HER3 status by immunohistochemistry is correlated with poor prognosis in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer patients
- 1.1k Downloads
Breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous malignancy. The triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) breast cancer subtypes are highly aggressive and are associated with a poor prognosis. The therapeutic targets for TNBC remain undefined, and many patients with the HER2 subtype acquire resistance to therapy after prolonged treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of HER3 expression in invasive breast carcinoma. We established matched tissue microarray (TMA) blocks and clinical data from 950 cases of invasive breast carcinoma with long-term clinical follow-up data (median 109.7 months). Using the TMAs, we characterized the expression of ER, PR, HER2, EGFR, and HER3 by immunohistochemistry. Each case was classified as one of four IHC-based subtypes based on the expression of hormonal receptor (HR) and HER2. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival of 950 patients were analyzed by subtype. In the TNBC subtype, the HER3(+) group showed poorer disease-free survival (DFS, P = 0.010) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.015) than the HER3(−) group. In the HER2 subtype, the HER3(+) group also showed poorer DFS (P = 0.022) and OS (P = 0.077) than the HER3(−) group. However, there was no difference in patients with HR-positive breast cancer. HER3 expression was associated with poor DFS in both the TNBC and HER2 subtypes and poor OS in the TNBC subtype. HER3 overexpression is an important prognostic marker in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer, and further study is needed to clarify the role of HER-3 targeted treatment.
KeywordsBreast cancer Hormone receptor HER2 HER3 Prognosis
This work was supported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health and Welfare Affairs, Republic of Korea (A092255) and in part by Samsung Biomedical Research Institute grant [GL1B32711].
Conflict of interest
- 2.Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V (2007) Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer registry. Cancer 109(9):1721–1728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Vogel CL, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, Gutheil JC, Harris LN, Fehrenbacher L, Slamon DJ, Murphy M, Novotny WF, Burchmore M et al (2002) Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20(3):719–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Wiseman SM, Makretsov N, Nielsen TO, Gilks B, Yorida E, Cheang M, Turbin D, Gelmon K, Huntsman DG (2005) Coexpression of the type 1 growth factor receptor family members HER-1, HER-2, and HER-3 has a synergistic negative prognostic effect on breast carcinoma survival. Cancer 103(9):1770–1777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Gori S, Sidoni A, Colozza M, Ferri I, Mameli MG, Fenocchio D, Stocchi L, Foglietta J, Ludovini V, Minenza E et al (2009) EGFR, pMAPK, pAkt and PTEN status by immunohistochemistry: correlation with clinical outcome in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab. Ann Oncol 20(4):648–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Garrett JT, Olivares MG, Rinehart C, Granja-Ingram ND, Sanchez V, Chakrabarty A, Dave B, Cook RS, Pao W, E E et al (2011) Transcriptional and posttranslational up-regulation of HER3 (ErbB3) compensates for inhibition of the HER2 tyrosine kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(12):5021–5026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Viale G, Rotmensz N, Maisonneuve P, Bottiglieri L, Montagna E, Luini A, Veronesi P, Intra M, Torrisi R, Cardillo A et al (2009) Invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast with the “triple-negative” phenotype: prognostic implications of EGFR immunoreactivity. Breast Cancer Res Treat 116(2):317–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Gutteridge E, Agrawal A, Nicholson R, Leung Cheung K, Robertson J, Gee J (2010) The effects of gefitinib in tamoxifen-resistant and hormone-insensitive breast cancer: a phase II study. Int J cancer J Int du cancer 126(8):1806–1816Google Scholar
- 36.Yano S, Wang W, Li Q, Matsumoto K, Sakurama H, Nakamura T, Ogino H, Kakiuchi S, Hanibuchi M, Nishioka Y et al (2008) Hepatocyte growth factor induces gefitinib resistance of lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutations. Cancer Res 68(22):9479–9487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Roman L, Tseng LM, Liu MC, Lluch A, Staroslawska E, de la Haba-Rodriguez J, Im SA et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 13(1):25–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar