Combination of different types of elastography in downgrading ultrasound Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System category 4a breast lesions
- 167 Downloads
To determine whether a combination of different types of elastography could improve the accuracy of elastography-aided downgrading ultrasound (US) Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4a lesions.
Materials and methods
From January 2016 to May 2018, 458 consecutive women with 494 US BI-RADS category 4a breast lesions were enrolled in the prospective study. These lesions were subject to conventional US supplemented with strain elastography of elasticity imaging (EI), virtual touch tissue imaging (VTI), and shear wave elastography of virtual touch imaging quantification (VTIQ). Diagnostic performances were calculated for BI-RADS, EI, VTI, and VTIQ as well as the combination of EI, VTI, and VTIQ (combination of EI and VTI [EI + VTI], combination of EI and VTIQ [EI + VTIQ], and combination of VTI and VTIQ [VTI + VTIQ]).
Pathologically, 445 lesions (90.1%) were benign, and 49 (9.9%) were malignant. The specificities of EI, VTI, and VTIQ were significantly higher than those of BI-RADS (69.9%, 83.8%, 75.5% vs. 0, respectively, P < 0.001), while their sensitivities were significantly lower than those of BI-RADS (83.7%, 73.5%, 65.3% vs. 100%, respectively, P < 0.05). Among the combinations, EI + VTI and EI + VTIQ showed similar sensitivity to BI-RADS (98% vs 100%, P = 1.000; 93.9% vs 100%, P = 0.25), while the specificity of EI + VTI was significantly higher than that of EI + VTIQ and BI-RADS (P < 0.001). When using EI + VTI to downgrade lesions, 58.7% of these lesions were downgraded, among those 99.7% were benign.
Combinations of EI and VTI to downgrade BI-RADS category 4a lesions may reduce the misdiagnosis of breast cancers and the number of unnecessary biopsies.
KeywordsBreast Neoplasms Ultrasonography Elasticity imaging techniques Sensitivity Specificity
Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System
Virtual touch tissue imaging
Virtual touch imaging quantification
Shear wave velocity
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
- EI + VTI
Combination of EI and VTI
- EI + VTIQ
Combination of EI and VTIQ
- VTI + VTIQ
Combination of VTI and VTIQ
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The experiments comply with the current laws of China.
Verbal informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Hille H, Jung I, Park J et al (2016) Is mammography superior to breast ultrasound? Some remarks to: Moon HJ. Ultraschall in Med 2015 36:255–263Google Scholar
- 3.Moon HJ, Jung I, Park SJ, Kim MJ, Youk JH, Kim EK (2015) Comparison of cancer yields and diagnostic performance of screening mammography vs. supplemental screening ultrasound in 4394 women with average risk for breast cancer. Ultraschall Med 36:255–263Google Scholar
- 22.Shikhman R, Keppke AL (2018) Breast, Imaging, Reporting and Data System (BI RADS)Google Scholar