Second events following ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a register-based cohort study
- 355 Downloads
The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has increased in recent decades, particularly, in counties offering mammography screening. The aims of the present study are to examine factors that may predict subsequent breast malignancy amongst patients with DCIS, and to compare the incidence of the subsequent malignancy and mortality with that of the general population. This population-based study includes all primary cases of pure DCIS diagnosed in Norway in the period 1993 to 2007 (N = 3167). The patients were followed to subsequent malignancy (DCIS or invasive cancer) or death. Risk estimates within 10 years of follow-up were calculated using Kaplan–Meier methods adjusting for competing risks, Cox regression models and Standard Incidence and Mortality Ratios. Patients with DCIS had a 11.2% risk of being diagnosed with a subsequent breast malignancy within 10 years (9.4% for invasive cancer), implying that they were five times as likely to be diagnosed with breast malignancy as the general female population in Norway. The risk was dependent on the treatment of the DCIS; patients treated with mastectomy and breast-conserving treatment had a 3.8 and 9.8% risk of ipsilateral invasive cancer within 10 years, respectively. Breast cancer mortality was 2.5% within 10 years of follow-up, a fourfold risk compared with the general population. Patients with DCIS have an increased risk of both subsequent breast malignancy and breast cancer death compared with women in the general population. Our results support previous knowledge of DCIS as a heterogeneous disease.
KeywordsBreast cancer Ductal carcinoma in situ Mammography screening Mortality Second malignancy Treatment
The study was funded by South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (Grant No. 3b-110), which has not had any further influence on the study.
Conflict of interest statement
- 12.Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Correa C, McGale P, Taylor C, Wang Y, Clarke M, Davies C, Peto R, Bijker N, Solin L, Darby S (2010) Overview of the randomized trials of radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010:162–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Allegra CJ, Aberle DR, Ganschow P, Hahn SM, Lee CN, Millon-Underwood S, Pike MC, Reed SD, Saftlas AF, Scarvalone SA, Schwartz AM, Slomski C, Yothers G, Zon R (2009) NIH state-of-the-science conference statement: diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). NIH Consens State Sci Statements 26:1–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Bijker N, Meijnen P, Peterse JL, Bogaerts J, Van Hoorebeeck I, Julien JP, Gennaro M, Rouanet P, Avril A, Fentiman IS, Bartelink H, Rutgers EJ (2006) Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma-in situ: ten-year results of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized phase III trial 10853—a study by the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. J Clin Oncol 24:3381–3387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Pintilie M (2006) Competing risks: a practical perspective. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- 28.Wapnir IL, Dignam JJ, Fisher B, Mamounas EP, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Land SR, Margolese RG, Swain SM, Costantino JP, Wolmark N (2011) Long-term outcomes of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences after lumpectomy in NSABP B-17 and B-24 randomized clinical trials for DCIS. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:478–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Provenzano E, Pinder SE (2009) Pre-operative diagnosis of breast cancer in screening: problems and pitfalls. Pathology (Phila) 41:3–17Google Scholar