Take care of your neighborhood
Urban women in certain Washington, DC neighborhoods present with advanced breast cancer at high rates despite access to health insurance and health care.
Through a two-phase intervention, community health workers (CHWs) educated and surveyed individuals regarding healthcare utilization and breast health and cancer awareness. In phase I, CHWs educated and administered a survey to 1092 women, of whom 95.1% had health insurance, in an attempt to explain the high rate of advanced breast cancer despite having health insurance. In phase II, a targeted CHW-administered intervention was designed based on data collected from the phase I survey, and provided to 658 women. Preintervention and postintervention surveys were administered to assess its impact on knowledge and beliefs about breast health and cancer screening.
During phase I, respondents most often identified personal factors (28.7%) and fear (27.7%) to explain the high rate of advanced breast cancer despite health insurance status. In phase II, the intervention improved perceptions of the safety and efficacy of mammograms with an absolute 15.4% increase in the respondents who believed that “A mammogram is the safest and most effective test available for finding early breast cancer.” Perceived barriers discouraging mammograms were access (17.0%), pain (13.2%), and education (13.1%).
Among an urban population of predominantly insured women with high rates of advanced breast cancer at diagnosis, personal factors and fear were cited as the greatest barriers to breast cancer screening. Educational intervention by CHWs showed a positive impact on respondents’ perceptions regarding mammogram safety and efficacy.
KeywordsBreast cancer Community health worker Disparity Health insurance Mammogram
The authors wish to thank the patients and investigators who participated in this study, T. Blaise Springfield of Georgetown University for his help with manuscript development, and Phillips Gilmore Oncology Communications for editorial assistance.
The work was funded by the Avon Foundation for Women (Breast Cancer Safety Net Grants 05-2014-018 and 05-2015-015); the Four Seasons Hotel, Washington, DC; and MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no financial relationships or conflicts of interest to report.
All human investigations were performed after approval by the MedStar Health Research Institute Institutional Review Board (“IRB”) in accordance with an assurance registered under FWA00000504 filed with and approved by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Documentation of consent was waived by the IRB given that all surveys administered during study implementation were anonymized.
- 1.Affordable Health California. Affordable Care Act history. http://affordablehealthca.com/history-affordable-care-act/. Accessed 2 Aug 2017
- 7.Bhutta Z, Lassi Z, Pariyo G, Huicho L (2010) Global experience of community health workers for delivery of health related millennium development goals: a systematic review, country case studies, and recommendations for integration into national health systems. Geneva: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/resources/chwreport/en/. Accessed 2 Aug 2017
- 17.DC office of planning. Demographic and housing profiles 2010 by ward. https://planning.dc.gov/node/596612. Accessed 2 Aug 2017
- 18.District of Columbia Cancer Registry Bureau of Cancer and Chronic Diseases Community Health Administration. Burden of cancer in the District of Columbia. April 2014. https://doh.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/doh/DOH_BurdenOfCancer_V5.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2017
- 19.American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures for African Americans: 2016–2018. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/cancer-facts-and-figures-for-african-americans/cancer-facts-and-figures-for-african-americans-2016-2018.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2017
- 23.Steele SL, Lewis-Jack O (2005) Psychological and neuropsychological predictors of non-compliance to mammography screening among high-risk African American women. Annual Summary Report. US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, Fort DerickGoogle Scholar
- 24.Davis C (2014) A comparison of compliance and noncompliance in breast cancer screening among African American women. Presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Social Work and Research. January 18, 2014. San Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar