Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 123, Issue 3, pp 895–900 | Cite as

Nipple discharge: is its significance as a risk factor for breast cancer fully understood? Observational study including 915 consecutive patients who underwent selective duct excision

  • Isacco Montroni
  • Donatella Santini
  • Giorgia Zucchini
  • Monica Fiacchi
  • Simone Zanotti
  • Giampaolo Ugolini
  • Alessio Manaresi
  • Mario Taffurelli
Brief Report


Nipple discharge (ND) is a common symptom seen in breast cancer clinics. The primary aim of this study was to identify preoperative risk factors for breast cancer in patients with pathologic ND. The secondary aim was to assess the clinical and pathological effectiveness of physical examination, galactography, cytological examination of the discharge, selective duct excision and ductoscopy. All patients operated on between 1975 and 2008 who presented with ND as their only symptom was analyzed. Discharge’s characteristics, cytological data and galactography reports were recorded. The relationship between each individual finding and the risk of breast cancer was calculated. For each diagnostic tool, the sensitivity, specificity and complication rates were calculated and compared. Nine-hundred-fifteen patients underwent selective duct excision. Two-hundred-nineteen patients (23.9%) were found to be affected by carcinoma. In 100/330 (30.3%) patients with bloody discharge and in 42/239 (17.6%) patients with serous secretion cancer was detected (P = 0.004, P = 0.013, respectively). Patients with sero-sanguinous or coloured discharge had the same risk of cancer as the population analyzed (23.9%, P = NS). Galactographic finding of irregular stenosis seemed to be associated with a higher risk of cancer (P = 0.0001). Cytological findings C5 and C4 were associated with cancer (P = 0.001). Selective duct excision showed highest sensitivity and specificity. In conclusion, the well established role of bloody secretion is confirmed. The supposed benign aetiology of serous, coloured or sero-sanguinous discharge is questionable. The high specificity of the cytological exam justifies routine examination of the ND. Selective duct excision can be considered as the diagnostic gold-standard.


Nipple discharge Breast cancer Selective duct excision Risk factors Surgery 


  1. 1.
    Gulay H, Bora S, Kilicturgay S et al (1994) Management of nipple discharge. J Am Coll Surg 178:471–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murphy IG, Dillon MF, O’Doherty A et al (2007) Analysis of patients with false negative mammography and symptomatic breast carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 96:457–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vargas HI, Vargas MP, Eldrageely K et al (2006) Outcomes of clinical and surgical assessment of women with pathological nipple discharge. Am Surg 72:124–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hussain AN, Policarpio C, Vincent MT (2006) Evaluating nipple discharge. Obstet Gynecol Surv 61:278–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sauter ER, Schlatter L, Lininger J et al (2004) The association of bloody nipple discharge with breast pathology. Surgery 136:780–785CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simmons R, Adamovich T, Brennan M et al (2003) Nonsurgical evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 10:113–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al (2002) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 55(2):74–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    King TA, Carter KM, Bolton JS et al (2000) A simple approach to nipple discharge. Am Surg 66:960–966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murad TM, Contesso G, Mouriesse H (1982) Nipple discharge from the breast. Ann Surg 195:259–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kapenhas-Valdes E, Feldman SM, Boolbol SK (2008) The role of mammary ductoscopy in breast cancer: a review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol 15:3350–3360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dixon JM, Mansel RE (1994) ABC of breast diseases: symptoms assessment and guidelines for referral. BMJ 309:722–726PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adepoju LJ, Chun J, El-Tamer M et al (2005) The value of clinical characteristics and breast-imaging studies in predicting a histopathologic diagnosis of cancer or high risk lesion in patients with spontaneous nipple discharge. Am J Surg 190:644–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dinkel HP, Gassel AM, Muller T et al (2001) Galactography and exfoliative cytology in women with abnormal nipple discharge. Obstet Gynecol 97:625–629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Florio MG, Manganaro T, Pollicino A et al (1999) Surgical approach to nipple discharge: a ten-year experience. J Surg Oncol 71:235–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Locker AP, Galea MH, Ellis IO et al (1988) Microdochectomy for single duct discharge from the nipple. Br J Surg 75:700–701CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Masanori H, Hiroshi N, Takehiko G (2007) MR ductography: comparison with conventional ductography as a diagnostic method in patients with nipple discharge. RadioGraphics 27:183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    National Task Force for Breast Cancer Autori (2007) FONCAM guidelines for breast pathology. Florence, Italy. Mancano le pagineGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Louie LD, Crowe JP, Dawson AE et al (2006) Identification of breast cancer in patients with pathologic nipple discharge: does ductoscopy predict malignancy? Am J Surg 192(4):530–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hunerbein M, Dubowy A, Raubach M et al (2007) Gradient index ductoscopy and intraductal biopsy of intraductal breast lesions. Am J Surg 194:511–514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klimberg VS (2003) Nipple discharge: more than pathologic. Ann Surg Oncol 10(2):98–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lang JE, Kuerer HM (2007) Breast ductal secretions: clinical features, potential uses, and possible applications. Cancer Control 14(4):350–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pritt B, Pang Y, Kellogg M et al (2004) Diagnostic value of nipple cytology: study of 466 cases. Cancer 102(4):233–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kooistra BW, Wauters C, van de Ven S et al (2009) The diagnostic value of nipple discharge cytology in 618 consecutive patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(6):573–577PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isacco Montroni
    • 1
  • Donatella Santini
    • 2
  • Giorgia Zucchini
    • 2
  • Monica Fiacchi
    • 1
  • Simone Zanotti
    • 1
  • Giampaolo Ugolini
    • 1
  • Alessio Manaresi
    • 1
  • Mario Taffurelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General Surgery, Emergency Surgery and Organ TransplantationUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Hematology, Oncology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations