Ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery for early-stage palpable and nonpalpable invasive breast cancer: decreased excision volume at unchanged tumor-free resection margin
- 323 Downloads
Ultrasound guidance (USG) during breast-conserving surgery improves tumor-free surgical resection margins. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether USG reduces resection volumes without compromising margin status. 134 patients with palpable or nonpalpable T1–2N0–1 invasive breast cancer were treated with USG and compared with a historical reference control group (CON) consisting of palpation-guided (PAG) or wire-guided localization (WIG) breast-conserving surgery. Primary outcomes were excess resection volume and clear margin status, and secondary outcome was re-excision rate. 66 patients underwent USG. In the CON group (n = 68), PAG was performed in 24 (35 %) and WIG in 44 (64 %) patients. Median excision volume [39 (IQR 20–66) vs 56 (38–94) cm3; p = 0.001] and median calculated resection ratio [1.7 (1.0–2.9) vs 2.8 (1.4–4.6) (p = 0.005)] were significantly smaller in the USG than in the CON group. Median minimal distance to the resection margin [4 mm (IQR 2–5 mm) vs 2 mm (1–4 mm), p = 0.004] was significantly larger. Clear resection margins were achieved in 58 of the USG patients (88 %) and in 58 of the CON patients (86 %) (p = 0.91); this was true in patients with palpable as well as nonpalpable lesions. Reexcision was needed in 6.1 and 7.2 % respectively. Relative risk for re-excision in the USG group was 0.82 (95 % CI 0.23–2.93). In patients with palpable and nonpalpable breast cancers, USG allows for lower excision volume and reduced resection of healthy breast tissue, without increased re-excision rate.
KeywordsBreast cancer Breast-conserving surgery Ultrasound
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 5.Haloua MH, Volders JH, Krekel NM, Lopes Cardozo AM, de Roos WK, de Widt-Levert LM, van der Veen H, Rijna H, Bergers E, Jóźwiak K, Meijer S, van den Tol P (2016) Intraoperative ultrasound guidance in breast-conserving surgery improves cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (COBALT). Ann Surg Oncol 23(1):30–37Google Scholar
- 6.National Breast Cancer Organization of the Netherlands. Guideline breast cancer. http://www.oncoline.nl. Accessed 4 Jan 2013
- 8.Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A, Hoogenraad WJ, Horiot JH, Jager JJ, Pierart M, Poortmans PM, Struikmans H, Maat B, Van Limbergen E, Bartelink H (2000) The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC ‘boost vs no boost’ trial. EORTC radiotherapy and breast cancer cooperative groups. Radiother Oncol 55(3):219–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Pleijhuis RG, Graafland M, de Vries J, Bart J, de Jong JS, van Dam GM (2009) Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: current modalities and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol 16(10):2717–2730CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Barentsz MW, van Dalen T, Gobardhan PD, Bongers V, Perre CI, Pijnappel RM, van den Bosch MA, Verkooijen HM (2012) Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for excision of non-palpable invasive breast cancer: a hospital-based series and an overview of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 135(1):209–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Krekel NM, Haloua MH, Lopes Cardozo AM, de Wit RH, Bosch AM, de Widt-Levert LM, Muller S, van der Veen H, Bergers E, de Lange de Klerk ES, Meijer S, van den Tol SMP (2013) Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for palpable breast cancer excision (COBALT trial): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 14(1):48–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Kombar OR, Fahmy DM, Brown MV, Farouk O, El-Damshety O (2012) Sonomammographic characteristics of invasive lobular carcinoma. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 30(4):115–124Google Scholar