Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 149, Issue 1, pp 109–119 | Cite as

Effects of the BEAT Cancer physical activity behavior change intervention on physical activity, aerobic fitness, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

  • Laura Q. Rogers
  • Kerry S. Courneya
  • Philip M. Anton
  • Patricia Hopkins-Price
  • Steven Verhulst
  • Sandra K. Vicari
  • Randall S. Robbs
  • Robert Mocharnuk
  • Edward McAuley
Clinical trial
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Most breast cancer survivors (BCS) are not meeting recommended physical activity guidelines. Here, we report the effects of the Better Exercise Adherence after Treatment for Cancer (BEAT Cancer) behavior change intervention on physical activity, aerobic fitness, and quality of life (QoL). We randomized 222 post-primary treatment BCS to the 3-month intervention (BEAT Cancer) or usual care (UC). BEAT Cancer combined supervised exercise, face-to-face counseling, and group discussions with tapering to home-based exercise. Assessments at baseline, immediately post-intervention (month 3; M3), and 3 months post-intervention (month 6; M6) included accelerometer and self-reported physical activity, submaximal treadmill test, and QoL [Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Breast scale]. Adjusted linear mixed-model analyses demonstrated significant effects of BEAT Cancer compared to UC on weekly minutes of ≥moderate intensity physical activity at M3 by accelerometer [mean between group difference (M) = +41; 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 10–73; p = 0.010] and self-report (M = +93; CI = 62–123; p < 0.001). Statistical significance remained at M6 for self-reported physical activity (M = +74; CI = 43–105; p < 0.001). BEAT Cancer participants were significantly more likely to meet physical activity recommendations at both time points [accelerometer M3 adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.2; CI = 1.0–4.8 and M6 adjusted OR = 2.4; CI = 1.1–5.3; self-report M3 adjusted OR = 5.2; CI = 2.6–10.4 and M6 adjusted OR = 4.8; CI = 2.3–10.0]. BEAT Cancer significantly improved fitness at M6 (M = +1.8 ml/kg/min; CI = 0.8–2.8; p = 0.001) and QoL at M3 and M6 (M = +6.4; CI = 3.1–9.7; p < 0.001 and M = +3.8; CI = 0.5–7.2; p = 0.025, respectively). The BEAT Cancer intervention significantly improved physical activity, fitness, and QoL with benefits continuing 3 months post-intervention.

Keywords

Oncology Survivorship Compliance Adherence Exercise 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions of Karen Hoelzer, MD, Sara Mansfield, MS, Amanda Fogleman, BS, Ruth Sosnoff, PhD, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine Center for Clinical Research, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign kinesiology graduate students and assistants, and the University of Alabama at Birmingham Physical Activity core. This project was supported by the National Cancer Institute R01CA136859. Kerry S. Courneya is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program.

Conflict of interests

No personal or professional relationships that may represent a potential conflict of interest exist for this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Speck RM, Courneya KS, Masse LC, Duval S, Schmitz KH (2010) An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv: Res Pract 4(2):87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibrahim EM, Al-Homaidh A (2011) Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis: meta-analysis of published studies. Med Oncol 28(3):753–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya KS, Schwartz AL, Bandera EV, Hamilton KK, Grant B, McCullough M et al (2012) Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin 62(4):243–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2103) Survivorship version 1.2013. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mason C, Alfano CM, Smith AW, Wang CY, Neuhouser ML, Duggan C, Bernstein L, Baumgartner KB, Baumgartner RN, Ballard-Barbash R et al (2013) Long-term physical activity trends in breast cancer survivors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22(6):1153–1161PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Courneya KS (2010) Efficacy, effectiveness, and behavior change trials in exercise research. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 7:81PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Basen-Engquist K, Taylor CL, Rosenblum C, Smith MA, Shinn EH, Greisinger A, Gregg X, Massey P, Valero V, Rivera E (2006) Randomized pilot test of a lifestyle physical activity intervention for breast cancer survivors. Patient Educ Couns 64(1–3):225–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bloom JR, Stewart SL, D’Onofrio CN, Luce J, Banks PJ (2008) Addressing the needs of young breast cancer survivors at the 5 year milestone: can a short-term, low intensity intervention produce change? J Cancer Surviv 2(3):190–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jones LW, Courneya KS, Fairey AS, Mackey JR (2004) Effects of an oncologist’s recommendation to exercise on self-reported exercise behavior in newly diagnosed breast cancer survivors: a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med 28(2):105–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pinto BM, Frierson GM, Rabin C, Trunzo JJ, Marcus BH (2005) Home-based physical activity intervention for breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 23(15):3577–3587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rogers LQ, Hopkins-Price P, Vicari S, Pamenter R, Courneya KS, Markwell S, Verhulst S, Hoelzer K, Naritoku C, Jones L et al (2009) A randomized trial to increase physical activity in breast cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(4):935–946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vallance JK, Courneya KS, Plotnikoff RC, Yasui Y, Mackey JR (2007) Randomized controlled trial of the effects of print materials and step pedometers on physical activity and quality of life in breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 25(17):2352–2359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim SH, Shin MS, Lee HS, Lee ES, Ro JS, Kang HS, Kim SW, Lee WH, Kim HS, Kim CJ et al (2011) Randomized pilot test of a simultaneous stage-matched exercise and diet intervention for breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 38(2):E97–E106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hatchett A, Hallam JS, Ford MA (2013) Evaluation of a social cognitive theory-based email intervention designed to influence the physical activity of survivors of breast cancer. Psychooncology 22(4):829–836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pinto BM, Papandonatos GD, Goldstein MG (2013) A randomized trial to promote physical activity among breast cancer patients. Health Psychol 32(6):616–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matthews CE, Wilcox S, Hanby CL, Der Ananian C, Heiney SP, Gebretsadik T, Shintani A (2007) Evaluation of a 12-week home-based walking intervention for breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 15(2):203–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ligibel JA, Meyerhardt J, Pierce JP, Najita J, Shockro L, Campbell N, Newman VA, Barbier L, Hacker E, Wood M et al (2012) Impact of a telephone-based physical activity intervention upon exercise behaviors and fitness in cancer survivors enrolled in a cooperative group setting. Breast Cancer Res Treat 132(1):205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rogers LQ, Hopkins-Price P, Vicari S, Markwell S, Pamenter R, Courneya KS, Hoelzer K, Naritoku C, Edson B, Jones L et al (2009) Physical activity and health outcomes three months after completing a physical activity behavior change intervention: persistent and delayed effects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(5):1410–1418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rogers LQ, McAuley E, Anton PM, Courneya KS, Vicari S, Hopkins-Price P, Verhulst S, Mocharnuk R, Hoelzer K (2012) Better exercise adherence after treatment for cancer (BEAT Cancer) study: rationale, design, and methods. Contemp Clin Trials 33(1):124–137PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rogers LQ, Courneya KS, Verhulst S, Markwell S, McAuley E (2008) Factors associated with exercise counseling and program preferences among breast cancer survivors. J Phys Act Health 5:688–705PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rogers LQ, Markwell SJ, Courneya KS, McAuley E, Verhulst S (2009) Exercise preference patterns, resources, and environment among rural breast cancer survivors. J Rural Health 25(4):388–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rogers LQ, Markwell SJ, Verhulst S, McAuley E, Courneya KS (2009) Rural breast cancer survivors: exercise preferences and their determinants. Psychooncology 18(4):412–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rogers LQ, Matevey C, Hopkins-Price P, Shah P, Dunnington G, Courneya KS (2004) Exploring social cognitive theory constructs for promoting exercise among breast cancer patients. Cancer Nurs 27(6):462–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rogers LQ, McAuley E, Courneya KS, Verhulst SJ (2008) Correlates of physical activity self-efficacy among breast cancer survivors. Am J Health Behav 32(6):594–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rogers LQ, Shah P, Dunnington G, Greive A, Shanmugham A, Dawson B, Courneya KS (2005) Social cognitive theory and physical activity during breast cancer treatment. Oncol Nurs Forum 32(4):807–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Groll DL, To T, Bombardier C, Wright JG (2005) The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome. J Clin Epidemiol 58(6):595–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J (1998) Calibration of the computer science and applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30(5):777–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Godin G, Jobin J, Bouillon J (1986) Assessment of leisure time exercise behavior by self-report: a concurrent validity study. Can J Public Health 77(5):359–362PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Godin G, Shephard RJ (1985) A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci 10(3):141–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jacobs DR Jr, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, Leon AS (1993) A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25(1):81–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    USDHHS (2008) 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. In. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Balady G, Berra KA, Golding LA, Gordon NF, Mahler DA, Myers JN, Sheldahl LM (2000) ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Casaburi R, Whipp BJ (1999) Principles of exercise testing and interpretation including pathophysiology and clinical applications, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, Deasy S, Cobleigh M, Shiomoto G (1997) Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol 15(3):974–986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Beasley JM, Kwan ML, Chen WY, Weltzien EK, Kroenke CH, Lu W, Nechuta SJ, Cadmus-Bertram L, Patterson RE, Sternfeld B et al (2012) Meeting the physical activity guidelines and survival after breast cancer: findings from the after breast cancer pooling project. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131(2):637–643PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pinto BM, Rabin C, Papandonatos GD, Frierson GM, Trunzo JJ, Marcus BH (2008) Maintenance of effects of a home-based physical activity program among breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 16(11):1279–1289PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yost KJ, Eton DT (2005) Combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches to determine minimally important differences: the FACIT experience. Eval Health Prof 28(2):172–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vallance JK, Courneya KS, Plotnikoff RC, Dinu I, Mackey JR (2008) Maintenance of physical activity in breast cancer survivors after a randomized trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40(1):173–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Loprinzi PD, Lee H, Cardinal BJ (2013) Objectively measured physical activity among US cancer survivors: considerations by weight status. J Cancer Surviv 7(3):493–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rogers LQ, Fogleman A, Trammell R, Hopkins-Price P, Vicari S, Rao K, Edson B, Verhulst S, Courneya KS, Hoelzer K (2013) Effects of a physical activity behavior change intervention on inflammation and related health outcomes in breast cancer survivors: pilot randomized trial. Integr Cancer Ther 12(4):323–335PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Q. Rogers
    • 1
  • Kerry S. Courneya
    • 2
  • Philip M. Anton
    • 3
  • Patricia Hopkins-Price
    • 4
  • Steven Verhulst
    • 5
  • Sandra K. Vicari
    • 6
  • Randall S. Robbs
    • 5
  • Robert Mocharnuk
    • 4
  • Edward McAuley
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Nutrition SciencesUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of Physical Education and RecreationUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Department of KinesiologySouthern Illinois University CarbondaleCarbondaleUSA
  4. 4.Department of MedicineSouthern Illinois University School of MedicineSpringfieldUSA
  5. 5.Statistics and Research Informatics Core, Center for Clinical ResearchSouthern Illinois University School of MedicineSpringfieldUSA
  6. 6.Department of PsychiatrySouthern Illinois University School of MedicineSpringfieldUSA
  7. 7.Department of Kinesiology and Community HealthUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations