Advertisement

Are mammography recommendations in women younger than 40 related to increased risk?

  • Julie M. KappEmail author
  • Bonnie C. Yankaskas
  • Michael L. LeFevre
Report

Abstract

Our objective was to examine the association between self-reported breast cancer risk factors and reported physician recommendations for mammography among women younger than 40. This study uses the 2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and includes 2,703 women ages 30–39 who reported having seen a doctor in the past 12 months. The NHIS is a population-based, cross-sectional survey of adult respondents in the United States. Overall, 19.0% of these women reported a recent mammography recommendation. Among women reporting no prior mammogram, women ages 30–34 with risk factors for breast cancer were more likely to report a recent mammogram recommendation than women without risk factors. There was no such association for women ages 35–39. Among women who reported a prior mammogram, risk factors were not associated with a recommendation for mammography; there was an association with age and recent clinical breast examination. Despite a lack of evidence-based guidelines for women under 40 years of age, these data suggest some younger women are being recommended for early mammography without indication. The relative benefits and harms of recommending mammography in this age group need further examination.

Keywords

Mammography Mass screening Practice guidelines Breast neoplasms Risk factors 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The findings, interpretations, and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of any affiliated organizations. The authors thank Joseph W. LeMaster, MD, MPH and David R. Mehr, MD, MS for their review of an earlier draft. The authors would like to acknowledge the expert editing of this manuscript by Mr. Dale Smith, University of Missouri-Columbia. Departmental funds supported his role in this project. No external funding supported this study and the authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Lemon SC, Zapka JG, Clemow L et al (2006) Mammography screening after breast cancer diagnosis in a first degree female relative: age group differences (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17:1053–1065. doi: 10.1007/s10552-006-0039-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kapp JM, Ryerson AB, Coughlin SS et al (2008) Racial and ethnic differences in mammography use among U.S. women younger than age 40. Breast Cancer Res Treat. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9919-2 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colbert JA, Kaine EM, Bigby J et al (2004) The age at which women begin mammographic screening. Cancer 101:1850–1859. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20583 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dodd GD (1992) American cancer society guidelines on screening for breast cancer. An overview. Cancer 69:1885–1887. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19920401)69:7+<1885::AID-CNCR2820691702>3.0.CO;2-BCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2008) Medicare and You 2008. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.medicare.gov/Publications/Pubs/pdf/10050.pdf. Cited 7 July 2008
  6. 6.
    American Cancer Society (2007) Cancer facts & figures, 2007. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    American Cancer Society (2008) Cancer facts & figures, 2008. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burke W, Daly M, Garber J et al (1997) Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. JAMA 277:997–1003. doi: 10.1001/jama.277.12.997 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robson M, Offit K (2007) Clinical practice. Management of an inherited predisposition to breast cancer. N Engl J Med 357:154–162. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp071286 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 137:344–346Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meissner HI, Breen N, Taubman ML et al (2007) Which women aren’t getting mammograms and why? (United States). Cancer Causes Control 18:61–70. doi: 10.1007/s10552-006-0078-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    National Center for Health Statistics (2006) Data file documentation, National Health Interview Survey, 2005 (machine readable data file and documentation). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MDGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    National Center for Health Statistics (2007) 2005 Imputed Family Income/Personal Earnings Files. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhis/2005imputedincome.htm. Cited 15 May 2007
  14. 14.
    Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vetto JT, Wheeler AJ, Toomey M et al (2006) Outcomes among women younger than age 40 in a state breast cancer screening program. Am J Surg 191:635–640. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.035 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tosteson AN, Stout NK, Fryback DG et al (2008) Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 148:1–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yankaskas BC (2005) Epidemiology of breast cancer in young women. Breast Dis 23:3–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Armstrong K, Moye E, Williams S et al (2007) Screening mammography in women 40–49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 146:516–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM et al (1998) Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 338:1089–1096. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804163381601 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al (2008) Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58:71–96. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie M. Kapp
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bonnie C. Yankaskas
    • 2
  • Michael L. LeFevre
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Family and Community MedicineUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations