Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 131, Issue 2, pp 645–651

Prognostic impact of isolated tumor cells in breast cancer axillary nodes: single tumor cell(s) versus tumor cell cluster(s) and microanatomic location

  • Johanna H. Vestjens
  • Maaike de Boer
  • Paul J. van Diest
  • Carolien H. van Deurzen
  • Jos A. van Dijck
  • George F. Borm
  • Eddy M. Adang
  • Peter Bult
  • Vivianne C. Tjan-Heijnen
Epidemiology
  • 148 Downloads

Abstract

In breast cancer, it has been shown that pN0(i+) and pN1mi have a comparable negative impact on disease-free survival, compared with pN0. However, pN0(i+) is considered to be a heterogeneous group. We determined the effect of metastatic size and microanatomic location within the pN0(i+) group on breast cancer recurrence. We included all Dutch breast cancer patients diagnosed in 1998–2005 with favorable primary tumor characteristics and a final nodal status of pN0(i+). For this analysis, only patients without adjuvant systemic therapy were eligible (n = 513). Presence of single tumor cells versus cell clusters, metastatic size and microanatomic location were recorded. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Analyses were adjusted for age at diagnosis, tumor size, tumor grade, axillary treatment and hormone receptor status. The 5-year disease-free survival of patients with single tumor cell(s) (n = 93) was 78.6% and with tumor cell cluster(s) (n = 404) 77.1%. The hazard ratio for disease events was 1.05 (95% CI 0.63–1.76) for cell cluster(s) compared with single cell(s). In a Cox regression model, doubling of metastatic tumor size corresponded to a hazard ratio of 1.21 (95% CI 1.02–1.43). The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.90 (95% CI 0.54–1.50) for parenchymal (n = 112) versus sinusoidal location (n = 395). Single tumor cells bear similar prognostic information as small tumor cell clusters, even though results do suggest that within the pN0(i+) group, increasing size of nodal involvement is associated with reduced survival. Microanatomic location does not seem to have prognostic relevance.

Keywords

Nodal isolated tumor cells Breast cancer 

References

  1. 1.
    Cserni G, Amendoeira I, Apostolikas N et al (2003) Pathological work-up of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Review of current data to be considered for the formulation of guidelines. Eur J Cancer 39:1654–1667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Boer M, van Deurzen CHM, van Dijck JAAM et al (2009) Micrometastases or isolated tumor cells and the outcome of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 361:653–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Green FL, Page DL, Fleming ID (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. American Joint Commission on Cancer, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Deurzen CHM, Bult P, de Boer M et al (2009) Morphometry of isolated tumor cells in breast cancer sentinel lymph nodes: metastases or displacement? Am J Pathol 33:106–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Deurzen CHM, de Bruin PC, Koelemij R et al (2009) Isolated tumor cells in breast cancer sentinel lymph nodes: displacement or metastases? An immunohistochemical study. Hum Pathol 40:778–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dewar DJ, Newell B, Green MA et al (2004) The microanatomic location of metastatic melanoma in sentinel lymph nodes predicts nonsentinel lymph node involvement. J Clin Oncol 22:3345–3349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reeves ME, Delgado R, Busam KJ et al (2003) Prediction of non-sentinel lymph node status in melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 10:27–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Startz H, Balda B-R, Kramer K-U et al (2001) A micromorphometry-based concept for routine classification of sentinel lymph node metastases and its clinical relevance for patients with melanoma. Cancer 91:1140–1151Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scolyer RA, Li L-XL, McCarthy SW et al (2004) Micromorphometric features of positive sentinel lymph nodes predict involvement of nonSNs in melanoma patients. Am J Clin Pathol 122:532–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Deurzen CHM, Seldenrijk CA, Koelemij R et al (2008) The microanatomic location of metastatic breast cancer in sentinel lymph nodes predicts nonsentinel lymph node involvement. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1309–1315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nasser IA, Lee AK, Bosari S et al (1993) Occult axillary lymph node metastases in “node-negative” breast carcinoma. Hum Pathol 24:950–957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Millis RR, Springall R, Lee AH et al (2002) Occult axillary lymph node metastases are of no prognostic significance in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 86:396–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reed W, Bohler PJ, Sandstad B et al (2004) Occult metastases in axillary lymph nodes as a predictor of survival in node-negative breast carcinoma with long-term follow-up. Breast J 10:174–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Querzoli P, Pedrial M, Rinaldi R et al (2006) Axillary lymph node nanometastases are prognostic factors for disease-free survival and metastatic relapse in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 12:6696–6701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tan LK, Giri D, Hummer AJ et al (2008) Occult axillary node metastases in breast cancer are prognostically significant: results in 368 node-negative patients with 20-year follow-up. J Clin Oncol 26:1803–1809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andersson Y, Frisell J, Sylvan M et al (2010) Breast cancer survival in relation to the metastatic tumor burden in axillary lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol 28:2868–2873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cox CE, Kiluk JV, Riker AI et al (2008) Significance of sentinel lymph node micrometastases in human breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 206:261–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hansen NM, Grube B, Ye X et al (2009) Impact of micrometastases in the sentinel node of patients with invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:4679–4684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Imoto S, Ochiai A, Okunura C et al (2006) Impact of isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes detected by immunochemical staining. Eur J Surg Oncol 32:1175–1179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leidenius MH, Vironen JH, Heikkila PS et al (2010) Influence of isolated tumor cells on outcome in small, node-negative (pT1N0M0) breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17:254–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maaskant AJG, van de Poll-Franse LV, Voogd AC et al (2009) Stage migration due to introduction of the sentinel node procedure: a population based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 113:173–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Montagna E, Viale G, Rotmensz N et al (2009) Minimal axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer has different prognostic implications according to the staging procedure. Breast Cancer Res Treat 118:385–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pugliese MS, Beatty JD, Tickman RJ et al (2009) Impact and outcomes of routine microstaging of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: significance of pN0(i+) and pN1mi categories. Ann Surg Oncol 16:113–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reed J, Rosman M, Verbanac KM et al (2009) Prognostic implications of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in sentinel nodes of patients with invasive breast cancer: 10-year analysis of patients enrolled in the prospective East Carolina University/Anne Arundel Medical Center Sentinel Node Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Surg 208:333–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weaver DL, Ashikaga T, Krag DN et al (2011) Effects of occult metastases on survival in node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 364:412–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Diaz LK, Wiley EL, Venta LA (1999) Are malignant cells displaced by large-gauge needle core biopsy of the breast? Am J Roentgenol 173:1303–1313Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hoorntje LE, Schipper MEI, Kaya A et al (2004) Tumour cell displacement after 14G breast biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:520–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Diaz NM, Cox CE, Ebert M et al (2004) Benign mechanical transport of breast epithelial cells to sentinel lymph nodes. Am J Surg Pathol 28:1641–1645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hansen NM, Ye X, Grube BJ et al (2004) Manipulation of the primary breast tumor and the incidence of SN metastases from invasive breast cancer. Arch Surg 139:634–640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bleiweiss IJ, Nagi CS, Jaffer S (2006) Axillary sentinel lymph nodes can be falsely positive due to iatrogenic displacement and transport of benign epithelial cells in patients with breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 24:2013–2018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carter BA, Jensen RA, Simpson JF et al (2000) Benign transport of breast epithelium into axillary lymph nodes after biopsy. Am J Clin Pathol 113:259–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maiorano E, Mazzarol GM, Pruneri G et al (2003) Ectopic breast tissue as a possible cause of false-positive axillary sentinel lymph node biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol 27:513–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xu X, Roberts SA, Pasha TL et al (2000) Undesirable cytokeratin immunoreactivity of native nonepithelial cells in sentinel lymph nodes from patients with breast carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:1310–1313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rao RS, Taylor J, Palmer J et al (2005) Breast cancer pseudometastasis in a sentinel lymph node with cytokeratin-positive debris. Breast J 11:134–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Borgstein PJ, Meijer S, Pijpers RJ et al (2000) Functional lymphatic anatomy for SN biopsy in breast cancer: echoes from the past and the periareolar blue method. Ann Surg 232:81–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Masci G, Di Tommasso L, Del Prato I et al (2010) Sinusal localization of nodal micrometastases is a prognostic factor in breast cancer. Ann Oncol 21:1228–1232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hartveit F, Lilleng PK (1996) Breast cancer: two micrometastatic variants in the axilla that differ in prognosis. Histopathology 28:241–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cserni G (2001) Sentinel lymph-node biopsy-based prediction of further breast cancer metastases in the axilla. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:532–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Di Tommasso L, Arizzi C, Rahal D et al (2006) Anatomic location of breast cancer micrometastasis in sentinel lymph node predicts axillary status. Ann Surg 243:706–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Li J, Rudas M, Kemmner W et al (2008) The location of small tumor deposits in the SLN predicts non-SLN macrometastases in breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:857–862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ragaz J, Olivotto IA, Spinelli JJ et al (2005) Locoregional radiation therapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: 20-year results of the British Colombia randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:116–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Overgaard M, Hansen PS, Overgaard J et al (1997) Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 337:949–955PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Overgaard M, Jensen MB, Overgaard J et al (1999) Postoperative radiotherapy in high risk postmenopausal breast cancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomised trial. Lancet 353:1641–1648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van ‘t Veer LJ et al (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1999–2009PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johanna H. Vestjens
    • 1
  • Maaike de Boer
    • 1
  • Paul J. van Diest
    • 3
  • Carolien H. van Deurzen
    • 3
  • Jos A. van Dijck
    • 2
  • George F. Borm
    • 2
  • Eddy M. Adang
    • 2
  • Peter Bult
    • 2
  • Vivianne C. Tjan-Heijnen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental BiologyMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Radboud University Nijmegen Medical CentreNijmegenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.University Medical Centre UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations