2):e131–e137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Font R, Espinas JA, Gil-Gil M, Barnadas A, Ojeda B, Tusquets I, Segui MA, Margeli M, Arcusa A, Prat A et al (2012) Prescription refill, patient self-report and physician report in assessing adherence to oral endocrine therapy in early breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study in Catalonia, Spain. Br J Cancer 107(8):1249–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Karmakar M, Pinto SL, Jordan TR, Mohamed I, Holiday-Goodman M (2017) Predicting adherence to aromatase inhibitor therapy among breast cancer survivors: an application of the protection motivation theory. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 11:1178223417694520Google Scholar
- 32.Bertelli G, Venturini M, Del Mastro L, Bergaglio M, Sismondi P, Biglia N, Venturini S, Porcile G, Pronzato P, Costantini M et al (2002) Intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone versus oral megestrol for the control of postmenopausal hot flashes in breast cancer patients: a randomized study. Ann Oncol 13(6):883–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Abughosh S, Wang X, Serna O, Esse T, Mann A, Masilamani S, Holstad MM, Essien EJ, Fleming M (2017) A motivational interviewing intervention by pharmacy students to improve medication adherence. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 23(5):549–560Google Scholar