Advertisement

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 161, Issue 3, pp 567–574 | Cite as

An Antiestrogenic Activity Score for tamoxifen and its metabolites is associated with breast cancer outcome

  • A. H. M. de Vries SchultinkEmail author
  • X. Alexi
  • E. van Werkhoven
  • L. Madlensky
  • L. Natarajan
  • S. W. Flatt
  • W. Zwart
  • S. C. Linn
  • B. A. Parker
  • A. H. B. Wu
  • J. P. Pierce
  • A. D. R. Huitema
  • J. H. Beijnen
Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose

Endoxifen concentrations have been associated with breast cancer recurrence in tamoxifen-treated patients. However, tamoxifen itself and other metabolites also show antiestrogenic anti-tumor activity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a comprehensive Antiestrogenic Activity Score (AAS), which accounts for concentration and antiestrogenic activity of tamoxifen and three metabolites. An association between the AAS and recurrence-free survival was investigated and compared to a previously published threshold for endoxifen concentrations of 5.97 ng/mL.

Patients and methods

The antiestrogenic activities of tamoxifen, (Z)-endoxifen, (Z)-4-hydroxytamoxifen, and N-desmethyltamoxifen were determined in a cell proliferation assay. The AAS was determined by calculating the sum of each metabolite concentration multiplied by an IC50 ratio, relative to tamoxifen. The AAS was calculated for 1370 patients with estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-positive breast cancer. An association between AAS and recurrence was investigated using Cox regression and compared with the 5.97 ng/mL endoxifen threshold using concordance indices.

Results

An AAS threshold of 1798 was associated with recurrence-free survival, hazard ratio (HR) 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47–0.96), bias corrected after bootstrap HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.48–0.99). The concordance indices for AAS and endoxifen did not significantly differ; however, using the AAS threshold instead of endoxifen led to different dose recommendations for 5.2% of the patients.

Conclusions

Endoxifen concentrations can serve as a proxy for the antiestrogenic effect of tamoxifen and metabolites. However, for the aggregate effect of tamoxifen and three metabolites, defined by an integrative algorithm, a trend towards improving treatment is seen and moreover, is significantly associated with breast cancer recurrence.

Keywords

Tamoxifen Metabolites Algorithm Recurrence-free survival 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by data from the WHEL study, which was initiated with the support of the Walton Family Foundation and was continued with funding from National Cancer Institute (CA69375). SC Linn received research funding from A Sister’s Hope. L Natarajan was partially supported by funding from the National Cancer Institute R01 (CA166293). BA Parker received (institutional) research funding from Genentech, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10549_2016_4083_MOESM1_ESM.docx (88 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 88 kb)
10549_2016_4083_MOESM2_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 15 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival : an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J et al (2013) Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet 381:805–816CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gray R, Rea D, Handley K (2013) ATTom: Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years in 6,953 women with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 31: suppl; abstr 5Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Regan MM, Neven P, Giobbie-Hurder A et al (2011) Assessment of letrozole and tamoxifen alone and in sequence for postmenopausal women with steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the BIG 1-98 randomised clinical trial at 8·1 years median follow-up. Lancet Oncol 12:1101–1108CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Winer EP, Hudis C, Burstein HJ et al (2005) American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: status report 2004. J Clin Oncol 23:619–629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pagani O, Regan MM, Walley BA et al (2014) Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 371:107–118CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Francis PA, Regan MM, Fleming GF et al (2015) Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 372:436–446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 378:771–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goetz MP, Suman VJ, Hoskin TL et al (2013) CYP2D6 metabolism and patient outcome in the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group Trial (ABCSG) 8. Clin Cancer Res 19:500–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schroth W, Goetz MP, Hamann U et al (2009) Association between CYP2D6 polymorphisms and outcomes among women with early stage breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. JAMA 302:1429–1436CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rae JM, Drury S, Hayes DF et al (2012) CYP2D6 and UGT2B7 genotype and risk of recurrence in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:452–460CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Regan MM, Leyland-Jones B, Bouzyk M et al (2012) CYP2D6 genotype and tamoxifen response in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: the breast international group 1-98 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:441–451CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Madlensky L, Natarajan L, Tchu S et al (2011) Tamoxifen metabolite concentrations, CYP2D6 genotype, and breast cancer outcomes. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89:718–725CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saladores P, Mürdter T, Eccles D et al (2015) Tamoxifen metabolism predicts drug concentrations and outcome in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer. Pharmacogenomics J 15:84–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Desta Z, Ward BA, Soukhova NV, Flockhart DA (2004) Comprehensive evaluation of tamoxifen sequential biotransformation by the human cytochrome P450 system in vitro : prominent roles for CYP3A and CYP2D6. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 310:1062–1075CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    de Vries Schultink AHM, Zwart W, Linn SC et al (2015) Effects of pharmacogenetics on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tamoxifen. Clin Pharmacokinet 54:797–810CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mürdter TE, Schroth W, Bacchus-Gerybadze L et al (2011) Activity levels of tamoxifen metabolites at the estrogen receptor and the impact of genetic polymorphisms of phase I and II enzymes on their concentration levels in plasma. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89:708–717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teft WA, Gong IY, Dingle B et al (2013) CYP3A4 and seasonal variation in vitamin D status in addition to CYP2D6 contribute to therapeutic endoxifen level during tamoxifen therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 139:95–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wu AHB, Lorizio W, Tchu S et al (2012) Estimation of tamoxifen metabolite concentrations in the blood of breast cancer patients through CYP2D6 genotype activity score. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133:677–683CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jager NGL, Linn SC, Schellens JHM, Beijnen JH (2015) Tailored tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer patients: a perspective. Clin Breast Cancer 15:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lim YC, Desta Z, Flockhart DA, Skaar TC (2005) Endoxifen (4-hydroxy-N-desmethyl-tamoxifen) has anti-estrogenic effects in breast cancer cells with potency similar to 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 55:471–478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Coezy E, Borgna J, Rochefort H (1982) Tamoxifen and metabolites in MCF 7 cells : correlation between binding to estrogen receptor and inhibition of cell growth tamoxifen and metabolites in MCF7 cells : correlation between binding. Cancer Res 41:317–323Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnson MD, Zuo H, Lee K et al (2004) Pharmacological characterization of 4-hydroxy-N-desmethyl tamoxifen, a novel active metabolite of tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res Treat 85:151–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jin Y, Desta Z, Stearns V et al (2005) CYP2D6 genotype, antidepressant use, and tamoxifen metabolism during adjuvant breast cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:30–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lim H-S, Ju Lee H, Seok Lee K et al (2007) Clinical implications of CYP2D6 genotypes predictive of tamoxifen pharmacokinetics in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:3837–3845CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stearns V, Johnson M, Rae J et al (2003) Active tamoxifen metabolite plasma concentrations after coadministration of tamoxifen and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1758–1764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Teunissen SF, Jager NGL, Rosing H et al (2011) Development and validation of a quantitative assay for the determination of tamoxifen and its five main phase I metabolites in human serum using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 879:1677–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pierce JP, Natarajan L, Caan BJ et al (2007) Influence of a diet very high in vegetables, fruit, and fiber and low in fat on prognosis following treatment for breast cancer: the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) randomized trial. JAMA 298:289–298CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Barginear MF, Jaremko M, Peter I et al (2011) Increasing tamoxifen dose in breast cancer patients based on CYP2D6 genotypes and endoxifen levels: effect on active metabolite isomers and the antiestrogenic activity score. Clin Pharmacol Ther 90:605–611CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  31. 31.
    Maximov PY, McDaniel RE, Fernandes DJ et al (2014) Simulation with cells in vitro of tamoxifen treatment in premenopausal breast cancer patients with different CYP2D6 genotypes. Br J Pharmacol 171:5624–5635CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maximov PY, McDaniel RE, Fernandes DJ et al (2014) Pharmacological relevance of endoxifen in a laboratory simulation of breast cancer in postmenopausal patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jager NGL, Rosing H, Linn SC et al (2012) Importance of highly selective LC-MS/MS analysis for the accurate quantification of tamoxifen and its metabolites: focus on endoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133:793–798CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. H. M. de Vries Schultink
    • 1
    Email author
  • X. Alexi
    • 2
  • E. van Werkhoven
    • 3
  • L. Madlensky
    • 4
  • L. Natarajan
    • 4
  • S. W. Flatt
    • 4
  • W. Zwart
    • 2
  • S. C. Linn
    • 2
    • 5
  • B. A. Parker
    • 4
  • A. H. B. Wu
    • 6
  • J. P. Pierce
    • 4
  • A. D. R. Huitema
    • 1
    • 7
  • J. H. Beijnen
    • 1
    • 8
  1. 1.Department of Pharmacy and PharmacologyAntoni van Leeuwenhoek – The Netherlands Cancer Institute and MC SlotervaartAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Division of Molecular PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of BiometricsAntoni van Leeuwenhoek – The Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Moores Cancer CenterUniversity of California San DiegoSan DiegoUSA
  5. 5.Department of PathologyUniversity Medical CenterUtrechtThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Laboratory MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  7. 7.Department of Clinical PharmacyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  8. 8.Science Faculty, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical PharmacologyUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations