Advertisement

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 149, Issue 2, pp 417–424 | Cite as

Long-term clinical outcomes in women with breast pain in the absence of additional clinical findings: mammography remains indicated

  • Mitra Noroozian
  • Lauren F. Stein
  • Kara Gaetke-Udager
  • Mark A. Helvie
Preclinical study

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the long-term clinical outcomes of women with breast pain in the absence of additional symptoms or signs (isolated breast pain), and the utility of mammography in their work-up. IRB approved, HIPAA compliant study retrospectively reviewed 1,386 patients referred for breast imaging with ICD-9 code for breast pain between 1/1/2006 and 12/31/2007. Of these, 617 consecutive women (mean age, 49 years) with isolated breast pain, mammogram, and follow-up (mean, 51 months) constituted the study group. Clinical data, mammographic and sonographic BI-RADS assessments, and geographic relationship between the site of cancer and pain were evaluated. The frequency of malignancies and of specific benign outcomes, both at and subsequent to the time of presentation, was determined. Breast cancer and specific benign outcomes were diagnosed in the painful breast of 11/617 (1.8 %) and 63/617 (10.2 %) women, respectively. Majority of the cancers (9/11, 81.8 %) were diagnosed subsequent (5–52 months) to initial imaging evaluation, whereas the majority of benign outcomes (52/63, 82.5 %) were diagnosed at initial presentation. Diagnostic mammography at initial presentation had a negative predictive value of 99.8 % (95 % CI 99.1 %, 100 %), specificity of 98.5 % (95 % CI 97.2 %, 99.3 %), and sensitivity of 66.7 % (95 % CI 11.6 %, 94.5 %). Three cancers were subsequently diagnosed in the contralateral (non-painful) breast. Eleven of 14 (78.6 %) cancers were in the symptomatic breast, of which 9 (81.8 %) geographically corresponded to the same area of focal pain. Thus, infrequently,  breast cancer may clinically present as or be preceded by isolated breast pain and diagnostic mammography is useful for assessment.

Keywords

Breast pain Breast cancer Outcomes Mammogram 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Lubomir M. Hadjiyski, Ph.D. for statistical analysis and Lisa Robbins for article preparation.

Conflict of interest

Authors M. Noroozian, L.F. Stein, and K. Gaetke-Udager, have no conflict of interest. M.A. Helvie discloses a General Electric Healthcare Institutional Grant (an activity not associated with this work).

References

  1. 1.
    Barton MB, Elmore JG, Fletcher SW (1999) Breast symptoms among women enrolled in a health maintenance organization: frequency, evaluation, and outcome. Ann Intern Med 130(8):651–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith RL, Pruthi S, Fitzpatrick LA (2004) Evaluation and management of breast pain. Mayo Clin Proc 79(3):353–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Conry C (1994) Evaluation of a breast complaint: is it cancer? Am Fam Physician 49(2):445–450, 453–444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duijm LE, Guit GL, Hendriks JH, Zaat JO, Mali WP (1998) Value of breast imaging in women with painful breasts: observational follow up study. BMJ 317(7171):1492–1495PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leung JW, Kornguth PJ, Gotway MB (2002) Utility of targeted sonography in the evaluation of focal breast pain. J Ultrasound Med 21(5):521–526, quiz 528-529PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Preece PE, Baum M, Mansel RE, Webster DJ, Fortt RW, Gravelle IH, Hughes LE (1982) Importance of mastalgia in operable breast cancer. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 284(6325):1299–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tumyan L, Hoyt AC, Bassett LW (2005) Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain. Breast J 11(5):333–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.00018.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jumah KB, Obajimi MO, Darko R (2003) Women with painful breasts without palpable masses: do they really need a mammogram? Afr J Med Med Sci 32(4):387–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lumachi F, Ermani M, Brandes AA, Boccagni P, Polistina F, Basso SM, Favia G, D’Amico DF (2002) Breast complaints and risk of breast cancer. Population-based study of 2,879 self-selected women and long-term follow-up. Biomed Pharmacother 56(2):88–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leddy R, Irshad A, Zerwas E, Mayes N, Armeson K, Abid M, Cluver A, Campbell A, Ackerman S, Lewis M (2013) Role of breast ultrasound and mammography in evaluating patients presenting with focal breast pain in the absence of a palpable lump. Breast J 19(6):582–589. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12178 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mansel RE (2010) Management of Breast Pain. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK (eds) Diseases of the breast. 4th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer business Philadelphia 52–57Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, Feig SA, Jackson VP, Kopans DB, Linver MN, Mendelson EB, Moss LJ, Sickles EA (2003) American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®). Breast imaging atlas, 4th edn. American College of Radiology, RestonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Masroor I, Afzal S, Sakhawat S, Khan N, Beg MA, Kawal D (2009) Negative predictive value of mammography and sonography in mastalgia with negative physical findings. J Pak Med Assoc 59(9):598–601PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    American College of Radiology (ACR) (2011) American College of Radiology practice guidelines and technical standards: practice guidelines for performance of screening and diagnostic mammography. http://www.acr.org/guidelines. Accessed 20 Dec 2011
  15. 15.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2011) National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp Accessed 20 Dec 2011

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mitra Noroozian
    • 1
  • Lauren F. Stein
    • 2
  • Kara Gaetke-Udager
    • 1
  • Mark A. Helvie
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Michigan Health SystemAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyOakland University William Beaumont School of MedicineRoyal OakUSA

Personalised recommendations