Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 135, Issue 3, pp 629–637

Recommendations for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment

  • Maria João Cardoso
  • Jaime Santos Cardoso
  • Conny Vrieling
  • Douglas Macmillan
  • Dick Rainsbury
  • Joerg Heil
  • Eric Hau
  • Mohammed Keshtgar
Review

DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-1978-8

Cite this article as:
Cardoso, M.J., Cardoso, J.S., Vrieling, C. et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2012) 135: 629. doi:10.1007/s10549-012-1978-8

Abstract

During the Turning Subjective Into Objective seminar held in Lisbon in May 2011, experts in the topic gathered to discuss the unsolved problems of aesthetic evaluation of breast-conserving treatment (BCT). The purpose of this study is to review the main methodological issues related to the aesthetic evaluation of BCT, to discuss currently used methods of evaluation and the lack of a gold standard, and to write a set of recommendations that can be used as guidance for the aesthetic evaluation of BCT.

Keywords

Breast cancer conservative treatment Assessment Aesthetic results Recommendations 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria João Cardoso
    • 1
  • Jaime Santos Cardoso
    • 2
  • Conny Vrieling
    • 3
  • Douglas Macmillan
    • 4
  • Dick Rainsbury
    • 5
  • Joerg Heil
    • 6
  • Eric Hau
    • 7
  • Mohammed Keshtgar
    • 8
  1. 1.Breast UnitChampalimaud Cancer CentreLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.INESC Porto Breast Research Group, Faculdade de EngenhariaUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Centre de Radio-oncologie des Eaux-VivesGeneveSwitzerland
  4. 4.Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham City HospitalNottinghamUK
  5. 5.Winchester and Andover Breast UnitWinchesterUK
  6. 6.Breast UnitUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  7. 7.Cancer Care CentreSt. George HospitalSidneyAustralia
  8. 8.Royal Free Hospital and University College London (UCL)LondonUK

Personalised recommendations