Advertisement

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 162, Issue 3, pp 465–477 | Cite as

Opposing roles of Nfkb2 gene products p100 and p52 in the regulation of breast cancer stem cells

  • Syn Kok YeoEmail author
  • Rhiannon French
  • Filomena Spada
  • Richard Clarkson
Preclinical study

Abstract

Purpose

Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signalling has been shown to regulate properties of breast cancer stem cells. However, the specific contribution of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway, components of which are elevated in aggressive breast cancer has not been addressed.

Methods

Through shRNA silencing of the Nfkb2 gene, the role of p100/p52 in 4T1 and N202.1A cell lines were assessed by NF-κB reporter, invasion, tumoursphere and orthotopic transplantation assays. The processing of p100 into p52 was also inhibited with a p97 ATPase inhibitor, NMS-873, and its effects on tumoursphere formation was assessed.

Results

Knockdown of Nfkb2 led to opposing changes in NF-κB-dependent transcription. NF-κB activity was elevated in 4T1 cells and this resulted in increased motility, cancer stem cell (CSC) activity and tumourigenicity in vivo. Conversely, depletion of Nfkb2 in N202.1a cells decreased NF-κB activity, CSC properties and tumourigenicity in vivo. By selectively overexpressing the p52 subunit in Nfkb2 depleted cells, we found that the increased malignancy in 4T1 cells could not be reverted in the presence of p52, whereas the decreased tumourigenicity of N202.1a cells could be rescued by p52. These results indicate that p100 and its subunit p52 have opposing effects on breast CSC activity. Accordingly, inhibition of an upstream regulator of p100 processing was effective in reducing tumoursphere formation of N202.1A and SKBR3 (ErbB2 HIGH) cells without aggravating that of 4T1 and MDA-MB-231 (ErbB2LOW) cells.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that inhibiting the processing of p100 may be a potential therapeutic strategy to suppress CSC activity in a subset of breast tumours.

Keywords

Breast cancer Nfkb2 NF-KappaB Cancer stem cell ErbB2 p97 ATPase 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to Derek Scarborough from the Histology Unit for assistance with histology and processing of tissues and the animal research facility at Cardiff University. We also appreciate the kind feedback and assistance given by Nader Omidvar, Alison Wakefield, Luke Piggott and Joseph Farmer. This work was supported by a Breast Cancer Campaign PhD studentship Grant (2007NovPhD06) awarded to R. Clarkson. We would also like to acknowledge the contribution of specimen donors and research groups who have contributed to the TCGA Breast dataset.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

The authors declare that the experiments performed in the current publication comply with the current laws of the United Kingdom and all maintenance, breeding and scientific procedures involving animals were carried out according to the guidelines set by the U.K. Home Office Regulations Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.

Supplementary material

10549_2017_4149_MOESM1_ESM.tif (70 kb)
Silencing of Nfkb2 does not affect the proliferation and colony-forming potential of mammary cancer cell lines. a Immunoblot showing the levels of p100 and p52 in 4T1 and N202.1A cells after transduction with Non-Target (NT) or Nfkb2 shRNA. Growth curves showing the number of cells over time for (b) 4T1 and (c) N202.1A cells. d Colony-forming assay of 4T1 and N202.1A cells seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 1000 cells/well and quantified after 7 days. Data points represent average of at least n = 6 and error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM). N.S. indicates a non-significant difference, where statistical significance relative to NT controls was determined by two-tailed t-test. Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 70 kb)
10549_2017_4149_MOESM2_ESM.tif (66 kb)
Silencing of Nfkb2 with independent shRNAs in 4T1 cells. a Immunoblot showing levels of p100 and p52 after knockdown with non-target, p52 sh43 or p52 sh44 in 4T1 cells. b Bar chart showing number of migrated cells in a 10 × field of view for Boyden chamber migration assays of 4T1 non-target, p52 sh43 or p52 sh44 cells. c Bar chart showing number of spheres formed for mammosphere-forming assays of 4T1 non-target, p52 sh43 or p52 sh44 cells. Supplementary material 2 (TIFF 66 kb)
10549_2017_4149_MOESM3_ESM.tif (116 kb)
Effects of NMS-873 treatment on CSC marker expression in human breast cancer cell lines. a Representative dot plots showing expression of CD44 + and CD24 + in MDA-MB-231 and SKBR3 cell lines treated with vehicle or 1 μM NMS-873 for 48 h under normal culture conditions and analysed by flow cytometry. Bar charts showing the percentage of b CD44+CD24, c CD44+CD24+, or d CD44CD24+ populations. Data points represent average of at least n = 6 and error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM), **indicates p < 0.01, where statistical significance relative to vehicle controls was determined by two-tailed t-test. Supplementary material 3 (TIFF 116 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Northern Ireland Cancer Registry (2010) Cancer Incidence and MortalityGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Office for National Statistics (2010) Cancer Statistics registrations: Registrations of cancer diagnosed in 2007Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit (2010) Cancer Incidence in WalesGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferlay J et al (2013) GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and mortality worldwide. IARC CancerBase No.11, LyonGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perou C, Sorlie T, Eisen M (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sorlie T, Perou C, Tibshirani R (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. PNAS 98(19):10869–10874CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Furth J, Kahn M (1937) The transmission of leukemia of mice with a single cell. Am J Cancer 31:276–282Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lapidot T et al (1994) A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice. Nature 367:645–648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Al-Hajj M et al (2003) Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. PNAS 100(7):3983–3988CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li X et al (2008) Intrinsic resistance of tumorigenic breast cancer cells to chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(9):672–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diehn M et al (2009) Association of reactive oxygen species levels and radioresistance in cancer stem cells. Nature 458(7239):780–783CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tam WL et al (2013) Protein kinase C alpha is a central signaling node and therapeutic target for breast cancer stem cells. Cancer Cell 24(3):347–364CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Piggott L et al (2011) Suppression of apoptosis inhibitor c-FLIP selectively eliminates breast cancer stem cell activity in response to the anti-cancer agent, TRAIL. Breast Cancer Res 13(5):R88CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yeo SK et al (2016) Autophagy differentially regulates distinct breast cancer stem-like cells in murine models via EGFR/Stat3 and Tgfβ/Smad signaling. Cancer Res 76(11):3397–3410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baud V, Karin M (2009) Is NF-kB a good target for cancer therapy? Hopes and pitfalls. Nat Rev Drug Discovery 8:33–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perkins N (2007) Integrating cell-signalling pathways with NF-kB and IKK function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:49–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Busino L et al (2012) Fbxw7α- and GSK3-mediated degradation of p100 is a pro-survival mechanism in multiple myeloma. Nat Cell Biol 14(4):375–385CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fukushima H et al (2012) SCF(Fbw7) modulates the NFkB signaling pathway by targeting NFkB2 for ubiquitination and destruction. Cell Rep 1(5):434–443CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang Z et al (2015) The transitional endoplasmic reticulum ATPase p97 regulates the alternative nuclear factor NF-κB signaling via partial degradation of the NF-κB subunit p100. J Biol Chem 290(32):19558–19568CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Curtis C, Shah S, Chin S-F (2012) The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 486(7403):346–352PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu M et al (2010) The canonical NF-kappaB pathway governs mammary tumorigenesis in transgenic mice and tumor stem cell expansion. Cancer Res 70(24):10464–10473CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pratt M et al (2009) The canonical NF-kB pathway is required for formation of luminal mammary neoplasias and is activated in the mammary progenitor population. Oncogene 8:2710–2722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Biswas DK, Iglehart JD (2006) Linkage between EGFR family receptors and nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) signaling in breast cancer. J Cell Physiol 209(3):645–652CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nakshatri H et al (1997) Constitutive activation of NF-kappaB during progression of breast cancer to hormone-independent growth. Mol Cell Biol 17(7):3629–3639CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rocha S et al (2003) p53 represses cyclin D1 transcription through down regulation of Bcl-3 and inducing increased association of the p52 NF-kB subunit with histone deacetylase 1. Mol Cell Biol 23(13):4713–4727CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Viatour P et al (2003) NF-kappa B2/p100 induces Bcl-2 expression. Leukemia 17:1349–1356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cogswell P et al (2000) Selective activation of NF-kappa B subunits in human breast cancer: potential roles for NF-kappa B2/p52 and for Bcl-3. Oncogene 19(9):1123–1131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dejardin E et al (1995) Highly-expressed p100/p52 (NFKB2) sequesters other NF-kappa B-related proteins in the cytoplasm of human breast cancer cells. Oncogene 11(9):1835–1841PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kendellen MF et al (2014) Canonical and non-canonical NF-kappaB signaling promotes breast cancer tumor-initiating cells. Oncogene 33(10):1297–1305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aslakson CJ, Miller FR (1992) Selective events in the metastatic process defined by analysis of the sequential dissemination of subpopulations of a mouse mammary tumor. Cancer Res 52:1399–1405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nanni P et al (2000) p185neu protein is required for tumor and anchorage-independent growth, not for cell proliferation of transgenic mammary carcinoma. Int J Cancer 87:186–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-deltadeltaCT method. Methods 25(4):402–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Huber MA et al (2004) NF-kB is essential for epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in a model of breast cancer progression. J Clin Invest 114:569–581CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kouros-Mehr H et al (2008) GATA-3 links tumor differentiation and dissemination in a luminal breast cancer model. Cancer Cell 13(2):141–152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cerami E et al (2012) The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov 2(5):401–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gao J et al. (2013) Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal 6(269): pl1Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cao Y, Luo J, Karin M (2007) IkB kinase kinase activity is required for self-renewal of ErbB2/Her2-transformed mammary tumor-initiating cells. PNAS 104(40):15852–15857CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vazquez-Santillan K et al (2016) NF-kappaΒ-inducing kinase regulates stem cell phenotype in breast cancer. Sci Rep 6:37340CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cao Y, Luo JL, Karin M (2007) IkappaB kinase alpha kinase activity is required for self-renewal of ErbB2/Her2-transformed mammary tumor-initiating cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(40):15852–15857CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yamaguchi N et al (2009) Constitutive activation of nuclear factor-kappaB is preferentially involved in the proliferation of basal-like subtype breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Sci 100(9):1668–1674CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yamamoto M et al (2010) Epigenetic alteration of the NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK) gene is involved in enhanced NIK expression in basal-like breast cancer. Cancer Sci 101(11):2391–2397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wakefield A et al (2013) Bcl3 selectively promotes metastasis of ERBB2-driven mammary tumors. Cancer Res 73(2):745–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liu S et al (2014) Breast cancer stem cells transition between epithelial and mesenchymal states reflective of their normal counterparts. Stem Cell Reports 2(1):78–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ithimakin S et al (2013) HER2 drives luminal breast cancer stem cells in the absence of HER2 amplification: implications for efficacy of adjuvant trastuzumab. Cancer Res 73(5):1635–1646CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Korkaya H et al (2008) HER2 regulates the mammary stem/progenitor cell population driving tumorigenesis and invasion. Oncogene 27(47):6120–6130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jordan NV et al (2016) HER2 expression identifies dynamic functional states within circulating breast cancer cells. Nature 537(7618):102–106CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Drooger JC et al (2013) Denosumab in breast cancer treatment. Eur J Pharmacol 717(1–3):12–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ahmed MA et al (2012) A CD44/CD24+ phenotype is a poor prognostic marker in early invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133(3):979–995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Dan T et al (2014) CD44 is prognostic for overall survival in the NCI randomized trial on breast conservation with 25 year follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat 143(1):11–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Martin TA, Jiang WG (2014) Evaluation of the expression of stem cell markers in human breast cancer reveals a correlation with clinical progression and metastatic disease in ductal carcinoma. Oncol Rep 31(1):262–272PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Syn Kok Yeo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rhiannon French
    • 2
  • Filomena Spada
    • 2
  • Richard Clarkson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Cancer BiologyUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.European Cancer Stem Cell Research Institute, School of BiosciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations