The impact of mastectomy type on the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), satisfaction with appearance, and the reconstructed breast’s role in intimacy
- 612 Downloads
As mastectomy rates increase and overall survival for early breast cancer improves, a better understanding of the long-term consequences of mastectomy is needed. We sought to explore the correlation of specific mastectomy type with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), body image satisfaction, and the reconstructed breast’s role in intimacy.
This study is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey including a retrospective chart review. Patients at least one year from primary surgery were invited to complete the survey between 2012 and 2014. Baseline characteristics and survey responses were compared between three mastectomy groups: total/modified radical (TMRM), skin-sparing (SSM), and nipple-sparing (NSM). All patients underwent reconstruction.
Of 453 invited, 268 (59%) completed the survey. Sixty underwent mastectomy with reconstruction: 16 (27%) TMRM, 36 (60%) SSM, and 8 (13%) NSM. There were no significant differences in median total FSFI scores between groups, yet median FSFI scores for the NSM group indicated sexual dysfunction. After adjusting for receipt of chemotherapy and/or radiation, NSM had the lowest median desire score. There was a trend for the NSM group to be the least satisfied with postoperative appearance, but also more likely to report that the chest was “often” caressed during intimacy. However, nearly 40% of the NSM group reported that caress of the reconstructed breast was unpleasant.
NSM offers patients the greatest opportunity for preservation of their native skin envelope and potentially enhanced cosmetic outcome, but our results did not demonstrate superior sexual function or body image outcomes in this group. By highlighting surgical consequences of mastectomy preoperatively, surgeons may better set realistic patient expectations regarding both aesthetic and functional outcomes after breast cancer surgery. With clearer expectations, patients will have a better opportunity for improved surgical decision-making.
KeywordsBreast cancer Mastectomy Sexuality Survivorship Intimacy Nipple sparing Mastectomy
We would like to thank all of the patients who participated in our study, as well as Sara Fogarty D.O., Sarah Pesek M.D., and Rebecca Kwait M.D. for their contribution to the study. We would also like to thank the dedicated employees of Women & Infants Breast Health Center.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no financial relationships related to this manuscript to disclose.
- 1.Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1233–1241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Rosenberg S (2013) Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey. Breast 24(Suppl 2):S154Google Scholar
- 6.Frost MH, Hoskin TL, Hartmann LC, Degnim AC, Johnson JL, Boughey JC (2011) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: long-term consistency of satisfaction and adverse effects and the significance of informed decision-making, quality of life, and personality traits. Ann Surg Oncol 18(11):3110–3116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar