Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 139, Issue 3, pp 863–872 | Cite as

A retrospective evaluation of chemotherapy dose intensity and supportive care for early-stage breast cancer in a curative setting

  • Gary H. Lyman
  • David C. Dale
  • Dianne Tomita
  • Sadie Whittaker
  • Jeffrey Crawford
Epidemiology

Abstract

Early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) is commonly treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy, and maintaining full-dose chemotherapy on the planned schedule is associated with improved patient outcome. Retrospective analysis of patients with ESBC treated from 1997 to 2000 showed that 56 % of patients received a relative dose intensity (RDI) <85 % (Lyman et al., J Clin Oncol 21(24):4524–4531, 2003). To determine current practice, we evaluated treatment patterns at 24 US community- and hospital-based oncology practices, 79 % of which participated in the previous study. Data were abstracted from medical records of 532 patients with surgically resected ESBC (stage I–IIIa) treated from 2007 to 2009, who were ≥18 years old and had completed ≥1 cycle of one of the following regimens: docetaxel + cyclophosphamide (TC); doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (AC); AC followed by paclitaxel (AC-T); docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab (TCH); or docetaxel + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (TAC). Endpoints included RDI, dose delays, dose reductions, grade 3/4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia (FN), FN-related hospitalization, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use, and antimicrobial use. In this study, TC was the most common chemotherapy regimen (42 %), and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens were more common relative to the previously published results (89 vs <4 %). Overall, 83.8 % of patients received an RDI ≥85 %, an improvement over the previous study where 44.5 % received an RDI ≥85 %. Other changes seen between this and the previous study included a lower incidence of dose delays (16 vs 25 %) and dose reductions (21 vs 37 %) and increased use of primary prophylactic G-CSF (76 vs ~3 %). Here, 40 % of patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia, 3 % had FN, 2 % had an FN-related hospitalization, and 30 % received antimicrobial therapy; these measures were not available in the previously published results. Though RDI was higher here than in the previous study, 16.2 % of patients still received an RDI <85 %. Understanding factors that contribute to reduced RDI may further improve chemotherapy delivery, and ultimately, patient outcomes.

Keywords

Relative dose intensity Chemotherapy Supportive care Breast cancer 

Supplementary material

10549_2013_2582_MOESM1_ESM.doc (122 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 123 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bonadonna G, Brusamolino E, Valagussa P, Rossi A, Brugnatelli L, Brambilla C, De Lena M, Tancini G, Bajetta E, Musumeci R, Veronesi U (1976) Combination chemotherapy as an adjuvant treatment in operable breast cancer. N Engl J Med 294(8):405–410. doi:10.1056/NEJM197602192940801 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rossi A, Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Veronesi U (1981) Multimodal treatment in operable breast cancer: five-year results of the CMF programme. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 282(6274):1427–1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    EBCTCG (2011) Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 379(9814):4–10Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fisher B, Brown AM, Dimitrov NV, Poisson R, Redmond C, Margolese RG, Bowman D, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Kardinal CG et al (1990) Two months of doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-15. J Clin Oncol 8(9):1483–1496PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, Wolmark N (2004) Treatment of axillary lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer: updated findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 96(24):1823–1831. doi:10.1093/jnci/djh338 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jones SE, Moon TE, Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Rivkin S, Buzdar A, Montague E, Powles T (1987) Comparison of different trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II breast cancer using a natural history data base. Am J Clin Oncol 10(5):387–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Pan HC, Clarke M, Cutter D, Darby S, McGale P, Taylor C, Wang YC, Bergh J, Di Leo A, Albain K, Swain S, Piccart M, Pritchard K (2012) Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 379(9814):432–444. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61625-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henderson IC, Berry DA, Demetri GD, Cirrincione CT, Goldstein LJ, Martino S, Ingle JN, Cooper MR, Hayes DF, Tkaczuk KH, Fleming G, Holland JF, Duggan DB, Carpenter JT, Frei E 3rd, Schilsky RL, Wood WC, Muss HB, Norton L (2003) Improved outcomes from adding sequential paclitaxel but not from escalating doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(6):976–983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin M, Pienkowski T, Mackey J, Pawlicki M, Guastalla JP, Weaver C, Tomiak E, Al-Tweigeri T, Chap L, Juhos E, Guevin R, Howell A, Fornander T, Hainsworth J, Coleman R, Vinholes J, Modiano M, Pinter T, Tang SC, Colwell B, Prady C, Provencher L, Walde D, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Hugh J, Loret C, Rupin M, Blitz S, Jacobs P, Murawsky M, Riva A, Vogel C (2005) Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 352(22):2302–2313. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043681 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones SE, Savin MA, Holmes FA, O’Shaughnessy JA, Blum JL, Vukelja S, McIntyre KJ, Pippen JE, Bordelon JH, Kirby R, Sandbach J, Hyman WJ, Khandelwal P, Negron AG, Richards DA, Anthony SP, Mennel RG, Boehm KA, Meyer WG, Asmar L (2006) Phase III trial comparing doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide with docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(34):5381–5387. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.06.5391 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer EP, Gradishar WJ, Davidson NE, Martino S, Livingston R, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Carpenter J, Hurd D, Holland JF, Smith BL, Sartor CI, Leung EH, Abrams J, Schilsky RL, Muss HB, Norton L (2003) Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 21(8):1431–1439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    EBCTCG (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365(9472):1687–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, Fryback DG, Clarke L, Zelen M, Mandelblatt JS, Yakovlev AY, Habbema JD, Feuer EJ (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353(17):1784–1792. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa050518 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DeSantis C, Siegel R, Bandi P, Jemal A (2011) Breast cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(6):409–418. doi:10.3322/caac.20134 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    American Cancer Society (2012) Cancer Facts and Figures 2012Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hryniuk WM, Figueredo A, Goodyear M (1987) Applications of dose intensity to problems in chemotherapy of breast and colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol 14(4 Suppl 4):3–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Budman DR, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT, Henderson IC, Wood WC, Weiss RB, Ferree CR, Muss HB, Green MR, Norton L, Frei E 3rd (1998) Dose and dose intensity as determinants of outcome in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(16):1205–1211. doi:10.1093/jnci/90.16.1205 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chirivella I, Bermejo B, Insa A, Perez-Fidalgo A, Magro A, Rosello S, Garcia-Garre E, Martin P, Bosch A, Lluch A (2009) Optimal delivery of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting improves outcome of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 114(3):479–484. doi:10.1007/s10549-008-0018-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lyman GH (2009) Impact of chemotherapy dose intensity on cancer patient outcomes. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 7(1):99–108Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lyman GH, Dale DC, Crawford J (2003) Incidence and predictors of low dose-intensity in adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy: a nationwide study of community practices. J Clin Oncol 21(24):4524–4531. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.05.002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Giordano SH, Lin YL, Kuo YF, Hortobagyi GN, Goodwin JS (2012) Decline in the use of anthracyclines for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(18):2232–2239. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1273 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer. v3.2013Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wildiers H, Reiser M (2011) Relative dose intensity of chemotherapy and its impact on outcomes in patients with early breast cancer or aggressive lymphoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 77(3):221–240. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.02.002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kemeny MM, Peterson BL, Kornblith AB, Muss HB, Wheeler J, Levine E, Bartlett N, Fleming G, Cohen HJ (2003) Barriers to clinical trial participation by older women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21(12):2268–2275. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.09.124 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Muss HB, Woolf S, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Weiss RB, Budman D, Wood WC, Henderson IC, Hudis C, Winer E, Cohen H, Wheeler J, Norton L (2005) Adjuvant chemotherapy in older and younger women with lymph node-positive breast cancer. JAMA 293(9):1073–1081. doi:10.1001/jama.293.9.1073 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Griggs JJ, Mangu PB, Anderson H, Balaban EP, Dignam JJ, Hryniuk WM, Morrison VA, Pini TM, Runowicz CD, Rosner GL, Shayne M, Sparreboom A, Sucheston LE, Lyman GH (2012) Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese adult patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 30(13):1553–1561. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.39.9436 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    (1985) Consensus conference. Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. JAMA 254(24):3461–3463Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eifel P, Axelson JA, Costa J, Crowley J, Curran WJ Jr, Deshler A, Fulton S, Hendricks CB, Kemeny M, Kornblith AB, Louis TA, Markman M, Mayer R, Roter D (2001) National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1–3, 2000. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(13):979–989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Neugut AI, Hillyer GC, Kushi LH, Lamerato L, Leoce N, Nathanson SD, Ambrosone CB, Bovbjerg DH, Mandelblatt JS, Magai C, Tsai WY, Jacobson JS, Hershman DL (2012) Noninitiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with localized breast cancer: the breast cancer quality of care study. J Clin Oncol 30(31):3800–3809. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.43.8168 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shen Y, Dong W, Feig BW, Ravdin P, Theriault RL, Giordano SH (2009) Patterns of treatment for early stage breast cancers at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1997 to 2004. Cancer 115(10):2041. doi:10.1002/cncr.24271 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jones S, Holmes FA, O’Shaughnessy J, Blum JL, Vukelja SJ, McIntyre KJ, Pippen JE, Bordelon JH, Kirby RL, Sandbach J, Hyman WJ, Richards DA, Mennel RG, Boehm KA, Meyer WG, Asmar L, Mackey D, Riedel S, Muss H, Savin MA (2009) Docetaxel with cyclophosphamide is associated with an overall survival benefit compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: 7-year follow-up of US Oncology Research Trial 9735. J Clin Oncol 27(8):1177–1183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chan A, Fu WH, Shih V, Coyuco JC, Tan SH, Ng R (2011) Impact of colony-stimulating factors to reduce febrile neutropenic events in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 19(4):497–504. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0843-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Soong D, Haj R, Leung MG, Myers R, Higgins B, Myers J, Rajagopal S (2009) High rate of febrile neutropenia in patients with operable breast cancer receiving docetaxel and cyclophosphamide. J Clin Oncol 27(26):e101–e102. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0508 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vandenberg T, Younus J, Al-Khayyat S (2010) Febrile neutropenia rates with adjuvant docetaxel and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in early breast cancer: discrepancy between published reports and community practice—a retrospective analysis. Curr Oncol 17(2):2–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA, Dal Lago L, Donnelly JP, Kearney N, Lyman GH, Pettengell R, Tjan-Heijnen VC, Walewski J, Weber DC, Zielinski C (2011) 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 47(1):8–32. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.10.013 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, Ozer H, Armitage JO, Balducci L, Bennett CL, Cantor SB, Crawford J, Cross SJ, Demetri G, Desch CE, Pizzo PA, Schiffer CA, Schwartzberg L, Somerfield MR, Somlo G, Wade JC, Wade JL, Winn RJ, Wozniak AJ, Wolff AC (2006) 2006 Update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 24(19):3187–3205. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4451 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Myeloid Growth Factors. v1.2012Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary H. Lyman
    • 1
  • David C. Dale
    • 2
  • Dianne Tomita
    • 3
  • Sadie Whittaker
    • 3
  • Jeffrey Crawford
    • 1
  1. 1.Duke Cancer Institute, Duke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.University of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Amgen Inc.Thousand OaksUSA

Personalised recommendations