Plasma enterolactone and breast cancer risk in the Nurses’ Health Study II
- 322 Downloads
Lignans are plant-based phytoestrogens with both estrogenic and anti-estrogenic properties that may be important for breast carcinogenesis. Retrospective studies have observed decreased breast cancer risk associated with high circulating enterolactone concentrations, a biomarker of lignan intake, but results from prospective studies are conflicting. To prospectively examine this association, we measured plasma enterolactone levels in 802 breast cancer cases and 802 matched controls nested among predominantly premenopausal women in the Nurses’ Health Study II cohort. We used conditional logistic regression and polytomous logistic regression models, adjusting for known breast cancer risk factors, to calculate relative risks (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Compared to women with enterolactone concentrations ≤4 nmol/L, the multivariate-adjusted RRs for breast cancer were 1.18 (95 % CI 0.86–1.62), 0.91 (95 % CI 0.66–1.25), and 0.96 (95 % CI 0.70–1.33) for women with enterolactone levels in the second to the fourth quartiles, respectively; P trend = 0.60. Results were similar across tumors defined by estrogen and progesterone receptor status. Among premenopausal women with follicular estradiol levels below the median (<47 pg/mL), women in the highest category of enterolactone levels had a 51 % lower breast cancer risk compared to those in the lowest category (95 % CI 0.27–0.91); P trend = 0.02. No association was observed among women with high-follicular estradiol levels (≥47 pg/mL), (comparable RR = 1.39, 95 % CI 0.73–2.65; P interaction = 0.02). We did not observe an overall association between plasma enterolactone and breast cancer risk in a large nested case–control study of US women. However, a significant inverse association was observed among premenopausal women with low-follicular estradiol levels, suggesting that enterolactone may be important in a low-estrogen environment. This should be confirmed in future studies.
KeywordsEnterolactone Lignan Breast cancer Biomarker Prospective study Premenopausal
This project was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 CA67272, R01 CA50385, and P30 CA71789. J.X. is supported by scholarships from Harvard University. M.S.R. is supported by the NIH T32 CA09001. The authors thank participants of the Nurses’ Health Study II for their longstanding contributions and support to this study. Laurie Custer, University of Hawai’i Cancer Center, is acknowledged for her skillful performance of the LCMS assay. The authors also thank the following state cancer registries for their help: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, and WY.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
- 2.Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer (1997). Lancet 350 (9084):1047–1059Google Scholar
- 4.Kaaks R, Berrino F, Key T, Rinaldi S, Dossus L, Biessy C, Secreto G, Amiano P, Bingham S, Boeing H, de Mesquita HBB, Chang-Claude J, Clavel-Chapelon F, Fournier A, van Gils CH, Gonzalez CA, Gurrea AB, Critselis E, Khaw KT, Krogh V, Lahmann PH, Nagel G, Olsen A, Onland-Moret NC, Overvad K, Palli D, Panico S, Peeters P, Quirós JR, Roddam A, Thiebaut A, Tjønneland A, Chirlaque MD, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Tumino R, Vineis P, Norat T, Ferrari P, Slimani N, Riboli E (2005) Serum sex steroids in premenopausal women and breast cancer risk within the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). J Natl Cancer Inst 97(10):755–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Horner NK, Kristal AR, Prunty J, Skor HE, Potter JD, Lampe JW (2002) Dietary determinants of plasma enterolactone. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 11(1):121–126Google Scholar
- 31.den Tonkelaar I, Keinan-Boker L, Van’t Veer P, Arts CJM, Adlercreutz H, Thijssen JHH, Peeters PHM (2001) Urinary phytoestrogens and postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10(3):223–228Google Scholar
- 37.Sonestedt E, Borgquist S, Ericson U, Gullberg B, Olsson H, Adlercreutz H, Landberg G, Wirfält E (2008) Enterolactone is differently associated with estrogen receptor β-negative and positive breast cancer in a Swedish nested case–control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(11):3241–3251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Grace PB, Taylor JI, Low Y-L, Luben RN, Mulligan AA, Botting NP, Dowsett M, Welch AA, Khaw K-T, Wareham NJ, Day NE, Bingham SA (2004) Phytoestrogen concentrations in serum and spot urine as biomarkers for dietary phytoestrogen intake and their relation to breast cancer risk in European prospective investigation of cancer and nutrition-norfolk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(5):698–708PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Kotsopoulos J, Tworoger SS, Campos H, Chung F-L, Clevenger CV, Franke AA, Mantzoros CS, Ricchiuti V, Willett WC, Hankinson SE, Eliassen AH (2010) Reproducibility of plasma, red blood cell, and urine biomarkers among premenopausal and postmenopausal women from the nurses’ health studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19(4):938–946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Aarestrup J, Kyrø C, Knudsen KEB, Weiderpass E, Christensen J, Kristensen M, Würtz AML, Johnsen NF, Overvad K, Tjønneland A, Olsen A (2012) Plasma enterolactone and incidence of endometrial cancer in a case-cohort study of Danish women. Br J Nutr, FirstView:1–7Google Scholar
- 51.Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Lundin E, Micheli A, Koenig KL, Lenner P, Muti P, Shore RE, Johansson I, Krogh V, Lukanova A, Stattin P, Afanasyeva Y, Rinaldi S, Arslan AA, Kaaks R, Berrino F, Hallmans G, Toniolo P, Adlercreutz H (2006) Circulating enterolactone and risk of endometrial cancer. Int J Cancer 119(10):2376–2381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Lin Y, Wolk A, Håkansson N, Peñalvo JL, Lagergren J, Adlercreutz H, Lu Y (2012) Validation of FFQ-based assessment of dietary lignans compared with serum enterolactone in Swedish women. Br J Nutr, FirstView:1–8Google Scholar
- 55.Travis RC, Spencer EA, Allen NE, Appleby PN, Roddam AW, Overvad K, Johnsen NF, Olsen A, Kaaks R, Linseisen J, Boeing H, Nothlings U, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Ros MM, Sacerdote C, Palli D, Tumino R, Berrino F, Trichopoulou A, Dilis V, Trichopoulos D, Chirlaque MD, Ardanaz E, Larranaga N, Gonzalez C, Suarez LR, Sanchez MJ, Bingham S, Khaw KT, Hallmans G, Stattin P, Rinaldi S, Slimani N, Jenab M, Riboli E, Key TJ (2009) Plasma phyto-oestrogens and prostate cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Br J Cancer 100(11):1817–1823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 59.Navarrete M, Maier C, Falzoni R, Quadros L, Lima G, Baracat E, Nazario A (2005) Assessment of the proliferative, apoptotic and cellular renovation indices of the human mammary epithelium during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Breast Cancer Res 7(3):R306–R313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar