Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European institute of oncology of Milan (EIO)

  • J. Y. Petit
  • U. Veronesi
  • R. Orecchia
  • P. Rey
  • S. Martella
  • F. Didier
  • G. Viale
  • P. Veronesi
  • A. Luini
  • V. Galimberti
  • R. Bedolis
  • M. Rietjens
  • C. Garusi
  • F. De Lorenzi
  • R. Bosco
  • A. Manconi
  • G. B. Ivaldi
  • O. Youssef
Clinical Trial

Abstract

In order to reduce mutilation, nipple-areola complex (NAC) conservation can be proposed for the treatment of breast cancer when mastectomy is indicated. To reduce the risk of retro areolar recurrence, a novel radiosurgical treatment combining subcutaneous mastectomy with intraoperative radiotherapy (ELIOT) is proposed. One thousand and one nipple sparing mastectomies (NSM) were performed from March 2002 to November 2007 at the European institute of oncology (EIO), for invasive carcinoma in 82% of the patients and in situ carcinoma in 18%. Clinical complications, aesthetic results, oncological and psychological results were recorded. A comparison was performed between the 800 patients who received ELIOT and the 201 who underwent delayed one-shot radiotherapy on the days following the operation. The median follow up time was 20 months (range 1–69) for a follow up performed in 83% of the patients. The NAC necrosed totally in 35 cases (3.5%) and partially in 55 (5.5%) and was removed in 50 (5%). Twenty infections (2%) were observed and 43 (4.3%) prostheses removed. The median rate of the patients for global cosmetic result on a scale ranging from 0 (worst) to 10 (excellent) was 8. Evaluation by the surgeon in charge of the follow-up gave a similar result. Only 15% of the patients reported a partial sensitivity of the NAC. Of the fourteen (1.4%) local recurrences, ten occurred close to the tumour site, all far from the NAC corresponding to the field of radiation. No recurrences were observed in the NAC. In a group of patients characterized by a very close free margin under the areola, no local recurrence was observed. Overall, 36 cases of metastases and 4 deaths were observed. No significant outcome difference was observed between the 800 patients receiving intraoperative radiotherapy (ELIOT) and the 201 patients receiving delayed irradiation.

Keywords

Mastectomy Nipple sparing Breast cancer Intraoperative radiotherapy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge William Russell Edu for his English revision of the text. This study has been supported by AVON Italy

References

  1. 1.
    Veronesi U, Volterrani F, Luini A et al (1990) Quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy for small size breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 26(6):671–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carlson GW, Losken A, Moore B et al (2001) Results of immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg 46(3):222–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carlson GW, Bostwick JRD, Styblo TM et al (1997) Skin-sparing mastectomy oncologic and reconstructive considerations. Ann Surg 225(5):570–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peyser PM, Abel JA, Straker VF et al (2000) Ultra conservative skin-sparing “keyhole” mastectomy and immediate breast and areola reconstruction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82(4):227–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ho CM, Mak CK, Lau Y et al (2003) Skin involvement in invasive breast carcinoma: safety of skin sparing-mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 10(2):102–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carlson GW, Styblo TM, Lyles RH et al (2003) Local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy: tumor biology or surgical conservatism? Ann Surg Oncol 10(2):108–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simmons RM, Fish SK, Gayle L et al (1999) Local and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomy compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 6(7):676–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB et al (1998) Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: oncologic risks and aesthetic results in patients with early stage breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(1):49–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kroll SS, Khoo A, Singletary SE et al (1999) Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(2):421–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Medina-Franco H, Vasconez LO, Fix RJ et al (2002) Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg 235(6):814–819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beer GM, Varga Z, Budi S et al (2002) Incidence of the superficial fascia and its relevance in skin-sparing mastectomy. Cancer 94(6):1619–1625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little JWIII (1987) The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 80(5):699–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cense HA, Rutgers EJ, Lopes-Cardozo M, Van Lanschot JJ (2001) Nipple sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? Eur J Surg Oncol 6:521–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lambert PA, Kolm P, Perry RR (2000) Parameters that predict nipple involvement in breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 191(4):354–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ (2000) Subareolar breast cancers. Am J Surg 180(3):167–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vyas JJ, Chinoy RF, Vaidya JS (1998) Prediction of nipple and areola involvement in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 24(1):15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb GL, Singletary SE (1999) The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 6:609–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T et al (2003) Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg 238(1):120–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Merrick HW, Battle JA, Padgett BJ, Dobelbower RR (1997) ELIOT for early breast cancer: a report on long-term results. Front Radiat Ther Oncol 31:126–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R et al (2003) The nipple-sparing mastectomy: early results of a feasibility study of a new application of perioperative radiotherapy (ELIOT) in the treatment of breast cancer when mastectomy is indicated. Tumori 89:288–291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    DuBois J-B, Hay M, Gely S, Saint-Aubert B, Rouanet P, Pujol H (1997) ELIOT in breast carcinomas. Front Radiat Ther Oncol 31:131–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Battle JA, DuBois J-B, Merrick HW, Dobelbower RR (1999) ELIOT for breast cancer. In: Gunderson LL et al (eds) Current clinical oncology: intraoperative irradiation: techniques and results. Humana Press. Inc, New York, pp 521–526Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Luini A, Gatti G, Intra M, Veronesi P et al (2001) Focalised intraoperative irradiation after conservative surgery for early stage breast cancer. The breast 10(Suppl 3):84–89Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Luini A et al (2001) A preliminary report of intraoperative radiotherapy (ELIOT) in limited-stage breast cancers that are conservatively treated. Eur J Cancer 37:2178–2183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L, Geigant E, Solders G (1997) Touch sensibility in the breast after subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with a prosthesis. Br J Plast Surg 50(6):443–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P et al (2002) Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 9(2):165–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chagpar AB (2004) Skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy: preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative considerations. Am Surg 70(5):425–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Crowe JP Jr, Kim JA, Yetman R, Bambury J, Patrick RJ, Baynes D (2004) Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg 139(2):148–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Simmons RM, Hollenbeck ST, Latrenta GS (2003) Areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 51(6):547–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Y. Petit
    • 1
  • U. Veronesi
    • 2
  • R. Orecchia
    • 3
  • P. Rey
    • 1
  • S. Martella
    • 1
  • F. Didier
    • 4
  • G. Viale
    • 7
  • P. Veronesi
    • 5
  • A. Luini
    • 6
  • V. Galimberti
    • 6
  • R. Bedolis
    • 4
  • M. Rietjens
    • 1
  • C. Garusi
    • 1
  • F. De Lorenzi
    • 1
  • R. Bosco
    • 1
  • A. Manconi
    • 1
  • G. B. Ivaldi
    • 3
  • O. Youssef
    • 8
  1. 1.Plastic Surgery DepartmentEuropean Institute of OncologyMilanItaly
  2. 2.Scientific Direction (EIO)MilanItaly
  3. 3.Department of Radiotherapy (EIO)University of Milan, School of MedicineMilanItaly
  4. 4.Psycho Oncology Unit (EIO)MilanItaly
  5. 5.Department of Senology (EIO)University of Milan, School of Medicine European Institute of OncologyMilanItaly
  6. 6.Department of Senology (EIO)MilanItaly
  7. 7.Department of Anatomo Pathology (EIO)MilanItaly
  8. 8.Department of Surgery, Cancer Center of CairoCairo UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations