Premenopausal dietary fat in relation to pre- and post-menopausal breast cancer
- 729 Downloads
We examined the association between fat intake and breast cancer incidence in the Nurses’ Health Study II. We followed 88,804 women aged 26–45 years from 1991 to 2011 and documented incident breast cancers. Dietary fat, assessed by questionnaires in 1991, was examined in relation to total, premenopausal, and postmenopausal breast cancers. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate relative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). During 20 years of follow-up, 2,830 incident invasive breast cancer cases were diagnosed. Total fat intake was not associated with risk of breast cancer overall. After adjustment for demographic, anthropometric, lifestyle, and dietary factors, a positive association was observed between animal fat intake and breast cancer overall (RR for highest vs lowest quintile, 1.18; 95 % CI 1.04–1.33; P trend = 0.01). A positive association with animal fat intake was also seen among premenopausal women, but not among postmenopausal women. Higher intakes of saturated fat and monounsaturated fat were each associated with modestly higher breast cancer risk among all women, and higher cholesterol intake was associated with higher premenopausal breast cancer risk. However, the associations of saturated fat, monounsaturated fat and animal fat, were attenuated and non-significant after adjustment for red meat intake. Intakes of other types of fat including vegetable fat, dairy fat, polyunsaturated fat, and trans fat were not associated with breast cancer risk. Our finding suggests a positive association between early adult intake of animal fat and breast cancer risk.
KeywordsFat intake Animal fat Breast cancer
The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant (R01CA050385). The study sponsors were not involved in the study design and collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or the writing of the article or the decision to submit it for publication. The authors were independent from study sponsors. We would like to thank the participants and staff of the Nurses’ Health Study II, for their valuable contributions as well as the following state cancer registries for their help: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WY. In addition, this study was approved by the Connecticut Department of Public Health (DPH) Human Investigations Committee. Certain data used in this publication were obtained from the DPH. The authors’ responsibility were as follows: MSF, EC, WYC, AHE, and WCW: designed the research; MSF: analyzed and wrote the manuscript; and WCW: had primary responsibility for the final content of the manuscript; and all authors: provided critical input in the writing of the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript. The authors assume full responsibility for analyses and interpretation of these data.
Conflict of interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
- 1.Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D, Adami HO, Beeson WL, van den Brandt PA, Folsom AR, Fraser GE, Freudenheim JL, Goldbohm RA, Graham S, Kushi LH, Miller AB, Rohan TE, Speizer FE, Toniolo P, Willett WC, Wolk A, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Hunter DJ (2001) Types of dietary fat and breast cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. Int J Cancer 92:767–774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Thiébaut AC, Kipnis V, Chang SC, Subar AF, Thompson FE, Rosenberg PS, Hollenbeck AR, Leitzmann M, Schatzkin A (2007) Dietary fat and postmenopausal invasive breast cancer in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:451–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Sieri S, Krogh V, Ferrari P, Berrino F, Pala V, Thiébaut AC et al (2008) Dietary fat and breast cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 88:1304–1312Google Scholar
- 15.Wahner-Roedler DL, Nelson DF, Croghan IT, Achenbach SJ, Crowson CS, Hartmann LC, O’Fallon WM (2003) Risk of breast cancer and breast cancer characteristics in women treated with supradiaphragmatic radiation for Hodgkin lymphoma: Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc 78:708–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 14: Department of Agriculture ARS (2001)Google Scholar
- 17.Holland GWA, Unwin ID, Buss DH, Paul AA, Dat S (1991) The composition of foods: Cambridge UK: The Royal Society of Chemistry and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and FoodGoogle Scholar
- 18.Dial S (1995) Tocopherols and tocotrienols in key foods in the US diet. AOCS Press, Champaign, pp 327–342Google Scholar
- 20.Willett W, Lenart E (2013) Reproducibility and validity of food-frequency questionnaires. Nutritional epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 96–141Google Scholar
- 24.Lunn M, McNeil D (1995) Applying Cox regression to competing risks. Biometrics 51:524–532Google Scholar
- 25.Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Rimm E, Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Hennekens CH, Willett WC (1997) Dietary fat intake and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med 337:1491–1499 Google Scholar