Advertisement

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 153, Issue 3, pp 689–698 | Cite as

Identifying patterns of breast cancer care provided at high-volume hospitals: a classification and regression tree analysis

  • Amanda L. KongEmail author
  • Liliana E. Pezzin
  • Ann B. Nattinger
Epidemiology

Abstract

There is a growing body of literature linking hospital volume to outcomes in breast cancer. However, the mechanism through which volume influences outcome is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between hospital volume of breast cancer cases and patterns of processes of care in a population-based cohort of Medicare patients. A previously described and validated algorithm was applied to Medicare claims for newly diagnosed breast cancer cases in 2003 to identify potential subjects. Breast cancer patients were recruited to participate in a survey study examining breast cancer outcomes, and data were merged with Medicare claims and state tumor registries. Hospital volume was divided into tertiles. A Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model was performed to look for statistically significant relationships between patterns of processes of care and hospital volume. Using CART analysis, eight patterns of care were identified that differentiated breast cancer care at high- versus low-volume hospitals. Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) was the single process of care that demonstrated the greatest differentiation across hospitals with differing volumes. Four patterns of care significantly predicted that a patient was less likely to be treated at a high-volume hospital. Our study demonstrates differences in patterns of processes of care between low- and high-volume hospitals. Hospital volume was associated with several patterns of care that reflect the most current standards of care, particularly SLND. Greater adoption of these patterns by low-volume hospitals could improve the overall quality of care for breast cancer.

Keywords

Breast Cancer Hospital Volume Processes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the NIH-NCI under grant RO1-CA81379 to Dr. Nattinger.The study sponsors had no involvement in the study design, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

IRB approval was obtained and informed consent was obtained from human subjects for this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR (2002) Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 137:511–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE (2000) Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol 18:2327–2340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mikeljevic JS, Haward RA, Johnston C, Sainsbury R, Forman D (2003) Surgeon workload and survival from breast cancer. Br J Cancer 89:487–491PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sainsbury R, Haward B, Rider L, Johnston C, Round C (1995) Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer. Lancet 345:1265–1270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Skinner KA, Helsper JT, Deapen D, Ye W, Sposto R (2003) Breast cancer: do specialists make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol 10:606–615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen CS, Liu TC, Lin HC, Lien YC (2008) Does high surgeon and hospital surgical volume raise the five-year survival rate for breast cancer? A population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 110:349–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Allgood PC, Bachmann MO (2006) Effects of specialisation on treatment and outcomes in screen-detected breast cancers in Wales: cohort study. Br J Cancer 94:36–42PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harcourt KF, Hicks KL (2003) Is there a relationship between case volume and survival in breast cancer? Am J Surg 185:407–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gilligan MA, Neuner J, Zhang X, Sparapani R, Laud PW, Nattinger AB (2007) Relationship between number of breast cancer operations performed and 5-year survival after treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Am J Public Health 97:539–544PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simunovic M, Rempel E, Theriault ME et al (2006) Influence of hospital characteristics on operative death and survival of patients after major cancer surgery in Ontario. Can J Surg 49:251–258PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hebert-Croteau N, Brisson J, Latreille J, Blanchette C, Deschenes L (1999) Variations in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer in Quebec between 1988 and 1994. CMAJ 161:951–955PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hebert-Croteau N, Brisson J, Lemaire J, Latreille J, Pineault R (2005) Investigating the correlation between hospital of primary treatment and the survival of women with breast cancer. Cancer 104:1343–1348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gutierrez JC, Hurley JD, Housri N, Perez EA, Byrne MM, Koniaris LG (2008) Are many community hospitals undertreating breast cancer?: lessons from 24,834 patients. Ann Surg 248:154–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guller U, Safford S, Pietrobon R, Heberer M, Oertli D, Jain NB (2005) High hospital volume is associated with better outcomes for breast cancer surgery: analysis of 233,247 patients. World J Surg 29:994–999 (discussion 9-1000)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosato R, Sacerdote C, Pagano E et al (2009) Appropriateness of early breast cancer management in relation to patient and hospital characteristics: a population based study in Northern Italy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:349–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bailie K, Dobie I, Kirk S, Donnelly M (2007) Survival after breast cancer treatment: the impact of provider volume. J Eval Clin Pract 13:749–757CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roohan PJ, Bickell NA, Baptiste MS, Therriault GD, Ferrara EP, Siu AL (1998) Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. Am J Public Health 88:454–457PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nomura E, Tsukuma H, Ajiki W, Ishikawa O, Oshima A (2006) Population-based study of the relationship between hospital surgical volume and 10-year survival of breast cancer patients in Osaka, Japan. Cancer Sci 97:618–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Birkmeyer NJ, Goodney PP, Stukel TA, Hillner BE, Birkmeyer JD (2005) Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes? Cancer 103:435–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gillis CR, Hole DJ (1996) Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland. BMJ 312:145–148PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kingsmore D, Hole D, Gillis C (2004) Why does specialist treatment of breast cancer improve survival? The role of surgical management. Br J Cancer 90:1920–1925PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Richards MA, Wolfe CD, Tilling K, Barton J, Bourne HM, Gregory WM (1996) Variations in the management and survival of women under 50 years with breast cancer in the South East Thames region. Br J Cancer 73:751–757PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chaudhry R, Goel V, Sawka C (2001) Breast cancer survival by teaching status of the initial treating hospital. CMAJ 164:183–188PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Neuner JM, Gilligan MA, Sparapani R, Laud PW, Haggstrom D, Nattinger AB (2004) Decentralization of breast cancer surgery in the United States. Cancer 101:1323–1329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nattinger AB, Laud PW, Bajorunaite R, Sparapani RA, Freeman JL (2004) An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer. Health Serv Res 39:1733–1749PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nattinger AB, Pezzin LE, Sparapani RA, Neuner JM, King TK, Laud PW (2010) Heightened attention to medical privacy: challenges for unbiased sample recruitment and a possible solution. Am J Epidemiol 172:637–644PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nattinger AB, Laud PW, Sparapani RA, Zhang X, Neuner JM, Gilligan MA (2007) Exploring the surgeon volume outcome relationship among women with breast cancer. Arch Intern Med 167:1958–1963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Results SEaE. Available at http://seer.cancer.gov/tools/ssm/. (Accessed 31 Oct 2014
  29. 29.
    Kong AL, Yen TW, Pezzin LE et al (2011) Socioeconomic and racial differences in treatment for breast cancer at a low-volume hospital. Ann Surg Oncol 18:3220–3227PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, MontereyGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Howell A, Cuzick J, Baum M et al (2005) Results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial after completion of 5 years’ adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Lancet 365:60–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee-Feldstein A, Anton-Culver H, Feldstein PJ (1994) Treatment differences and other prognostic factors related to breast cancer survival. Delivery systems and medical outcomes. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 271:1163–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fedeli U, Alba N, Schievano E et al (2007) Diffusion of good practices of care and decline of the association with case volume: the example of breast conserving surgery. BMC Health Serv Res 7:167PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Darby S, McGale P, Correa C et al (2011) Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 378:1707–1716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    McGale P, Taylor C, Correa C et al (2014) Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet 383:2127–2135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cuzick J, Sestak I, Baum M et al (2010) Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial. Lancet Oncol 11:1135–1141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fisher B, Jeong JH, Bryant J et al (2004) Treatment of lymph-node-negative, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: long-term findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomised clinical trials. Lancet 364:858–868CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McLaughlin SA, Wright MJ, Morris KT et al (2008) Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: objective measurements. J Clin Oncol 26:5213–5219PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vrijens F, Stordeur S, Beirens K, Devriese S, Van Eycken E, Vlayen J (2012) Effect of hospital volume on processes of care and 5-year survival after breast cancer: a population-based study on 25000 women. Breast 21:261–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chien CR, Pan IW, Tsai YW et al (2012) Radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery: does hospital surgical volume matter? A population-based study in Taiwan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:43–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Basu J (2005) Severity of illness, race, and choice of local versus distant hospitals among the elderly. J Health Care Poor Underserved 16:391–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bouche G, Migeot V, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Salamon R, Ingrand P (2008) Breast cancer surgery: do all patients want to go to high-volume hospitals? Surgery 143:699–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Morris E, Haward RA, Gilthorpe MS, Craigs C, Forman D (2008) The impact of the Calman-Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire’s breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 19:284–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    van Hoeve J, de Munck L, Otter R, de Vries J, Siesling S (2014) Quality improvement by implementing an integrated oncological care pathway for breast cancer patients. Breast 23:364–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
  46. 46.
    Yen TW, Laud PW, Sparapani RA, Nattinger AB (2014) Surgeon specialization and use of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. JAMA Surg 149:185–192PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda L. Kong
    • 1
    Email author
  • Liliana E. Pezzin
    • 2
  • Ann B. Nattinger
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of SurgeryMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medicine and Center for Patient Care and Outcomes ResearchMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations