Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 132, Issue 2, pp 701–710

Multilevel determinants of breast cancer survival: association with geographic remoteness and area-level socioeconomic disadvantage

  • Paramita Dasgupta
  • Peter D. Baade
  • Joanne F. Aitken
  • Gavin Turrell
Epidemiology

Abstract

A major priority for cancer control agencies is to reduce geographical inequalities in cancer outcomes. While the poorer breast cancer survival among socioeconomically disadvantaged women is well established, few studies have looked at the independent contribution that area- and individual-level factors make to breast cancer survival. Here, we examine relationships between geographic remoteness, area-level socioeconomic disadvantage and breast cancer survival after adjustment for patients’ socio-demographic characteristics and stage at diagnosis. Multilevel logistic regression and Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation were used to analyze 18,568 breast cancer cases extracted from the Queensland Cancer Registry for women aged 30–70 years diagnosed between 1997 and 2006 from 478 Statistical Local Areas in Queensland, Australia. Independent of individual-level factors, area-level disadvantage was associated with breast cancer survival (P = 0.032). Compared to women in the least disadvantaged quintile (quintile 5), women diagnosed while resident in one of the remaining four quintiles had significantly worse survival (OR 1.23, 1.27, 1.30, 1.37 for quintiles 4, 3, 2, and 1, respectively). Geographic remoteness was not related to lower survival after multivariable adjustment. There was no evidence that the impact of area-level disadvantage varied by geographic remoteness. At the individual-level, Indigenous status, blue collar occupations and advanced disease were important predictors of poorer survival. A woman’s survival after a diagnosis of breast cancer depends on the socio-economic characteristics of the area where she lives, independently of her individual-level characteristics. It is crucial that the underlying reasons for these inequalities be identified to appropriately target policies, resources and effective intervention strategies.

Keywords

Breast cancer Survival inequalities Multilevel modeling Socio-economic Epidemiology 

References

  1. 1.
    Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM (2010) GLOBOCAN 2008: cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. IARC http://globocan.iarc.fr/. Accessed 05 Mar 2011
  2. 2.
    NBOCC, AIHW (2009) Breast Cancer in Australia: An overview, 2009. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre. AIHW Cancer Series no. 50. Cat no. CAN 46, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tracey E, Roder D, Zorbas H, Villanueva E, Jelfs P, Bishop J (2008) Survival and degree of spread for female breast cancers in New South Wales from 1980 to 2003: implications for cancer control. Cancer Causes Control 19(10):1121–1130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Héry C, Ferlay J, Boniol M, Autier P (2008) Quantification of changes in breast cancer incidence and mortality since 1990 in 35 countries with Caucasian-majority populations. Ann Oncol 19(6):1187–1194. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn025 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H, Butler J, Rachet B, Maringe C, Nur U, Tracey E, Coory M, Hatcher J, McGahan CE, Turner D, Marrett L, Gjerstorff ML, Johannesen TB, Adolfsson J, Lambe M, Lawrence G, Meechan D, Morris EJ, Middleton R, Steward J, Richards MA (2011) Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International cancer benchmarking partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet 377(9760):127–138. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62231-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mitchell KJ, Fritschi L, Reid A, McEvoy SP, Ingram DM, Jamrozik K, Clayforth C, Byrne MJ (2006) Rural-urban differences in the presentation, management and survival of breast cancer in Western Australia. Breast 15(6):769–776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu XQ, O’Connell DL, Gibberd RW, Armstrong BK (2008) Assessing the impact of socio-economic status on cancer survival in New South Wales, Australia 1996–2001. Cancer Causes Control 19(10):1383–1390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Youlden DR, Cramb SM, Baade PD (2009) Current status of female breast cancer in Queensland 1982 to 2006. Viertel Centre for Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Council Queensland, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sprague BL, Trentham-Dietz A, Gangnon RE, Ramchandani R, Hampton JM, Robert SA, Remington PL, Newcomb PA (2011) Socioeconomic status and survival after an invasive breast cancer diagnosis. Cancer 117(7):1542–1551. doi:10.1002/cncr.25589 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aarts MJ, Voogd AC, Duijm LE, Coebergh JW, Louwman WJ (2011) Socioeconomic inequalities in attending the mass screening for breast cancer in the south of the Netherlands-associations with stage at diagnosis and survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 128(2):517–525. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1363-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bastiaannet E, de Craen AJ, Kuppen PJ, Aarts MJ, van der Geest LG, van de Velde CJ, Westendorp RG, Liefers GJ (2011) Socioeconomic differences in survival among breast cancer patients in the Netherlands not explained by tumor size. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127(3):721–727. doi:10.1007/s10549-010-1250-z PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu XQ (2009) Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer survival: relation to stage at diagnosis, treatment and race. BMC Cancer 9:364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harper S, Lynch J, Meersman SC, Breen N, Davis WW, Reichman MC (2009) Trends in area-socioeconomic and race-ethnic disparities in breast cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, screening, mortality, and survival among women ages 50 years and over (1987–2005). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(1):121–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Craft PS, Buckingham JM, Dahlstrom JE, Beckmann KR, Zhang YP, Stuart-Harris R, Jacob G, Roder D, Tait N (2010) Variation in the management of early breast cancer in rural and metropolitan centres: Implications for the organisation of rural cancer services. Breast 19(5):396–401. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2010.03.032 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bennett H, Marshall R, Campbell I, Lawrenson R (2007) Women with breast cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand: the effect of urban versus rural residence on stage at diagnosis and survival. N Z Med J 120(1266):U2831PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Groome PA, Schulze KM, Keller S, Mackillop WJ (2008) Demographic differences between cancer survivors and those who die quickly of their disease. Clin Oncol 20(8):647–656. doi:10.1016/j.clon.2008.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stewart CH (2010) Multilevel modelling of event history data: comparing methods appropriate for large datasets. University of Glasgow, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Merlo J, Ostergren PO, Broms K, Bjorck-Linne A, Liedholm H (2001) Survival after initial hospitalisation for heart failure: a multilevel analysis of patients in Swedish acute care hospitals. J Epidemiol Community Health 55(5):323–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schootman M, Jeffe DB, Lian M, Gillanders WE, Aft R (2009) The role of poverty rate and racial distribution in the geographic clustering of breast cancer survival among older women: a geographic and multilevel analysis. Am J Epidemiol 169(5):554–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morley KI, Milne RL, Giles GG, Southey MC, Apicella C, Hopper JL, Phillips KA (2010) Socio-economic status and survival from breast cancer for young, Australian, urban women. Aust N Z J Public Health 34(2):200–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baade PD, Turrell G, Aitken JF (2011) Geographic remoteness, area-level socioeconomic disadvantage, and advanced breast cancer: a cross-sectional multilevel study. J Epidemiol Community Health. Online first: 2 February 2011. doi:10.1136/jech.2010.114777
  22. 22.
    AIHW (2004) Rural, regional and remote health: a guide to remoteness classifications. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare AIHW Cat. No. PHE 53, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008) Census of population and housing: socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2006. ABS Cat. No. 2033.0.55.001. ABS, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Banerjee S, Wall MM, Carlin BP (2003) Frailty modeling for spatially correlated survival data, with application to infant mortality in Minnesota. Biostatistics 4(1):123–142. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/4.1.123 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yau KK (2001) Multilevel models for survival analysis with random effects. Biometrics 57(1):96–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Merlo J (2003) Multilevel analytical approaches in social epidemiology: measures of health variation compared with traditional measures of association. J Epidemiol Community Health 57(8):550–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Steele F (2005) Event history analysis: a national centre for research methods briefing paper. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, BristolGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Browne WJ (2009) MCMC Estimation in MLwin v2.1. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, BristolGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Meth) 64(4):583–639. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rasbash J, Steele F, Browne WJ, Goldstein H (2009) A Users Guide to MLwiN, v2.10. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, BristolGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eikemo TA, Bambra C, Judge K, Ringdal K (2008) Welfare state regimes and differences in self-perceived health in Europe: a multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med 66(11):2281–2295. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.022 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li B, Lingsma HF, Steyerberg EW, Lesaffre E (2011) Logistic random effects regression models: a comparison of statistical packages for binary and ordinal outcomes. BMC Med Res Methodol. Online first: 25 May 2011. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-77
  33. 33.
    Cramb SM, Mengersen KL, Baade PD (2011) Atlas of cancer in Queensland: geographical variation in incidence and survival, 1998 to 2007. Viertel Centre for Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Council Queensland, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ali AMG, Greenberg D, Wishart GC, Pharoah P (2011) Patient and tumour characteristics, management, and age-specific survival in women with breast cancer in the East of England. Br J Cancer 104(4):564–570. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.14 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Downing A, Prakash K, Gilthorpe MS, Mikeljevic JS, Forman D (2007) Socioeconomic background in relation to stage at diagnosis, treatment and survival in women with breast cancer. Br J Cancer 96(5):836–840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pálka I, Kelemen G, Ormándi K, Lázár G, Nyári T, Thurzó L, Kahán Z (2008) Tumor characteristics in screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers. Pathol Oncol Res 14(2):161–167. doi:10.1007/s12253-008-9010-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2009) BreastScreen Australia evaluation final report June 2009. Screening monograph No1/2009. AIHW, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lawrence G, Wallis M, Allgood P, Nagtegaal ID, Warwick J, Cafferty FH, Houssami N, Kearins O, Tappenden N, O’Sullivan E, Duffy SW (2009) Population estimates of survival in women with screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancer taking account of lead time and length bias. Breast Cancer Res Treat 116(1):179–185. doi:10.1007/s10549-008-0100-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Raine R, Wong W, Scholes S, Ashton C, Obichere A, Ambler G (2010) Social variations in access to hospital care for patients with colorectal, breast, and lung cancer between 1999 and 2006: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics. Br Med J. doi:10.1136/bmj.b5479
  40. 40.
    Vona-Davis L, Rose DP (2009) The influence of socioeconomic disparities on breast cancer tumor biology and prognosis: a review. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 18(6):883–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bharat A, Aft RL, Gao F, Margenthaler JA (2009) Patient and tumor characteristics associated with increased mortality in young women (≤40 years) with breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 100(3):248–251. doi:10.1002/jso.21268 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thompson B, Baade P, Coory M, Carriere P, Fritschi L (2008) Patterns of surgical treatment for women diagnosed with early breast cancer in Queensland. Ann Surg Oncol 15(2):443–451. doi:10.1245/s10434-007-9584-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    National Breast Cancer Centre (2001) Clinical practice guidelines for management of advanced breast cancer. Australian Government. NHMRC publication, New Zealand. http://www.nbocc.org.au/health-professionals/clinical-best-practice/breast-cancer. Accessed 05 Mar 2011
  44. 44.
    Kurian A, Carlson RL (2010) Principles of breast cancer therapy. Breast cancer epidemiology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cunningham J, Rumbold AR, Zhang X, Condon JR (2008) Incidence, aetiology, and outcomes of cancer in Indigenous peoples in Australia. Lancet Oncol 9(6):585–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chong A, Roder D (2010) Exploring differences in survival from cancer among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians: implications for health service delivery and research. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 11(4):953–961PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Byers TE, Wolf HJ, Bauer KR, Bolick-Aldrich S, Chen VW, Finch JL, Fulton JP, Schymura MJ, Shen T, Van Heest S, Yin X (2008) The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States: findings from the National program of cancer registries patterns of care study. Cancer 113(3):582–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    German RR, Fink AK, Heron M, Stewart SL, Johnson CJ, Finch JL, Yin D (2011) The accuracy of cancer mortality statistics based on death certificates in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol 35(2):126–131. doi:10.1016/j.canep.2010.09.005 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Australian Government Department Health & Ageing (2010) Delivering better cancer care. Australian Government Department Health & Ageing. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/yourhealth/publishing.nsf/Content/CA2575FD004C0485CA2576FE000579F8/$File/cancare.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2011
  50. 50.
    Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2008) Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/thecommission/finalreport/en/index.html. Accessed 05 Mar 2011

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paramita Dasgupta
    • 1
  • Peter D. Baade
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Joanne F. Aitken
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Gavin Turrell
    • 2
  1. 1.Viertel Centre for Research in Cancer ControlCancer Council QueenslandSpring Hill, BrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Public HealthQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.School of Population HealthUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  4. 4.Griffith Health InstituteGriffith UniversityGold CoastAustralia

Personalised recommendations