Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 112, Issue 3, pp 545–549 | Cite as

Oncological results of immediate breast reconstruction: long term follow-up of a large series at a single institution

  • J. Y. Petit
  • O. Gentilini
  • N. Rotmensz
  • P. Rey
  • M. Rietjens
  • C. Garusi
  • E. Botteri
  • F. De Lorenzi
  • S. Martella
  • R. Bosco
  • D. K. Khuthaila
  • A. Luini
Clinical Trial

Abstract

Background Reconstruction of the breast after mastectomy is an integral part of the complete management of breast cancer. However, a delay in the reconstruction is usually proposed after the mastectomy in case of invasive cancer, while there is a general agreement for immediate breast reconstruction in case of in situ tumors. Patients and methods Among a total of 677 patients having undergone a mastectomy between 1997 and 2001, 518 (76.5%) underwent an immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). All the patients had a Patey mastectomy for invasive cancer (T1–T3). An adjuvant medical treatment was given according to the biological characteristics of the tumor and lymph node status. No patient received any kind of radiotherapy. The median follow up was 70 months (range 13–114). Results The local recurrence rate was 5.2% for the group of IBR and 9.4% for the mastectomy group without IBR (NoIBR). The regional metastases rate was 1.4 vs. 1.3%. The rate of distant metastases was 13.9 vs. 16.4%. Contra-lateral breast tumor was observed in 1.5 vs. 1.3%. Death rate was 10.4 vs. 16.4%. No statistical difference was observed between the two groups in terme of overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) (HRIBR vs. NoIBR: 1.03 and 0.99 for OS and DFS, respectively). Conclusion At our institution we have compared a large series that have undergone IBR (518) with a control group (159) and followed over a prolonged period of time (70 months). This study provides the best available results to suggest that IBR is a safe and reliable treatment option for the managing invasive breast cancer.

Keywords

Immediate breast recontruction Invasive breast cancer Local recurrence Mastectomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Kronowitz SJ, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM, Babiera G, McNeese MD, Buchholz TA, Strom EA, Robb GL (2004) Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(6):1617–1628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tran NV, Chang DW, Gupta A, Kroll SS, Robb GL (2001) Comparison of immediate and delayed free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(1):78–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rey P, Martinelli G, Petit JY, Youssef O, De Lorenzi F, Rietjens M, Garusi C, Giraldo A (2005) Immediate breast reconstruction and high-dose chemotherapy. Ann Plast Surg 55(3):250–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salhab M, Al Sarakbi W, Joseph A, Sheards S, Travers J, Mokbel K (2006) Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: patient satisfaction and clinical outcome. Int J Clin Oncol 11(1):51–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Downes KJ, Glatt BS, Kanchwala SK, Mick R, Fraker DL, Fox KR, Solin LJ, Bucky LP, Czerniecki BJ (2005) Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction is an acceptable treatment option for patients with high-risk breast carcinoma. Cancer 103(5):906–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Knottenbelt A, Spauwen PH, Wobbes T (2004) The oncological implications of immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 30(8):829–833PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murphy RX Jr, Wahhab S, Rovito PF, Harper G, Kimmel SR, Kleinman LC, Young MJ (2003) Impact of immediate reconstruction on the local recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg 50(4):333–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Noone RB, Frazier TG, Noone GC, Blanchet NP, Murphy JB, Rose D (1994) Recurrence of breast carcinoma following immediate reconstruction: a 13-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 93(1):96–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB, Houlihan MJ, Koufman CN, Morris DJ, Troyan SL, Goldwyn RM (1998) Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: oncologic risks and aesthetic results in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(1):49–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kroll SS, Khoo A, Singletary SE, Ames FC, Wang BG, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Robb GL (1999) Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(2):421–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sandelin K, Wickman M, Billgren AM (2004) Oncological outcome after immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer: a long-term study. Breast 13(3):210–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taylor CW, Horgan K, Dodwell D (2005) Oncological aspects of breast reconstruction. Breast 14(2):118–130. ReviewGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jager JJ, Volovics L, Schouten LJ, de Jong JM, Hupperets PS, von Meyenfeldt MF, Schutte B, Blijham GH (1999) Loco-regional recurrences after mastectomy in breast cancer: prognostic factors and implications for postoperative irradiation. Radiother Oncol 50(3):267–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cahan AC, Ashikari R, Pressman P, Cody H, Hoffman S, Sherman JE (1995) Breast cancer after breast augmentation with silicone implants. Ann Surg Oncol 2(2):121–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Y. Petit
    • 1
  • O. Gentilini
    • 2
  • N. Rotmensz
    • 3
  • P. Rey
    • 1
  • M. Rietjens
    • 1
  • C. Garusi
    • 1
  • E. Botteri
    • 3
  • F. De Lorenzi
    • 1
  • S. Martella
    • 1
  • R. Bosco
    • 1
  • D. K. Khuthaila
    • 1
  • A. Luini
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryEuropean Institute of OncologyMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Breast SurgeryEuropean Institute of OncologyMilanItaly
  3. 3.Department of BiostatisticsEuropean Institute of OncologyMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations