Concordant HER2 status between metastatic breast cancer cells in CSF and primary breast cancer tissue
- 177 Downloads
It is not known whether the HER2 status of malignant CSF cells coincides with that of the original breast carcinoma cells. We investigated whether CSF cytology specimens were suitable to evaluate HER2 status by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in patient with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM). Both formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast cancer tissue and liquid based CSF cytology specimens were evaluated for HER2 status in 16 patients with LM. We evaluated HER2 gene amplification using FISH on destained CSF cytology slides containing a minimum of 20 malignant cells per slide, and compared these with the HER2 status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or FISH in FFPE tissues. HER2 was considered positive when the HER2:CEP17 ratio was ≥2.0 or IHC 3+. Of 16 cases, four were HER2 positive and 12 were HER2 negative by FISH analysis in CSF cytology. All CSF-positive cases were HER2 positive by IHC in FFPE tissue. Of 12 HER2 FISH-negative cases in CSF cytology, 10 were HER2 negative (IHC 0 or 1+) and two were IHC 2+ in FFPE tissue. Two IHC 2+ cases had HER2:CEP17 ratios of 1.27 and 2.1, respectively, by FISH in FFPE tissue. As a result, the HER2 status concordance rate between metastatic breast cancer cells in CSF and FFPE primary tissue by IHC and FISH was very high. When CSF cytology specimens were appropriately prepared and had adequate cellularity without dry artifacts, the CSF cytology was suitable to evaluate HER2 status by FISH analysis in patients with LM.
KeywordsBreast cancer Leptomeningeal metastasis CSF cytology HER2 FISH
This study was supported in part by NCC Grant 0610240.
- 2.Kim DY, Lee KW, Yun T, Park SR, Jung JY, Kim DW et al (2003) Comparison of intrathecal chemotherapy for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis of a solid tumor: methotrexate alone versus methotrexate in combination with cytosine arabinoside and hydrocortisone. Jpn J Clin Oncol 33:608–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Grossman SA, Finkelstein DM, Ruckdeschel JC, Trump DL, Moynihan T, Ettinger DS (1993) Randomized prospective comparison of intraventricular methotrexate and thiotepa in patients with previously untreated neoplastic meningitis. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 11:561–569PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Colozza M, Minenza E, Gori S, Fenocchio D, Paolucci C, Aristei C et al (2009) Extended survival of a HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer patient with brain metastases also treated with intrathecal trastuzumab. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 63:1157–1159. doi: 10.1007/s00280-008-0859-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Stemmler HJ, Mengele K, Schmitt M, Harbeck N, Laessig D, Herrmann KA et al (2008) Intrathecal trastuzumab (Herceptin) and methotrexate for meningeal carcinomatosis in HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer: a case report. Anticancer Drugs 19:832–836. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e32830b58b0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Stemmler HJ, Schmitt M, Willems A, Bernhard H, Harbeck N, Heinemann V (2007) Ratio of trastuzumab levels in serum and cerebrospinal fluid is altered in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases and impairment of blood-brain barrier. Anticancer Drugs 18:23–28. doi: 10.1097/01.cad.0000236313.50833.ee CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Liedtke C, Broglio K, Moulder S, Hsu L, Kau SW, Symmans WF et al (2009) Prognostic impact of discordance between triple-receptor measurements in primary and recurrent breast cancer. Ann Oncol. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp263. (Epub ahead of print)