Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 123, Supplement 1, pp 11–13

Imaging diagnosis of young women with breast cancer

Brief Report


  1. 1.
    Foxcroft LM, Evans EB, Porter AJ (2004) The diagnosis of breast cancer in women younger than 40. Breast 13(4):297–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nixon AJ, Neuberg D, Hayes DF, Gelman R, Connolly JL, Schnitt S et al (1994) Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis for patients with stage I or II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 12(5):888–894PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barber MD, Jack W, Dixon JM (2004) Diagnostic delay in breast cancer. Br J Surg 91(1):49–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ruddy KJ, Gelber S, Tamimi R, Schapira L, Come S, Kereakoglow S et al (2009) Presentation of breast cancer in young women. J Clin Oncol (Meet Abstr) 27(15S):6608Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di Nubila B, Cassano E, Urban LA, Fedele P, Abbate F, Maisonneuve P et al (2006) Radiological features and pathological–biological correlations in 348 women with breast cancer under 35 years old. Breast 15(6):744–753CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harris VJ, Jackson VP (1989) Indications for breast imaging in women under age 35 years. Radiology 172(2):445–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353(17):1773–1783CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lynes J, Riha C (2004) Learning the fundamentals of … DICOM. Biomed Instrum Technol 38(1):35–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ (2005) Digital mammography. Radiology 234(2):353–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Houssami N, Irwig L, Simpson JM, McKessar M, Blome S, Noakes J (2003) Sydney breast imaging accuracy study: comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(4):935–940PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225(1):165–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morrow M, Wong S, Venta L (1998) The evaluation of breast masses in women younger than forty years of age. Surgery 124(4):634–640 discussion 640-1CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swinson C, Ravichandran D, Nayagam M, Allen S (2009) Ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology of the axilla in the pre-operative identification of axillary nodal involvement in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(11):1152–1157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Ollivier L, Thibault F, El Khoury C, Neuenschwander S (2009) How to optimize breast ultrasound. Eur J Radiol 69(1):6–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, Burke W, Costanza ME, Evans WP 3rd et al (2003) American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 53(3):141–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD et al (2007) American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57(2):75–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Obdeijn IM, Boetes C, Zonderland HM, Muller SH et al (2006) Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography and MRI in women with an inherited risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 100(1):109–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Hanna L et al (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356(13):1295–1303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Leutner CC, Koenig R et al (2007) MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370(9586):485–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Whipp E, Beresford M, Sawyer E, Halliwell M (2010) True local recurrence rate in the conserved breast after magnetic resonance imaging-targeted radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76(4):984–990PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Breast Radiology Department, UDIAT Centre DiagnòsticCorporació Sanitària Parc TaulíSabadell, BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations