Deoxycytidine kinase is overexpressed in poor outcome breast cancer and determines responsiveness to nucleoside analogs
- 258 Downloads
Only a minority of breast cancer patients responds to chemotherapy and we lack predictive biomarkers that help to select a patient-tailored therapy that takes into consideration the molecular heterogeneity of the cancer type. Responsiveness to the clinically important nucleoside analogs gemcitabine and decitabine may be critically determined by Deoxycytidine kinase (DCK) expression as this enzyme is required to convert the inactive prodrugs into their pharmacologically active forms. Here, we examined whether DCK is differentially expressed in breast cancer and evaluated whether DCK expression levels control responsiveness to these nucleoside analogs in vitro by experimentally modulating DCK expression levels. We examined DCK expression in gene expression data sets of breast tumors including the series of 295 consecutive patients that have been classified into low or high risk for recurrence using the MammaPrint 70 gene profile. We found that DCK is expressed at higher levels in patients having poor clinical outcome as judged by the MammaPrint assay. As such, patients that have a poor prognosis may thus be susceptible to treatment with nucleoside analogs. In support of this, we found a causal relationship between DCK levels and sensitivity to these nucleoside analogs in breast cancer cell lines. The data indicate that breast cancers that are at high risk of recurrence express higher levels of DCK, which we find to be strongly correlated to a favorable response to nucleoside analogs. The data suggest that DCK expression in breast cancer could be exploited to select patients that are likely to respond to treatment with nucleoside analogs.
KeywordsDCK Gemcitabine Nucleoside analogs Breast cancer Biomarker
We thank Lucas Bruurs for technical assistance. The work of the authors was supported by the SPINOZA grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).
Conflict of Interest
RB and ST are employees of Agendia BV, the company that markets the MammaPrint prognosis test for breast cancer.
- 1.WHO (2009) Fact sheet 297Google Scholar
- 3.Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans E, Godwin J, Gray R, Hicks C, James S, MacKinnon E, McGale P, McHugh T, Peto R, Taylor C, Wang Y (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366(9503):2087–2106. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-7 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Tan DS, Gerlinger M, Teh BT, Swanton C (2010) Anti-cancer drug resistance: Understanding the mechanisms through the use of integrative genomics and functional RNA interference. Eur J Cancer. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.03.019
- 8.Berns K, Horlings HM, Hennessy BT, Madiredjo M, Hijmans EM, Beelen K, Linn SC, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Stemke-Hale K, Hauptmann M, Beijersbergen RL, Mills GB, van de Vijver MJ, Bernards R (2007) A functional genetic approach identifies the PI3K pathway as a major determinant of trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 12(4):395–402. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.08.030 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord CJ, Tutt AN, Johnson DA, Richardson TB, Santarosa M, Dillon KJ, Hickson I, Knights C, Martin NM, Jackson SP, Smith GC, Ashworth A (2005) Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature 434(7035):917–921. doi: 10.1038/nature03445 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.van t’Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Hart AA, Mao M, Peterse HL, van der Kooy K, Marton MJ, Witteveen AT, Schreiber GJ, Kerkhoven RM, Roberts C, Linsley PS, Bernards R, Friend SH (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415(6871):530–536. doi: 10.1038/415530a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van t’Veer LJ, Dai H, Hart AA, Voskuil DW, Schreiber GJ, Peterse JL, Roberts C, Marton MJ, Parrish M, Atsma D, Witteveen A, Glas A, Delahaye L, van der Velde T, Bartelink H, Rodenhuis S, Rutgers ET, Friend SH, Bernards R (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(25):1999–2009. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021967 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Blackstock AW, Lightfoot H, Case LD, Tepper JE, Mukherji SK, Mitchell BS, Swarts SG, Hess SM (2001) Tumor uptake and elimination of 2′,2′-difluoro-2′-deoxycytidine (gemcitabine) after deoxycytidine kinase gene transfer: correlation with in vivo tumor response. Clin Cancer Res 7(10):3263–3268PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Beausejour CM, Gagnon J, Primeau M, Momparler RL (2002) Cytotoxic activity of 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine, 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine and cytosine arabinoside in cells transduced with deoxycytidine kinase gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293(5):1478–1484. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00413-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Stegmann AP, Honders MW, Hagemeijer A, Hoebee B, Willemze R, Landegent JE (1995) In vitro-induced resistance to the deoxycytidine analogues cytarabine (AraC) and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (DAC) in a rat model for acute myeloid leukemia is mediated by mutations in the deoxycytidine kinase (DCK) gene. Ann Hematol 71(1):41–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Glas AM, Floore A, Delahaye LJ, Witteveen AT, Pover RC, Bakx N, Lahti-Domenici JS, Bruinsma TJ, Warmoes MO, Bernards R, Wessels LF, Van’t Veer LJ (2006) Converting a breast cancer microarray signature into a high-throughput diagnostic test. BMC Genomics 7:278. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-278 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Szatmari T, Huszty G, Desaknai S, Spasokoukotskaja T, Sasvari-Szekely M, Staub M, Esik O, Safrany G, Lumniczky K (2008) Adenoviral vector transduction of the human deoxycytidine kinase gene enhances the cytotoxic and radiosensitizing effect of gemcitabine on experimental gliomas. Cancer Gene Ther 15(3):154–164. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7701115 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Sebastiani V, Ricci F, Rubio-Viqueira B, Kulesza P, Yeo CJ, Hidalgo M, Klein A, Laheru D, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA (2006) Immunohistochemical and genetic evaluation of deoxycytidine kinase in pancreatic cancer: relationship to molecular mechanisms of gemcitabine resistance and survival. Clin Cancer Res 12(8):2492–2497. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2655 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Marechal R, Mackey JR, Lai R, Demetter P, Peeters M, Polus M, Cass CE, Salmon I, Deviere J, Van Laethem JL Deoxycitidine kinase is associated with prolonged survival after adjuvant gemcitabine for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25303
- 33.Fujita H, Ohuchida K, Mizumoto K, Itaba S, Ito T, Nakata K, Yu J, Kayashima T, Souzaki R, Tajiri T, Manabe T, Ohtsuka T, Tanaka M (2010) Gene expression levels as predictive markers of outcome in pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Neoplasia 12(10):807–817PubMedGoogle Scholar