Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 135, Issue 2, pp 549–553 | Cite as

Regular screening mammography before the diagnosis of breast cancer reduces black:white breast cancer differences and modifies negative biological prognostic factors

  • Paula Grabler
  • Danielle Dupuy
  • Jennifer Rai
  • Sean Bernstein
  • David Ansell
Clinical trial


Black women present with later stage breast cancers compared to white women, and their cancers are more likely to be larger, receptor negative, and undifferentiated. This study evaluated black:white differences in the stage and biology of breast cancer among women who had a screening mammogram at one of two Chicago academic medical centers within two years of the breast cancer diagnosis (regularly screened) and compared them to the black:white differences in the stage and biology of breast cancer in women who had not received mammographic screening within two years of a breast cancer diagnosis (irregularly screened.) There were no significant black:white differences in the proportion of early breast cancers (black = 74 %; white = 69 %, p = NS) in the regularly screened population or in the irregularly screened group (black = 60 %; white = 68 %, p = NS.) The regularly screened population received significantly more mammograms (58 % ≥4 mammograms) compared to the irregularly screened population (41 % ≥4 mammograms.) Black women in the regularly screened population were less likely than irregularly screened black women to have estrogen negative breast cancers (26 vs. 36 %, p < .05), progesterone negative breast cancers (35 vs. 46 %, p < .05), and poorly differentiated breast cancers (39 vs. 53 %, p < .05.) White women in the irregularly screened population also had worse prognostic factors than white women in the regularly screened population, though these were not statistically significant. Regular mammographic screening can contribute to the narrowing of black:white differences in presentation of breast cancer.


Breast cancer Disparity Mammography Receptors 


Conflict of interest



  1. 1.
    U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (1991) Healthy people 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2000) Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ (2009) Cancer statistics, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, vol. 59(4). Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 225–249Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hirschman J, Whitman S, Ansell D (2007) The black:white disparity in breast cancer mortality: the example of Chicago. Cancer Causes Control 18:323–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ansell D, Grabler P, Whitman S, Ferrans C et al (2009) A community effort to reduce the black/white breast cancer mortality disparity in Chicago. Cancer Causes Control 20(9):1681–1688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whitman S, Ansell D, Orsi J, Francois T (2010) The racial disparity in breast cancer mortality. J Community Health 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9346-2
  7. 7.
    Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA, Edwards BK (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2008. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda. (based on November 2010 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2011)
  8. 8.
    Li CI, Malone KE, Daling (2003) Differences in breast cancer stage, treatment, and survival by race and ethnicity. Arch Intern Med 163(1):49–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elledge RM, Clark GM, Chamness GC et al (1994) Tumor biologic factors and breast cancer prognosis among white, Hispanic, and black women in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1352–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elmore JG (1998) Breast cancer tumor characteristics in black and white women. Cancer 83:2509–2515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McBride R, Hershman D, Tsai WY, Jacobson JS, Grann V, Neugut AI (2007) Within-stage racial differences in tumor size and number of positive lymph nodes in women with breast cancer. Cancer 110:1201–1208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S et al. (2010) Potential biologic causes of the racial survival disparity in adjuvant trials of ER-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:15s (suppl; abstr 511)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dunn BK, Agurs-Collins T, Browne D et al (2010) Health disparities in breast cancer: biology meets socioeconomic status. Breast Cancer Res Treat 121:281–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Metropolitan Chicago Breast Cancer Task Force (2007) Improving quality and reducing disparities in breast cancer mortality in metropolitan Chicago. Accessed 17 Apr 2011
  15. 15.
    Elmore JG, Nakano CY, Linden HM, Reisch LM, Ayanian JZ, Larson EB (2005) Racial inequities in the timing of breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and initiation of treatment. Med Care 43:141–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Lurie N, Abraham L, Barbash RB, Strzelczyk J et al (2006) Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer? Ann Intern Med 144:541–553PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    American College of Radiology (ACR) (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data systems (BI-RADS), 4th edn. American College of Radiology, RestonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Andaya AA, Enewold L, Horner MJ, Jatoi I, Shriver CD, Zhu K (2012) Socioeconiomic disparities and breast cancer hormone receptor status. Cancer Causes Control 23:951–958PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Narod SA, Dube MP (2001) Re: biological characterisitics of interval and screen-detected breast cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:151–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Metropolitan Chicago Breast Cancer Taskforce (2010) Annual report back to the community.; Accessed 17 Apr 2011
  21. 21.
    Brawley O (2002) Disaggregating the effects of race and poverty on breast cancer outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(7):471–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula Grabler
    • 1
  • Danielle Dupuy
    • 2
  • Jennifer Rai
    • 3
  • Sean Bernstein
    • 4
  • David Ansell
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Feinberg College of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Metropolitan Chicago Breast Cancer TaskforceChicagoUSA
  3. 3.University of Michigan College of MedicineAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.Department of Internal MedicineRush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations