Phase I–II study of vorinostat plus paclitaxel and bevacizumab in metastatic breast cancer: evidence for vorinostat-induced tubulin acetylation and Hsp90 inhibition in vivo
- 546 Downloads
In preclinical models, the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat sensitizes breast cancer cells to tubulin-polymerizing agents and to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-directed therapies. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of vorinostat plus paclitaxel and bevacizumab as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and the biological effects of vorinostat in vivo. For this purpose of this study, 54 patients with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy for MBC received vorinostat (200 or 300 mg PO BID) on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17, plus paclitaxel (90 mg/m2) on days 2, 9, 16, and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) on days 2 and 16 every 28 days. The primary objective of the phase I study was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of vorinostat, and for the phase II to detect an improvement of response rate from 40 to 60% (alpha = 0.10, beta = 0.10). No dose limiting toxicities were observed, and the RPTD of vorinostat was 300 mg BID. For the primary efficacy analysis in 44 patients at the RPTD, we observed 24 objective responses (55%, 95% confidence intervals (C.I) 39%, 70%). The adverse event profile was consistent with paclitaxel–bevacizumab, with the exception of increased diarrhea with the addition of vorinostat. Analysis of serial tumor biopsies in seven patients showed increased acetylation of Hsp90 and α-tubulin following vorinostat. Vorinostat induces histone and alpha tubulin acetylation and functional inhibition of Hsp90 in breast cancer in vivo and can be safely combined with paclitaxel and bevacizumab.
KeywordsMetastatic breast cancer Paclitaxel Bevacizumab Vorinostat HDAC inhibitors
This study was supported by United States Department of Health and Human Service contract N01-CM-62204 (P.I. Joseph A. Sparano, MD) and N01-CM-62207 (PI: Miguel Villalona, MD), and N01 CM62205 (PI: Charles Erlichman MD).
The authors have no relevant disclosures except Dr. Vered Stearns who has received research funding from Merck.
- 2.Fuino LBP, Wittman S et al (2003) Histone deacetylse inhibitor LAQ824 down regulated Her-2 and sensitizes human breast cancer cells to trastuzumab, taxotere, gemcitabine, and epothilone. B Mol Cancer Ther 2:971–984Google Scholar
- 6.Marcus AI, Zhou J, O’Brate A, Hamel E, Wong J, Nivens M, El-Naggar A, Yao TP, Khuri FR, Giannakakou P (2005) The synergistic combination of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor lonafarnib and paclitaxel enhances tubulin acetylation and requires a functional tubulin deacetylase. Cancer Res 65(9):3883–3893PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Duvic M, Talpur R, Ni X, Zhang C, Hazarika P, Kelly C, Chiao JH, Reilly JF, Ricker JL, Richon VM et al (2007) Phase 2 trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) for refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) [erratum appears in Blood 2007 Jun 15;109(12):5086] Blood 109(1):31–39Google Scholar
- 12.Fiskus W, Ren Y, Mohapatra A, Bali P, Mandawat A, Rao R, Herger B, Yang Y, Atadja P, Wu J (2007) Hydroxamic acid analogue histone deacetylase inhibitors attenuate estrogen receptor-alpha levels and transcriptional activity: a result of hyperacetylation and inhibition of chaperone function of heat shock protein 90. Clin Cancer Res 13(16):4882–4890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Miller KD, Wang M, Gralow J et al (2005) E2100: a randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel versus paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, Late breaking sessionGoogle Scholar
- 18.Ree AH, Dueland S, Folkvord S, Hole KH, Seierstad T, Johansen M, Abrahamsen TW, Flatmark K (2010) Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, combined with pelvic palliative radiotherapy for gastrointestinal carcinoma: the pelvic radiation and vorinostat (PRAVO) phase 1 study. Lancet Oncol 11(5):459–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Ramalingam SS, Maitland ML, Frankel P, Argiris AE, Koczywas M, Gitlitz B, Thomas S, Espinoza-Delgado I, Vokes EE, Gandara DR et al (2010) Carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with either vorinostat or placebo for first-line therapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(1):56–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.NCT00473889: A phase II/III randomized, double-blind study of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in combination with vorinostat or placebo in patients with stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) or stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). clinicaltrials.govGoogle Scholar