Fat/water ratios measured with diffuse reflectance spectroscopy to detect breast tumor boundaries
- 528 Downloads
Recognition of the tumor during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) can be very difficult and currently a robust method of margin assessment for the surgical setting is not available. As a result, tumor-positive margins, which require additional treatment, are not found until histopathologic evaluation. With diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), tissue can be characterized during surgery based on optical parameters that are related to the tissue morphology and composition. Here we investigate which optical parameters are able to detect tumor in an area with a mixture of benign and tumor tissue and hence which parameters are most suitable for intra-operative margin assessment. DRS spectra (400–1600 nm) were obtained from 16 ex vivo lumpectomy specimens from benign, tumor border, and tumor tissue. One mastectomy specimen was used with a custom-made grid for validation purposes. The optical parameter related to the absorption of fat and water (F/W-ratio) in the extended near-infrared wavelength region (~1000–1600 nm) provided the best discrimination between benign and tumor sites resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100 % (excluding the border sites). Per patient, the scaled F/W-ratio gradually decreased from grossly benign tissue towards the tumor in 87.5 % of the specimens. In one test case, based on a predefined F/W-ratio for boundary tissue of 0.58, DRS produced a surgical resection plane that nearly overlapped with a 2-mm rim of benign tissue, 2 mm being the most widely accepted definition of a negative margin. The F/W-ratio provided excellent discrimination between sites clearly inside or outside the tumor and was able to detect the border of the tumor in one test case. This work shows the potential for DRS to guide the surgeon during BCS.
KeywordsDiffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) Resection margins Breast cancer Near-infra red (NIR)
We would like to thank the NKI pathology department for their help in the collection of the data as well as the Philips Research project members for their contribution. We also thank Jarich Spliethoff and Jasper Nijkamp for their valuable feedback. This work was supported by Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
This study was supported by Philips Research, Eindhoven, Netherlands. The authors who are affiliated with Philips Research only have financial interests in the subject matter, materials, and equipment, in the sense that they are an employee of Philips. None of the other authors have any financial relationship with Philips Research or conflict of interests.
This study complies with the current laws of the Netherlands.
- 3.Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, Recht A, Connolly J, Gelman R, Silver B, Hetelekidis S, Abner A, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ (2000) Outcome at 8 Years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol 18(8):1668–1675PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong J-H, Wolmark N (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1233–1241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, Legrand C, Sylvester RJ, Tong D, Van der Schueren E, Helle PA, Van Zijl K, Bartelink H (2000) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: european organization for research and treatment of cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(14):1143–1150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, Smith SL, Steinberg SM, Liewehr DJ, Menard C, Lippman ME, Lichter AS, Altemus RM (2003) Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy. Cancer 98:697–702. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11580 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Morrow M (2014) The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 21:717–730. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3480-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, Lawrence G, Kearins O, Pereira J, Sheppard C, Caddy CM, van der Meulen JHP (2012) Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ 345:e4505. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4505 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Sahin AA, Kuerer HM, Babiera GV, Singletary SE, Whitman GJ, Ross MI, Ames FC, Feig BW, Buchholz TA, Meric-Bernstam F (2007) Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 14(4):1458–1471. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9236-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Guiliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, Klimberg S, Chavez-MacGregor M, Freedman G, Houssami N, Johnson PL, Morrow M (2014) Society of surgical oncology—American Society for Radiation oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88(3):553–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Schnabel F, Boolbol SK, Gittleman M, Karni T, Tafra L, Feldman S, Police A, Friedman NB, Karlan S, Holmes D, Willey SC, Carmon M, Fernandez K, Akbari S, Harness J, Guerra L, Frazier T, Lane K, Simmons RM, Estabrook A, Allweis T (2014) A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of marginprobe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1589–1595. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3602-0 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Zhu C, Palmer GM, Breslin TM, Harter J, Ramanujam N (2006) Diagnosis of breast cancer using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: comparison of a monte carlo versus partial least squares analysis based feature extraction technique. Lasers Surg Med 38(7):714–724. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20356 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Brown JQ, Bydlon TM, Kennedy SA, Caldwell ML, Gallagher JE, Junker M, Wilke LG, Barry WT, Geradts J, Ramanujam N (2013) Optical spectral surveillance of breast tissue landscapes for detection of residual disease in breast tumor margins. PLoS ONE 8(7):e69906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069906 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Kennedy S, Geradts J, Bydlon T, Brown JQ, Gallagher J, Junker M, Barry W, Ramanujam N, Wilke L (2010) Optical breast cancer margin assessment: an observational study of the effects of tissue heterogeneity on optical contrast. Breast Cancer Res 12(6):R91. doi: 10.1186/bcr2770 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Evers DJ, Nachabe R, Vranken Peeters MJ, van der Hage JA, Oldenburg HS, Rutgers EJ, Lucassen GW, Hendriks BHW, Wesseling J, Ruers TJM (2013) Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: towards clinical application in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137(1):155–165. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2350-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Haka AS, Volynskaya Z, Gardecki JA, Nazemi J, Lyons J, Hicks D, Fitzmaurice M, Dasari RR, Crowe JP, Feldman SM (2006) In vivo margin assessment during partial mastectomy breast surgery using Raman spectroscopy. Cancer Res 66(6):3317–3322. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2815 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar